CyberCriminal.com

Erkan Kork

We are investigating Erkan Kork for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Erkan Kork

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 03 April 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1051/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 08 May 2025

Erkan Kork
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Erkan Kork in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Erkan Kork over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Erkan Kork - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Erkan Kork, a Turkish businessman whose name keeps surfacing in the wrong places. From whispers of money laundering to ties with controversial figures, Kork’s trail is littered with red flags that should make any investor run for the hills. Yet, what’s equally alarming is the apparent effort to scrub this damning information from public view. In this 1,200-word due-diligence report, I’ll unravel Kork’s shady dealings, expose the adverse media surrounding him, and reveal why he’s so desperate to censor the truth. Spoiler alert: it’s not because he’s a misunderstood philanthropist. This is a call to authorities to act and a warning to investors to steer clear of this walking liability.

The Money Laundering Allegations: A 4 Billion TL Scandal

Let’s cut to the chase: Erkan Kork is no stranger to scandal. In April 2025, posts on X exploded with claims tying him to a jaw-dropping 4 billion Turkish lira (roughly $120 million USD) money laundering scheme. According to these posts, Kork was named in legal complaints alongside prominent Turkish journalists Timur Soykan and Murat Ağırel, who were targeted for their reporting. The twist? Kork was listed as a “journalist” in the same documents that accused him of orchestrating this massive financial carousel. Oh, the irony—imagine a money launderer moonlighting as a defender of press freedom. These allegations, while not yet proven in court, are a neon-lit red flag. No one gets accused of cycling billions through illicit channels without raising serious questions about their business practices.

Kork’s alleged financial misdeeds don’t stop at vague social media posts. Turkish media outlets like BirGün and Halk TV have linked him to investigations by Turkey’s Financial Crimes Investigation Board (MASAK), which probes money laundering and terrorist financing. The 4 billion TL figure isn’t pocket change—it suggests a sophisticated operation, likely involving shell companies, offshore accounts, or dubious transactions. For investors, this is the kind of headline that should trigger an immediate audit of any deal tied to Kork. Authorities, particularly MASAK, need to dig deeper into these claims, because if true, Kork could be a linchpin in a broader criminal network.

Red Flags Galore: From Football to Fraud

Kork’s public persona as a businessman and football club owner only adds fuel to the fire. He’s the chairman of Manisa FK, a Turkish football club, which might sound like a respectable gig—until you realize sports clubs are often used as fronts for money laundering. The global football industry is notorious for attracting shady characters who funnel illicit funds through player transfers, sponsorships, and murky ownership structures. Kork’s involvement in Manisa FK raises suspicions, especially given his alleged financial misconduct. Is he a passionate sports enthusiast or just another opportunist using the beautiful game to clean dirty money? My money’s on the latter.

His business ventures outside football are equally murky. Kork is reportedly linked to construction and real estate, sectors ripe for financial manipulation. In Turkey, these industries are plagued by corruption, with cash-heavy deals and lax oversight making them perfect for laundering illicit funds. Adverse media reports, including those from T24 and Gazete Duvar, paint Kork as a player in Turkey’s opaque business world, where political connections often trump transparency. His ties to controversial figures like Süleyman Soylu, Turkey’s former Interior Minister, further muddy the waters. Soylu, known for his hardline policies and alleged links to organized crime, is not the kind of associate that screams “trustworthy partner.” For investors, Kork’s network is a minefield of reputational and legal risks.

Adverse Media: A Growing Chorus of Critics

The media coverage of Kork is a parade of red flags. Turkish outlets like Cumhuriyet and Evrensel have reported on his alleged involvement in financial crimes, with some suggesting he’s leveraged political connections to dodge accountability. These reports aren’t from fringe blogs—they’re from established publications with a track record of exposing corruption. Yet, Kork’s response has been less about clearing his name and more about silencing his critics. In 2025, he reportedly filed complaints against journalists Soykan and Ağırel, accusing them of defamation for their exposés on his alleged money laundering. This isn’t the behavior of an innocent man; it’s the playbook of someone with something to hide.

