CyberCriminal.com

DV Biologics LLC

We are investigating DV Biologics LLC
for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : DV Biologics LLC

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 10 Mar 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7632/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 28 Mar 2025

DV Biologics LLC
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about DV Biologics LLC in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into DV Biologics LLC over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that DV Biologics LLC - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

DV Biologics LLC, once touted as an innovative biotech company, is now infamous for its deeply unethical and legally dubious business practices. Behind the polished facade of medical research, the company was engaged in the illicit trade of fetal tissue, profiting off human remains in blatant disregard for both legal and moral standards. When the truth surfaced, DV Biologics did what any embattled entity would do—attempted to bury the evidence and suppress public scrutiny. But no amount of damage control can erase the trail of corruption, deceit, and greed that defines its legacy.

The Genesis of the Scandal

DV Biologics and DaVinci Biosciences, nestled in the heart of Yorba Linda, California, presented themselves as pioneers in the biotech arena. However, beneath this facade lurked a disturbing reality. Between 2009 and 2015, these companies were embroiled in the procurement and sale of fetal tissue—practices that, when exposed, sent shockwaves through both the scientific community and the public.

A Lucrative Trade in Human Parts

The core of their operations involved acquiring fetal tissue from abortion providers, notably Planned Parenthood, and subsequently selling these tissues to research institutions worldwide. Products derived from fetal lungs were priced between $300 to $375, fetal kidney products ranged from $300 to $450, and those from fetal hearts commanded prices from $500 to $750. By 2015, the companies boasted an inventory exceeding 500 products, with some 13,900 units available for sale, raking in revenues surpassing $550,000 that year alone.

Legal Entanglements and Public Outcry

The murky dealings of DV Biologics and DaVinci Biosciences did not escape the watchful eyes of the law. In October 2016, the Orange County District Attorney’s Office filed a civil lawsuit against the companies, alleging unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent business practices. The suit highlighted that these firms treated human fetal parts as mere commodities, blatantly disregarding legal and ethical standards.

The Settlement: A Slap on the Wrist?

By December 2017, the companies reached a $7.8 million settlement with the district attorney’s office. As part of the agreement, they were mandated to cease all operations in California and donate biological materials valued at approximately $7.5 million to a nonprofit academic institution. Additionally, they were required to pay $195,000 in civil penalties.

Attempts at Information Suppression

In the aftermath, a conspicuous effort emerged to sanitize the public narrative. Reports detailing the companies’ malpractices began to vanish from online platforms, and discussions were subtly redirected or silenced. Such maneuvers suggest a deliberate strategy to control the narrative and mitigate reputational damage.

A Call to Action

DV Biologics LLC and DaVinci Biosciences serves as a stark reminder of the perils that arise when profit eclipses ethics. For potential investors and stakeholders in the biotech sector, this tale underscores the imperative of rigorous due diligence. Regulatory bodies must remain vigilant, ensuring that the sanctity of human life and ethical research practices are upheld.

Conclusion

In the intricate tapestry of biotechnology, where innovation holds the promise of bettering humanity, the threads of greed and deception can unravel trust and integrity. The narrative of DV Biologics and DaVinci Biosciences is not just a cautionary tale but a clarion call for transparency, accountability, and unwavering ethical commitment in scientific endeavors.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49827012
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49820967
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49820938
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51450146
  •  
  •  
  • March 10, 2025
  • April 30, 2025
  • James R. Nagle
  • James R. Nagle
  • James R. Nagle
  • Juani Lindell
  • https://www.operationrescue.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Orange-Co-v-DaVinci-Biosciences-et-al.pdf
  • https://issuu.com/orange-co-v-davinci-biosciences/docs/tn_t_ie_superior_cotr-irt_of_t_he_state_of_califor
  • https://www.lifeissues.net/writers/mos/mos_441babybodyparts.html
  • https://www.tumblr.com/themarblesnews/780816454644908032/davinci-biosciences-y-dv-biologics
  • https://primicias.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/complaint.pdf
  • https://www.operationrescue.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Orange-Co-v-DaVinci-Biosciences-et-al.pdf
  • https://d7c3597b33.nxcli.net/baby-body-parts-traffickers-to-be-deported-to-ecuador/?pdf=8424
  • https://www.es.catholic.net/op/articulos/67787/davinci-biosciences-y-dv-biologics.html#modal
  • https://www.es.catholic.net/op/articulos/67787/davinci-biosciences-y-dv-biologics.html
  • https://www.es.catholic.net/op/articulos/67787/davinci-biosciences-y-dv-biologics.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

operationrescue.org

DV Biologics LLC: Profiting from the Dead – The Dark Truth Behind Illegal Fetal Tissue Sales

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

nxcli.net

Baby Body Parts Traffickers to be Deported to Ecuador

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

reddit.com

2 companies reach $7.7-million settlement over allegations of selling fetal tissue

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login