CyberCriminal.com

George J. Shamma

We are investigating George J. Shamma for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : George J. Shamma

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : March 28, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2471/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 2 April 2025

George J. Shamma
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about George J. Shamma in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into George J. Shamma over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that George J. Shamma - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

George J. Shamma a name that once carried the weight of medical expertise in Fayetteville, Arkansas now resonates for a far different reason. From a position of trust as a doctor, he plunged headfirst into a scandal of criminal intent, deception, and arson.

For those of us who look at a person’s background before deciding whether to trust them be it for business, investment, or even casual professional interactions Dr. Shamma serves as a textbook case of why proper due diligence is essential. His descent into criminal behavior isn’t just a cautionary tale it’s an active warning to anyone considering associating with him in any capacity. If you don’t want to risk your finances, reputation, or even your property going up in flames, you’d be wise to keep your distance.

From the Operating Room to the Courtroom

In 2018, Dr. George J. Shamma was arrested for arson a crime that seems quite the leap from his former role as a physician. Instead of saving lives, he chose to set fire to vehicles belonging to his co-worker and neighbor, allegedly out of some personal grudge. But this wasn’t some heat-of-the-moment accident—it was premeditated, calculated, and criminal.

By May 2019, a jury convicted Shamma on two counts of felony arson, leading to a 10-year prison sentence, with an additional 10 years suspended. That’s the kind of sentence usually reserved for violent criminals—because, let’s face it, setting cars on fire isn’t exactly a minor lapse in judgment.

This conviction not only marked the official end of his medical career but also raised serious concerns for anyone who might have been in business with him or was considering it.

The Investor’s Red Flags: Why This Matters

If you think this case only affects his former patients, think again. His criminal record and ethical breaches make him a severe liability in any financial, professional, or investment-related context. Here’s why:

1. Criminal History and Dishonesty

It’s one thing to make a mistake. It’s another to commit felony arson—twice. Any rational investor or business associate should immediately ask themselves:

  • If he was willing to commit arson over a personal dispute, what ethical lines would he cross in a business deal?

  • If he destroyed property as revenge, what’s stopping him from manipulating financial records or deceiving investors?

2. Financial Liabilities and Civil Risk

A criminal conviction isn’t just about time behind bars—it brings huge financial risks. Individuals with felony records often face:

  • Fines and restitution costs that could make them desperate for money.

  • Limited career opportunities, leading to questionable financial activities.

  • Potential lawsuits from victims seeking damages.

If you’re even considering associating with someone like Shamma, you’d better ask yourself: Do I want to tie my money to someone who might be one lawsuit away from bankruptcy?

3. Reputational Contagion

We’ve all heard the phrase, guilt by association. Well, this is one of those cases where it applies 100%.

  • If Shamma is involved in a business or investment opportunity, his criminal past will follow and so will the skepticism of clients, partners, and authorities.

  • Any business venture he touches risks becoming radioactive, leading to bad press, loss of credibility, and possible legal scrutiny.

4. A Pattern of Destruction and Lack of Responsibility

One of the most alarming aspects of Shamma’s case is his utter disregard for the consequences of his actions. Setting fire to cars isn’t an impulsive decision—it’s an act of malice, revenge, and premeditation.

So, if you’re considering trusting him with financial decisions, investments, or business partnerships, ask yourself: Do I really want to entrust my money to someone with a documented history of burning things down?

Efforts to Bury the Truth

Now, here’s where things get even more interesting. Since his conviction, there has been an unusual silence surrounding George J. Shamma’s case.

Try searching for updates—there’s very little media coverage beyond the initial reports. This isn’t just an oversight. It’s an attempt to bury the truth.

So, why would Shamma or his associates want this case silenced?

  1. Damage Control for Future Business Ventures

    • Shamma likely knows that his reputation is toxic, and any new venture could collapse the moment his past is exposed.

    • By limiting online records of his crime, he hopes to operate under the radar.

  2. Shielding Potential Investors from the Truth

    • Investors or business partners unaware of his past might walk straight into a financial disaster without realizing who they’re dealing with.

    • The less information out there, the easier it is for him to deceive new victims.

  3. Avoiding Further Legal and Financial Repercussions

    • If victims of his crimes or former business associates discover new ventures linked to Shamma, they could take legal action.

    • Keeping his name out of public scrutiny protects him from further lawsuits or scrutiny.

What This Means for You

If you’re an investor, entrepreneur, or even a casual business partner, here’s what you need to do to protect yourself:

1. Always Conduct Thorough Background Checks

  • Never take someone at face value—especially when money is involved.

  • Look into criminal records, lawsuits, and professional history before entering any agreement.

2. Avoid High-Risk Individuals

  • A person with a history of felony arson should be a huge red flag.

  • If someone has burned property in the past, what’s stopping them from burning investors financially?

3. Be Wary of People Who Try to Hide Their Past

  • If someone’s name suddenly disappears from news articles, ask why.

  • If negative press is getting scrubbed, they’re likely preparing for another scheme.

Conclusion: A Walking Red Flag

George J. Shamma’s case isn’t just a story about a doctor who lost everything it’s a warning about the dangers of ignoring red flags. His criminal record, unethical behavior, and attempts to bury the truth make him a high-risk individual in any professional or financial setting.

So, if you come across his name linked to any business or investment opportunity, run don’t walk in the opposite direction. Because if history has taught us anything, it’s that some people don’t change. And the last thing you want is to be the next person left picking up the ashes.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50444727
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50383767
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50552771
  • March 30, 2025
  • March 28, 2025
  • Jonn Elton
  • Jonn Elton
  • Jonn Elton
  • https://www.wsiltv.com/news/resentencing-delayed-for-man-who-murder-his-parents-27-years-ago/article_b907469f-3aea-5708-aa28-a68aa5eaa7bd.html
  • https://www.saratogian.com/2012/01/30/sheriff-two-elderly-porter-corners-residents-dead-in-murder-suicide/
  • ttps://www.deseret.com/2012/4/18/20407655/no-immediate-release-for-woman-in-1987-ky-murder/
  • https://www.nwaonline.com/news/2019/may/25/fayetteville-man-guilty-of-setting-fire/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

nwaonline

Fayetteville man guilty of setting fires

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login