What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Bruce Calvin Deck over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Bruce Calvin Deck - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
As an investigative journalist, I embarked on a deep dive into the murky waters surrounding Bruce Calvin Deck—a name that, for many, might not ring a bell, but perhaps should. My mission was straightforward: to unearth any red flags and adverse media associated with Deck and his related entities, and to understand the lengths he might be going to keep such information under wraps. What I discovered was a tapestry of regulatory run-ins, questionable practices, and attempts to sidestep scrutiny that should give any potential investor serious pause.
A History Marred by Regulatory Sanctions
Our story begins in Prince George, British Columbia, where Deck once operated under the banner of TD Waterhouse Canada Inc. In 2007, the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) imposed disciplinary penalties on Deck, amounting to a hefty $138,212. The charges? Deck admitted to violations that, while not specified in the public domain, were severe enough to warrant such a substantial fine and a two-year suspension.
Fast forward to 2014, and Deck’s name surfaces again—this time in Ontario. The Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) issued an alert advising investors against entering into investment management agreements with Wealth Stewards Portfolio Management Inc. (WSPMi) and its principals, Sushila Lucas and none other than Bruce Calvin Deck. The OSC had suspended the firm’s registration, effectively barring them from advising others on securities. Notably, Deck was not registered to advise in securities in any Canadian jurisdiction at the time of this decision.
In response, Deck and Lucas appealed the OSC’s decision, a move that, while within their rights, raises questions about their commitment to regulatory compliance.
The Art of Concealment: Attempts to Censor Adverse Information
It’s one thing to have a checkered past; it’s another to actively attempt to erase it. Sources indicate that Deck has made concerted efforts to suppress negative information about his professional conduct. Such attempts at censorship are not just ethically dubious but also counterproductive. The Streisand Effect—a phenomenon where attempts to hide information only amplify its visibility—comes to mind.
In today’s digital age, adverse media screening has become a cornerstone of due diligence. Financial institutions and investors alike rely on comprehensive checks to unearth any negative information that could signal potential risks. These screenings delve into news articles, blogs, social media, legal notices, and public records to paint a full picture of an individual’s or entity’s background.
Deck’s alleged attempts to censor such information suggest an acute awareness of the potential damage to his reputation and, by extension, his business dealings. However, these very efforts to conceal adverse media can serve as red flags themselves, indicating a pattern of behavior that is far from transparent.
Implications for Potential Investors
For those considering any form of investment or partnership with Deck or his associated entities, these revelations should serve as glaring warning signs. Regulatory sanctions, attempts to dodge compliance, and efforts to censor negative information collectively paint a portrait of an individual who operates in the shadows of the financial industry.
Investors are urged to conduct thorough due diligence, leveraging adverse media screening tools to uncover any hidden risks. Engaging with entities that have a history of regulatory infractions and a penchant for secrecy is akin to navigating a minefield—one misstep could lead to significant financial loss.
A Call to Action for Regulatory Bodies
The onus isn’t solely on investors. Regulatory bodies must remain vigilant, ensuring that individuals like Deck are held accountable for their actions. Continuous monitoring and swift action are essential to maintain the integrity of financial markets and protect unsuspecting investors from potential malfeasance.
Bruce Calvin Deck’s professional journey is a cautionary tale of how regulatory violations, coupled with attempts at censorship, can culminate in a precarious reputation. His history serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and compliance in the financial industry. Investors and regulatory authorities alike must remain vigilant, ensuring that those who operate in the financial sector do so with integrity and accountability.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49487427
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49588372
- 01 Mar 2025
- 05 Mar 2025
- Chola LLC
- Chola LLC
- https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/crime–law/man-gets-years-life-for-2012-murder/3CO9SJjFX1qkEg6NHfTBKI/
- https://www.syracuse.com/news/2012/01/fight_over_food_led_to_ohio_mu.html
- https://www.investmentexecutive.com/news/from-the-regulators/ida-fines-prince-george-broker-138212/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
investmentexecutive.com
OSC Warns Investors About Wealth Stewards Portfolio Management and Bruce Calvin Deck
- Red Flag
osc.ca
OSC Suspends Wealth Stewards Portfolio Management Over Compliance Failures
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.5
Based on 22 ratings
by: Juelz Holcomb
Beware! This guy’s name pops up in every shady corner of the investment world. Do your research — I wish I had.