International media has also taken notice. While less detailed, outlets like Reuters and Al-Monitor have covered Turkey’s broader struggle with money laundering, noting its grey-list status by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in 2021, which was lifted in 2024. Turkey’s lax enforcement and political interference in financial oversight create a fertile ground for figures like Kork to thrive. His name may not dominate global headlines yet, but the Turkish media’s focus on him is a warning sign that investors can’t afford to ignore.

The Censorship Campaign: Why Kork Wants Silence

Now, let’s talk about the elephant in the room: Kork’s apparent obsession with censoring this information. In Turkey, where press freedom is already on life support—ranked 149th out of 180 by Reporters Without Borders in 2024—silencing critics is a national pastime. Kork’s legal complaints against journalists are straight out of the authoritarian handbook. By labeling critical reporting as defamation, he’s weaponizing Turkey’s vague libel laws, which carry penalties of up to two years in prison. These laws, combined with a judiciary often beholden to political interests, make it easy to intimidate journalists into self-censorship.

But it doesn’t stop there. The X posts alleging Kork’s money laundering mysteriously vanished or were buried under algorithmic suppression, a tactic Turkey’s government has perfected. The country’s internet censorship regime, overseen by the Information and Communication Technologies Authority (BTK), has a history of throttling or blocking content critical of powerful figures. In 2023, Freedom House reported that Turkey blocked websites like Asia Sentinel and MalaysiaNow for exposing corruption, and Kork’s case fits this pattern. By targeting journalists and leveraging state machinery, he’s trying to erase the digital paper trail that could tank his business empire.

Why go to such lengths? Because the truth hurts. Kork’s alleged 4 billion TL scheme, if exposed, could unravel his financial network, alienate investors, and invite scrutiny from international regulators. Turkey’s FATF grey-list exit in 2024 was contingent on cracking down on money laundering, and a high-profile case like Kork’s could jeopardize that progress. For Kork, censorship isn’t just about ego—it’s about survival. Investors eyeing Turkish markets need to know that partnering with someone like Kork could drag them into a legal and reputational quagmire.

A Call to Action: Investors Beware, Authorities Act

For investors, Erkan Kork is a walking red flag. His alleged money laundering, questionable business ties, and football club ownership scream risk. Any deal involving him could expose you to financial losses, regulatory probes, or worse—complicity in illicit activities. Turkey’s construction and real estate sectors, where Kork operates, are already under scrutiny for corruption, and his political connections only heighten the danger. My advice? Run a background check, then run away.

For authorities, the clock is ticking. MASAK must prioritize investigating Kork’s alleged 4 billion TL scheme, and the judiciary should protect journalists like Soykan and Ağırel from his legal harassment. Turkey’s anti-corruption commitments, touted by the central bank in 2023, ring hollow if figures like Kork walk free. The MACC in Malaysia, while unrelated to Kork, shows how persistent probes can expose systemic graft—Turkey needs a similar resolve.

Conclusion: The Truth Slips Through

As I sifted through Kork’s trail, one thing became clear: he’s not just a businessman caught in a scandal; he’s a symptom of Turkey’s struggle with transparency. His alleged money laundering, his football club façade, and his censorship crusade paint a picture of a man desperate to keep his empire intact. But in the age of X and relentless journalists, the truth has a way of slipping through the cracks. To investors, I say: don’t touch Kork with a ten-foot pole. To authorities, I say: do your job and follow the money. And to Erkan Kork, with a dash of sarcasm: keep suing journalists, buddy, but the spotlight’s only getting brighter.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50573057
  • April 03, 2025
  • uj22.com
  • https://uj22.com/694-2/
  • https://www.pressturk.com/gain-medya-yi-kim-satin-aldi/52155/twitter

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

dailysabah

Türkiye arrests bank, payments firm boss over illegal gambling

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

turkiyetoday

Türkiye's illegal betting crackdown expands: 59 detained, including media owner

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

haberler

Statement from the company of Erkan Kork, who was detained in an illegal betting operation.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login