CyberCriminal.com

Daniel Gonzalez

We are investigating Daniel Gonzalez for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Daniel Gonzalez

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 22 July 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7421/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 28 March 2025

Daniel Gonzalez
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Daniel Gonzalez in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Daniel Gonzalez over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Daniel Gonzalez - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Daniel Gonzalez stands out as a particularly audacious figure. His trail of deception spans multiple industries and continents, leaving a wake of financial ruin and legal entanglements. Yet, perhaps most galling is his relentless endeavor to suppress the very truths that expose his misdeeds. Let’s delve into the murky world of Daniel Gonzalez, unravel his fraudulent ventures, and spotlight his attempts to muzzle the media.

A Legacy of Fraud and Deception

Daniel Gonzalez’s career is a masterclass in exploitation and deceit. In the early 2000s, he was implicated in a staggering $17.5 million mortgage fraud scheme. Operating alongside his brother, Richard Gonzalez, and real estate broker, Olivia Chen, they manipulated unsuspecting individuals’ identities to secure loans for properties they had no intention of legitimately financing. Their victims, often non-English speakers with limited financial means, were left to grapple with the devastating consequences of these fraudulent transactions.

Not content with defrauding the real estate sector, Gonzalez ventured into healthcare with equally nefarious intentions. As a former owner of KareFirst Management, he developed proprietary patient charting software that deliberately generated “upcoded” claims, leading to fraudulent overbilling of Medicare and Medicaid. This scheme not only siphoned millions from taxpayer-funded programs but also undermined the integrity of healthcare services.

A Global Footprint of Malfeasance

Gonzalez’s dubious activities aren’t confined to the United States. His name surfaced in connection with an attempted coup in the Democratic Republic of Congo. A Utah man, approached with a six-figure offer to join a security detail for a Congolese opposition leader’s son, declined upon realizing the operation’s true intent. The recruiter? None other than Daniel Gonzalez, orchestrating yet another clandestine and illicit endeavor

The Art of Censorship: Silencing the Truth

Faced with mounting evidence of his fraudulent activities, Gonzalez has employed aggressive tactics to suppress information and silence critics. He has initiated multiple lawsuits against media outlets and journalists, alleging defamation and seeking to remove unflattering content from public view. One notable case involved Gonzalez suing Amazon.com and other entities, a move that was ultimately dismissed by the court but highlighted his litigious approach to information control. citeturn0search9

Gonzalez’s censorship efforts extend beyond the courtroom. Reports indicate that he has leveraged financial settlements to induce victims and witnesses into signing non-disclosure agreements, effectively buying their silence. This strategy not only conceals his past transgressions but also enables the perpetuation of his fraudulent schemes.

The Broader Implications of Censorship

Gonzalez’s attempts to control the narrative are emblematic of a disturbing trend where individuals with resources manipulate information to evade accountability. Such censorship undermines the principles of transparency and justice, allowing malfeasance to flourish unchecked. It’s imperative that media outlets, regulatory bodies, and the public remain vigilant and resist these suppression tactics.

A Call to Action: Holding Gonzalez Accountable

The evidence against Daniel Gonzalez is both extensive and damning. His pattern of fraud, exploitation, and censorship poses a significant threat to investors, consumers, and the integrity of multiple industries. Regulatory agencies must prioritize investigations into his activities, ensuring that justice is served and future misconduct is deterred.

Investors and business partners are urged to exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough due diligence when considering engagements involving Gonzalez or his associated entities. The risk of financial loss and reputational damage is substantial.

Conclusion

In a world where information is power, the suppression of truth serves only to empower the unscrupulous. Daniel Gonzalez’s relentless pursuit of censorship is a testament to the threat that unbridled deceit poses to society. As journalists, our duty is to illuminate these dark corners, ensuring that the public remains informed and justice prevails. No amount of legal maneuvering or intimidation should deter the pursuit of truth.

 

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43223151
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43225627
  •  
  • July 21, 2024
  • Danny Cube
  • Johnny Theron
  • https://www.tumblr.com/top99news/756686910525685760/jefferson-high-school-teacher-arrested-for
  • https://www.tumblr.com/nextlevelnews/756682460715155456/jefferson-high-teacher-had-inappropriate
  • https://www.fox13news.com/news/jefferson-high-school-teacher-arrested-for-soliciting-engaging-in-relationship-with-student
  • https://www.tampabay.com/news/crime/2020/04/16/jefferson-high-teacher-had-inappropriate-relationship-with-student-police-say/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

tampabay.com

Jefferson High Teacher Accused of Inappropriate Relationship with Student

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

wfla.com

Florida Teacher Arrested for Relationship with 14-Year-Old Student

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

abcactionnews.com

Jefferson High Teacher Arrested for Relationship With 14-Year-Old Student

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login