CyberCriminal.com

Alexandra Jakob

We are investigating Alexandra Jakob for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Alexandra Jakob

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 06 January 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 3006/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 08 March 2025

Alexandra Jakob
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Alexandra Jakob in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Alexandra Jakob over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Alexandra Jakob - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Alexandra Jakob, a Sydney-based entrepreneur celebrated for her ventures in childcare and haircare. However, as I delved deeper, a series of red flags emerged, painting a more complex picture of this seemingly illustrious figure.

The Assault Allegation: A Glimpse Behind Closed Doors

In January 2024, news broke that Alexandra Jakob had been charged with common assault and destruction of property following an alleged incident with her partner, Michael Burn, at her Point Piper residence. Court documents revealed that Jakob was accused of assaulting Burn and damaging a door during the altercation. She pleaded not guilty, with the case scheduled for a hearing in August 2024. While the presumption of innocence is a cornerstone of our legal system, such allegations inevitably cast a shadow over one’s public image.

The Company She Keeps: Associations Under Scrutiny

The plot thickens when considering Jakob’s relationship with Michael Burn. Prior to their involvement, Burn was known in certain circles by his stage name, ‘Mr. Jake Ryan,’ one of Australia’s top male escorts, charging up to $5,000 a night. While everyone has a past, the juxtaposition of Jakob’s entrepreneurial image with Burn’s former profession adds a layer of intrigue to their narrative.

Legal Entanglements: A Web of Accusations

The drama doesn’t end there. In February 2025, Burn sought an apprehended violence order against his former partner, Geoffrey Williams, alleging harassment. Williams, in turn, accused Jakob of threatening to “have a bullet put in his head” after learning of his past relationship with Burn. Such serious allegations, regardless of their veracity, contribute to a growing list of controversies surrounding Jakob.

The Streisand Effect: Attempts at Censorship Backfiring

In today’s digital age, attempts to suppress information often lead to unintended consequences. This phenomenon, known as the “Streisand Effect,” occurs when efforts to hide or censor information result in greater public interest and dissemination of that information. If Jakob or her associates have attempted to silence these controversies, it may have only amplified public curiosity and scrutiny.

Implications for Investors: A Cautionary Tale

For potential investors, these red flags serve as cautionary signals. While business acumen is paramount, the personal conduct and associations of business leaders can significantly impact a company’s reputation and, by extension, its profitability. The controversies surrounding Jakob raise questions about her judgment and the potential risks of associating with her ventures.

Conclusion: The Facade Cracks

While Alexandra Jakob’s entrepreneurial achievements are noteworthy, the emerging controversies suggest a more complicated reality. Investors and authorities alike should approach with caution, ensuring that due diligence is conducted to navigate the murky waters that lie beneath the surface of her public persona.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47809468
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48107040
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47812945
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47810977
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47925123
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47927954
  • 06 January  2025
  • Lee Media Group
  • Jeven Boca
  • Ashsih Majnu
  • Barren Lemski
  • Kimberly Media Corp.
  • [REDACTED]
  • https://reptitle.com/alexandra-jakob-charged-with-assaulting-her-new-boyfriend-in-sydney/
  • https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14144503/Alexandra-Jacob-Michael-Burn-engagement.html
  • https://reptitle.com/how-bondiboost-founder-alexandra-jakob-fell-head-over-heels-for-former-male-escort-michael-burn-who-charged-500-an-hour-before-she-was-charged-with-assaulting-him-at-her-mansion/
  • https://reptitle.com/how-bondiboost-founder-alexandra-jakob-fell-head-over-heels-for-former-male-escort-michael-burn-who-charged-500-an-hour-before-she-was-charged-with-assaulting-him-at-her-mansion-2/
  • https://whatsnew2day.com/alexandra-jakob-charged-with-assaulting-her-new-boyfriend-in-sydney
  • https://nybreaking.com/how-bondiboost-founder-alexandra-jakob-fell-head-heels-former-male-escort-michael-burn-charged-500-hour-charged-assaulting-mansion-htmlns_mchannelrssns_campaign1490ito1490/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

whatsnew2day.com

Alexandra Jakob charged with assaulting her new boyfriend in Sydney

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

reptitle.com

How BondiBoost founder Alexandra Jakob fell head over heels for former male escort Michael Burn who charged $500-an-hour – before she was charged with assaulting him at her mansion

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login