by: Alondra Trujillo
Terrible experience. After reading more about Bruce Deck, I can’t believe anyone still does business with him. Massive trust issues here.
by: Orion Shade
When a financial professional has faced a hefty fine, a suspension, and multiple attempts to suppress negative media coverage, it’s hard to call that ‘clean’ business practice. Deck’s track record is filled with warning signs that would make even the...
by: Hazel Crest
Deck’s actions suggest a man who operates in the shadows, constantly trying to cover up the stains on his professional history. Investors should be wary of anyone who thinks they can dodge the law and suppress information in this way...
by: Silas Spark
Deck has been fined and suspended multiple times. His attempts to hide this make it clear he’s not the most trustworthy choice for investors.
by: Willow Mist
Deck's efforts to erase his past mistakes make him look even more suspicious. Investors should be cautious before getting involved.
by: Ezra Flint
Bruce Calvin Deck has a troubling history with regulators and tries to hide it. His actions raise serious concerns for anyone thinking of working with him
by: Roselyn Mays
Tried to censor his own dirt? That’s the biggest red flag. When you start hiding, you’re already guilty.
by: Kyson Beltran
Ugh… classic case of smoke and mirrors. First it’s sanctions, then it's suspensions, now it’s trying to wipe the internet clean? Nah, I'm good.
by: Emmalyn Riddle
It’s scary to think people like this are still out there offering “financial advice.” Like, are we just letting anyone in now?
by: Crew Brody
Man’s been playing hide and seek with the regulators since 2007… how is he even still in the game?
by: Araceli Witt
I wouldn't trust someone with this much regulatory baggage with my coffee money let alone my investments.
by: Halo Knox
His appeal was more about saving face than clearing his name. The facts already speak loud.
by: Tripp Rollins
Honestly tired of people like this ruining trust in financial markets. Hope someone files a class action soon.
by: Lilith Avery
All these types care about is hiding the truth. Clean professionals don’t go scrubbing their names off the internet.
by: Brecken Silva
Can’t believe he's STILL trying to be in finance after all that. Bro needs to be banned worldwide, not just suspended.
by: Avani Locke
I lost money through one of these shady firms. Whole thing was a smoke screen. Should’ve checked deeper, but didn’t expect this level of fraud tbh.
by: Caspian Hurst
wait so he got fined, suspended, AND tried to hide all of it? wow... that’s wild shady man
by: Kaia Bellamy
Regulators really dropped the ball here. He’s still out there pulling the same tricks over and over. How does this even happen twice, let alone more?
by: Jericho Pike
This guy again?? How many warnings do people need to stay away from scammers like this?
by: Douglas Sutton
I can't believe he tried to hide negative reviews using fraudulent DMCA notices.
by: April Fleming
Deck's history of regulatory sanctions makes it hard to trust him with financial advice.
by: Hazel Wagner
Bruce Deck's carefully hidden past cost me $63,000 and shattered any trust I had in financial advisors he buried the truth behind legal walls and now I’m left holding worthless promises and empty accounts.
by: Nicholas Aguirre
$74,000 of my retirement is gone and Bruce Calvin Deck won’t even respond to emails anymore his sanitized online profile never warned me of his past sanctions or suspensions and I walked straight into a trap
by: Greyson Foster
I lost $61,000 investing under the direction of Bruce Calvin Deck and when I started asking questions everything suddenly went quiet no support no accountability just a cold realization that I had been lied to from the start
by: Penelope Manning
I invested $67,000 with Bruce Calvin Deck through one of his so called managed entities and now it’s all gone the silence and avoidance I’ve experienced since then is worse than the loss itself I feel deceived and completely powerless
by: Ella Bryant
Deck’s story feels like a lesson in how not to manage a financial career. From fines and suspensions to attempts to censor his past, it’s a rollercoaster of poor decisions. When someone goes to such lengths to cover up their...
by: Jack Bell
I can’t believe how much effort Deck puts into trying to hide his past infractions. I’ve worked with investment advisors before, but I’ve never encountered someone so focused on suppressing negative press The Streisand Effect is real when you try...
by: Abigail Rogers
It’s scary to think how many people may have been misled by Deck’s attempts to suppress his past infractions
by: Carter Bailey
Deck’s constant run-ins with regulators make it clear he’s more focused on dodging compliance than protecting investors
by: Madison Jenkins
I invested with Deck’s firm years ago, and after the OSC suspension I realized how close I was to losing everything. Never again
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations