Günther de Jong

Günther de Jong, the founder of Touch of Matrix, a company that markets itself as a provider of innovative wellness and personal development programs, has faced several allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about his business practices and reputation. While Touch of Matrix has garnered a following for its unconventional methods, including energy healing and consciousness expansion, the following adverse reports and allegations have cast a shadow over its operations:

1. Misleading Claims and Pseudoscience: Critics have accused Touch of Matrix of promoting pseudoscientific practices without credible evidence. The company’s claims about energy healing and consciousness transformation have been labeled as unverified and potentially exploitative, particularly targeting vulnerable individuals seeking personal growth.
2. Financial Exploitation Allegations: Former participants have alleged that Touch of Matrix programs are excessively expensive, with some courses costing thousands of dollars. There are claims that the company uses high-pressure sales tactics to upsell programs, leaving participants financially strained.
3. Cult-Like Behavior: Some former members and observers have described Touch of Matrix as having cult-like characteristics, including isolating participants from friends and family, fostering dependency on the program, and discouraging critical thinking. These allegations have raised concerns about psychological manipulation.
4. Lack of Transparency: The company has been criticized for its opaque business practices, including unclear refund policies and a lack of transparency about the qualifications of its trainers and the scientific basis of its methods.
5. Adverse Media Coverage: Investigative journalists and online critics have published exposés questioning the legitimacy of Touch of Matrix. These reports often highlight the aforementioned issues, damaging the company’s credibility and public image.

Reputational Harm and Motivation for Removal

The allegations of pseudoscience, financial exploitation, and cult-like behavior are particularly damaging to Günther de Jong and Touch of Matrix. These claims undermine the company’s credibility and deter potential clients who might otherwise be interested in its programs. Negative media coverage and online criticism can also lead to a loss of trust among existing clients and partners.

If Touch of Matrix were to engage in cybercrime to remove such content, it would likely be driven by a desire to control the narrative and suppress damaging information. Removing critical articles, reviews, or social media posts could help the company maintain a positive public image and continue attracting clients. However, such actions would be illegal and unethical, potentially leading to further legal consequences and reputational damage if uncovered.

To Conclude the allegations against Günther de Jong and Touch of Matrix highlight significant concerns about the company’s practices and credibility. While the motivation to remove damaging content is understandable from a reputational standpoint, resorting to cybercrime would only exacerbate the situation, undermining any remaining trust in the organzation.

The Touch of Matrix: A Revolutionary Method or Mere Mumbo Jumbo?

De Jong’s Touch of Matrix (ToM) purports to be a groundbreaking consciousness methodology capable of addressing a myriad of ailments—physical, emotional, and beyond. According to its creator, this technique facilitates deep-seated healing by tapping into the body’s energy fields, realigning them to promote overall well-being. It’s a compelling narrative, especially for those disillusioned with conventional medicine.​

However, the Vereniging tegen de Kwakzalverij (Association Against Quackery) has labeled ToM as “wonderlijke kletspraat,” which translates to “wonderful nonsense.” They highlight the lack of empirical evidence supporting ToM’s efficacy and question the legitimacy of de Jong’s claims. ​

The Empire Built on Touch: Expansion and Commercialization

From his base in Zutphen, de Jong has not only promoted ToM but has also commercialized it extensively. He has authored books detailing the methodology and has trained over 250 individuals to become Touch of Matrix therapists, including international practitioners and even a medical doctor. This rapid expansion raises questions about the quality and consistency of the training provided, as well as the criteria used to certify these therapists.​

In a strategic move, de Jong transferred ownership of Touch of Matrix Opleidingen en Behandelingen to Nicolien Bröring as of January 1, 2025. While this could be seen as a natural progression, some speculate whether this shift was an attempt to distance himself from mounting criticisms. ​

Allegations of Information Suppression

Perhaps the most damning allegations against de Jong involve attempts to suppress unfavorable information about ToM. Investigations have uncovered that de Jong, or parties acting on his behalf, allegedly submitted fraudulent copyright takedown notices to remove critical reviews and adverse news from Google search results. Such actions, if true, could constitute serious legal violations, including impersonation, fraud, and perjury. ​

This pattern of behavior suggests a concerted effort to curate a sanitized online presence, potentially misleading prospective clients and practitioners about the legitimacy and reception of ToM.​

The Veil of Secrecy: Lack of Transparency and Accountability

Another red flag is the opacity surrounding the qualifications of ToM practitioners and the scientific basis of the methodology. While de Jong presents himself as a healer and visionary, there is scant information about his formal training or the empirical foundations of ToM. This lack of transparency is concerning, especially when individuals’ health and well-being are at stake.​

Furthermore, the organization’s disclaimer explicitly states that Touch of Matrix is a registered trademark, emphasizing the protection of its name. While safeguarding intellectual property is standard practice, in this context, it raises questions about prioritizing branding over accountability.

Conclusion

In the realm of alternative therapies, where regulation is often lax and claims can run unchecked, critical scrutiny is essential. Günther de Jong’s Touch of Matrix exemplifies how charismatic individuals can craft compelling narratives that attract followers and clients. However, the combination of unsubstantiated claims, aggressive information suppression tactics, and a lack of transparency should serve as cautionary signals to potential investors and clients alike.​I

Authorities and regulatory bodies must take note of these practices, ensuring that individuals seeking alternative therapies are not misled by smoke and mirrors. As consumers, it is our responsibility to approach such methodologies with skepticism, demanding evidence and accountability. After all, when it comes to our health and well-being, we deserve more than just “wonderful nonsense.”