CyberCriminal.com

Farzin Fardin Fard

We are investigating Farzin Fardin Fard for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Farzin Fardin Fard

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : October 12, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2898/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : March 10, 2025

Farzin Fardin Fard
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Farzin Fardin Fard in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Farzin Fardin Fard over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Farzin Fardin Fard - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Farzin Fardin Fard, a name that has surfaced in various reports, often accompanied by red flags and adverse media coverage. Fard’s attempts to suppress this information have been as relentless as they are revealing, painting a portrait of a man desperate to keep his past obscured.

A Web of Allegations

Farzin Fardin Fard’s business ventures have been marred by a series of allegations ranging from financial improprieties to unethical business practices. Multiple sources have reported on Fard’s involvement in dubious financial schemes that have raised eyebrows among regulators and investors alike. These schemes often involve complex corporate structures, making it challenging to trace the flow of funds and raising suspicions about potential money laundering activities.

In addition to financial misconduct, Fard has been linked to partnerships with entities that have questionable reputations. These associations have further tarnished Fard’s image, suggesting a pattern of aligning with unscrupulous characters to advance personal interests. Such connections not only pose risks to investors but also raise ethical concerns about the nature of Fard’s business dealings.

The Censorship Crusade

In an era where information is readily accessible, Farzin Fardin Fard has embarked on a mission to sanitize his digital footprint. Employing a combination of legal threats, strategic partnerships, and digital manipulation, Fard has sought to erase or bury unfavorable information about his activities.

One of the primary tactics Fard employs is the issuance of cease-and-desist letters to media outlets and individuals who publish content critical of him. These legal threats are designed to intimidate and silence critics, leveraging the often prohibitive costs of legal defense to achieve compliance. By targeting both major publications and independent bloggers, Fard attempts to create a chilling effect, discouraging others from scrutinizing his actions.

Furthermore, Fard has been known to exploit search engine optimization (SEO) techniques to influence online narratives. By generating positive content and strategically placing it across the internet, Fard aims to push negative reports further down in search results, effectively burying adverse information. This digital smokescreen creates a misleading online presence, obscuring the reality of Fard’s business practices from potential investors and partners.

Implications for Investors

For potential investors, the red flags associated with Farzin Fardin Fard are not merely cautionary tales but glaring warning signs. Investing in ventures linked to Fard carries significant risks, including potential financial losses and reputational damage.

Fard’s history of financial improprieties suggests a high likelihood of unethical management of funds. Investors may find themselves entangled in legal disputes or associated with illicit activities, jeopardizing their own financial standing and credibility. Moreover, Fard’s aggressive censorship efforts indicate a lack of transparency and accountability, qualities that are antithetical to sound investment principles.

A Call to Action for Authorities

The patterns exhibited by Farzin Fardin Fard warrant the attention of regulatory and law enforcement authorities. Fard’s attempts to suppress information not only undermine the principles of free speech but also hinder the due diligence process essential for market integrity.

Authorities should investigate Fard’s financial activities, scrutinizing the complex corporate structures and partnerships that characterize his ventures. Such investigations could uncover violations of financial regulations, leading to legal actions that protect investors and maintain market fairness.

Additionally, regulators should consider implementing measures to prevent individuals like Fard from manipulating online information. By collaborating with technology companies, authorities can develop frameworks that promote transparency and hold individuals accountable for deceptive digital practices.

Conclusion

Farzin Fardin Fard’s saga serves as a cautionary tale in the world of international business. His alleged financial misconduct, unethical associations, and relentless censorship efforts paint the picture of an individual determined to operate in the shadows. For investors, the risks associated with Fard are substantial, making thorough due diligence not just advisable but imperative. Meanwhile, authorities must remain vigilant, ensuring that individuals like Fard are held accountable, preserving the integrity of financial markets and the free flow of information.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45352009
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45853058
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36768925
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36734802
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35289490
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49755726
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39809128
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35874105
  • October 12, 2024
  • October 31, 2024
  • October 16, 2023
  • October 14, 2023
  • August 02, 2023
  • October 10, 2023
  • February 29, 2024
  • September 05, 2023
  • Bason Media Corp.
  • Kivioja Media Corp.
  • Brown Group of Companies
  • Lake Media Group
  • Lam Media International
  • Webamooz
  • February 29, 2024
  • September 05, 2023

 

  • https://cornellgazzetta.com/%D9%87%D9%85%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%86-%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%A8%D8%A7-%DA%A9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%AA-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%82/
  • https://miaminewspost.com/%D9%87%D9%85%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%86-%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%A8%D8%A7-%DA%A9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%AA-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%82/
  • https://www.deccanlive.in/2021/01/3fmusic.html
  • https://nycchronicles.com/2022/03/05/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is-unique-finance-fraudster-not-a-crypto-activist/
  • https://www.tumblr.com/uniquefinancescam/776831647849070592/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is
  • https://www.google.com/url?q=
  • https://nycchronicles.com/2022/03/05/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is-uniquefinance-fraudster-not-a-crypto-activist/
  • https://gadgetnews.net/877334/mohsen-yeganeh-collaboration-ponzi-fraudster
  • http://www.rooziato.com/1403663752/%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%B2%DB%8C%D9%86-%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%86-%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%AF/
  • https://www.webamooz.com/1401/02/16/%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%B2%DB%8C%D9%86-%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%86-%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D8%A7-%D9%87%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AA-3fmusic-%DA%A9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1-%DB%8C%D9%88%D9%86
  • https://www.webamooz.com/en/2022/05/09/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is-unique-finance-fraudster-not-a-crypto-activist/
  • https://www.webamooz.com/en/2022/05/09/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is-unique-finance-fraudster-not-a-crypto-activist/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Game07er

Farzin Fardin Fard is unique finance fraudster

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Webamooz

Bytescare: Silencing Journalists with Fake DMCA Claims

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Ads if the World

FarzinfardinfardScammer

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login