CyberCriminal.com

Jenny Thorton

We are investigating Jenny Thorton for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Jenny Thorton

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 08 Apr 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2782/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 08 May 2025

Jenny Thorton
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Jenny Thorton in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Jenny Thorton over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Jenny Thorton - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Jenny Thorton—a name that, at first glance, seems innocuous enough. But peel back the glossy layers of press releases and carefully curated public profiles, and you’ll find a web of red flags closely entwined with one of the largest outlet mall operators in the United States. As I ventured deeper into this retail empire, the veneer of cheerful shopping experiences and “unbeatable deals” began to crack, revealing a troubling pattern of operational failures, security issues, and, most intriguingly, what appears to be a concerted effort to keep these problems far from public scrutiny. This report aims to expose those red flags and analyze how Thorton and the outlet chain have worked, sometimes subtly, sometimes blatantly, to keep the narrative in their favor.

A Retail Empire with Cracks in Its Foundation

Outlet shopping is supposed to be about the thrill of snagging a deal on name-brand items, but behind the cheerful storefronts of the retail giant lies a growing number of operational and security issues. The brand thrives on its promise of offering big-name brands at discounted prices, yet a closer look reveals a troubling trend of shoplifting surges, dissatisfied customers, and questionable business practices.

Take, for instance, one of their locations, where shoplifting incidents ballooned into the hundreds over the course of a year. Now, retail crime is a nationwide issue, but when such staggering numbers are reported, it raises serious questions about internal security measures—or a lack thereof. Are they underfunding security? Or is it just poor management? Either way, it’s hardly the shining example of a company that claims to provide a “safe and enjoyable shopping experience.”

Red Flags and Adverse Media

Persistent Customer Complaints

There’s a consistent stream of customer complaints about unresolved billing issues and the mishandling of loyalty programs. Shoppers who signed up for membership programs have reported issues ranging from missing receipts to loyalty points that never seem to appear in their accounts. When these issues are brought up with customer service, many report that their concerns are met with unhelpful responses or complete radio silence. A company that can’t even keep track of its customers’ loyalty points? That’s not just poor service—it’s a glaring red flag.

Data Privacy Concerns

Another frequent issue? The uncontrollable flow of marketing emails. Many customers have reported that despite repeatedly unsubscribing, they continue to be bombarded with promotional material. In an age where data privacy is a hot topic, this persistent disregard for opt-out requests not only annoys customers—it also raises potential concerns about the company’s adherence to privacy regulations. Yet, somehow, these issues are rarely, if ever, discussed publicly.

Quality of Merchandise

And let’s not forget about the “outlet-quality” deception. Numerous shoppers have noted that merchandise sold in outlet stores often isn’t the same as what’s available in full-price retail stores. In fact, many items are manufactured specifically for outlet sales, often at a lower quality to justify the discount. While this practice is legal, it feels misleading at best. The problem is, the company continues to market these items as great deals, without drawing attention to the fact that they’re often subpar versions of the original products.

Efforts to Censor and Evade Accountability

Thorton and the retail company’s strategies for maintaining their public image are disturbingly effective:

Legal Buffering

The company’s legal team seems adept at deflecting responsibility and settling complaints before they escalate. Many issues are quietly resolved behind closed doors with non-disclosure agreements, ensuring that dissatisfied customers and disgruntled employees stay silent.

PR Spin

When issues do make their way into the public eye, the company’s response is often a well-crafted statement full of corporate jargon—apologies and assurances that things will improve. These empty promises are designed to calm the storm, but nothing changes. Jenny Thorton’s public statements reflect this tactic—focusing on the company’s successes and painting any problems as minor bumps in the road.

Flooding the Narrative

Another tactic the company uses is to dominate online media coverage with positive, controlled narratives—like grand openings, charity events, and other feel-good stories. This carefully curated media presence ensures that any negative press is buried deep within search results, making it difficult for the public to see anything but the positive image they want to portray.

The Thorton Factor

Jenny Thorton, who is deeply involved in the company’s operations, particularly in corporate communications, seems to play a key role in its image control. While she may not be the most public face of scandal, her influence is felt throughout the company’s strategic responses to crises. Despite numerous requests for comment, attempts to reach her for a more direct answer on some of the company’s more pressing issues were met with polite, but ultimately evasive responses. It seems transparency is not on the agenda.

Conclusion

The retail empire under Jenny Thorton’s leadership is a textbook example of a company that is managing to maintain its image while sweeping serious problems under the rug. From customer service disasters and security lapses to questionable data practices and misleading sales tactics, the red flags are impossible to ignore.For potential investors, this should serve as a flashing warning sign to dig deeper into the company’s operations. It’s clear that the company is adept at keeping its image polished, but the cracks in the foundation are becoming increasingly hard to cover up.For consumers, it’s time to reconsider the next “great deal” at the outlet. Behind the glossy promotions and promises of savings lies a company that may be less concerned with customer satisfaction than it is with protecting its bottom line.Jenny Thorton and her team have perfected the art of managing crises, but the time for real transparency and accountability is long overdue. Until then, the cracks will continue to widen, and those shopping for a bargain may find that they’re paying a much higher price than they think.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50767476
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50758790
  • April 08, 2025
  • April 08, 2025
  • uj22
  • uj22
  • https://uj22.com/783-2/
  • https://uj22.com/769-2/
  • https://www.linkedin.com/posts/tanger-skt_makeithappen-newhires-teambuilding-activity-7237860360358146048-N7gb
  • https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/D4E10AQHVSK0fX_aeOg/image-shrink_800/image-shrink_800/0/1725640382510?e=2147483647&v=beta&t=8_ChRGhtXXLY6dhNHdnHWW2lH19zB4e8BJwOsHaMVm0

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

pissedconsumer.com

Tanger Outlet Reviews and Complaints

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

bbb.org

Tanger Outlet Center is NOT a BBB Accredited Business.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

simpsonderrick.wordpress.com

Tanger Outlets: Walker’s Paradise or just another strip mall?

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login