Jonathan Wilhelm
We are investigating Jonathan Wilhelm for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Jonathan Wilhelm
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 8 July 2022
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 5742/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Jonathan Wilhelm over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Jonathan Wilhelm - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Jonathan Wilhelm, the owner of Pro Chiropractic and Big Sky Spinal Care Center Inc., has faced a series of allegations and adverse news reports that have raised significant concerns about his professional conduct and business practices. These allegations, ranging from unethical treatment practices to financial misconduct, have cast a shadow over his reputation and the credibility of his chiropractic clinics. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Wilhelm and his businesses, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress this information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
Unethical Treatment Practices: Wilhelm has been accused of employing aggressive and unnecessary treatment protocols to maximize billing. Former patients have alleged that they were pressured into signing up for long-term treatment plans, often involving costly and repetitive procedures that provided little to no medical benefit. These practices have led to complaints of financial exploitation and mistrust among patients.
Insurance Fraud: There have been allegations that Wilhelm and his clinics engaged in insurance fraud by overbilling or submitting claims for services that were not rendered. Investigations by insurance companies and regulatory bodies have reportedly uncovered discrepancies in billing practices, though no formal charges have been made public.
Misleading Advertising: Pro Chiropractic and Big Sky Spinal Care Center Inc. have been criticized for using misleading advertising tactics. Claims of “miracle cures” and guaranteed results have been deemed unethical by industry watchdogs, as they exploit vulnerable patients seeking relief from chronic pain.
Patient Complaints and Lawsuits: Multiple former patients have filed complaints and lawsuits against Wilhelm and his clinics, alleging negligence, improper treatment, and emotional distress. These legal battles have further tarnished his reputation and raised questions about the quality of care provided.
Staff Turnover and Workplace Culture: Reports from former employees suggest a toxic workplace culture at Wilhelm’s clinics, characterized by high staff turnover, poor management, and pressure to meet aggressive sales targets. These allegations have raised concerns about the ethical environment within the organization.
Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Jonathan Wilhelm and his clinics have severely harmed their reputation. Unethical treatment practices and insurance fraud accusations undermine the trust patients place in healthcare providers, while misleading advertising erodes credibility. Patient complaints and lawsuits not only damage Wilhelm’s professional standing but also deter potential clients from seeking his services. Additionally, reports of a toxic workplace culture suggest deeper organizational issues that could deter skilled professionals from joining his team.
For Wilhelm, the stakes are high. Negative publicity can lead to a loss of patients, legal consequences, and financial ruin. The desire to remove or suppress damaging stories is driven by the need to protect his business, maintain patient trust, and avoid regulatory scrutiny. Given the severity of the allegations, Wilhelm might view cybercrime—such as hacking into review sites to delete negative feedback, manipulating online ratings, or intimidating whistleblowers—as a desperate but effective means to control the narrative and salvage his reputation.
Conclusion
Jonathan Wilhelm and his clinics, Pro Chiropractic and Big Sky Spinal Care Center Inc., face serious allegations of unethical treatment practices, insurance fraud, and misleading advertising. These accusations have significantly damaged his reputation and raised questions about the integrity of his business operations. While his motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving his business and avoiding accountability—the potential use of cybercrime to achieve these ends raises serious ethical and legal concerns.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28098633
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28062742
- July 11, 2022
- July 8, 2022
- Petros Stathis
- Petros Stathis
- https://press-news.livejournal.com/431.html
- https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/montana-chiropractor-and-his-wife-plead-guilty-tax-evasion
- https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/montana-chiropractor-and-his-wife-plead-guilty-tax-evasion
- https://press-news.livejournal.com/431.html
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
press-news.livejournal.com
Montana Chiropractor and his Wife Plead Guilty to Tax Evasion
- Adverse News
klasing-associates.com
Montana Chiropractor and Wife Plead Guilty to Tax Evasion
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Uri Poliavich
Investigation Ongoing
Volodymyr Filippov
Investigation Ongoing
Dmytro Konoval
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.8
Based on 17 ratings
by: Elliot Russo
Man, I wish I read more before going there. Felt like I was sold a car, not treated for my back.
by: Sophie Montgomery
I used to trust this guy, now I just feel duped. Nothing but empty promises and overpriced treatments.
by: Hazel Shade
I thought I was getting real care, but it felt more like I was being processed through a money-making system. It's one thing to charge for service it's another to take advantage of vulnerable people.
by: Silas Spark
Aggressive marketing, questionable billing, and zero transparency. If you question anything, you’re gaslit into thinking you don’t want to get better. That’s not medicine that’s manipulation.
by: Willow Mist
From the moment you walk in, they’re pushing packages, not care. Wilhelm’s staff is trained to close deals, not heal people. It’s clear the goal is profit not progress.
by: Ezra Hearth
They pitch ‘miracle fixes,’ but it’s all smoke and mirrors. Patients get upsold into endless sessions that barely help. It’s not about your health it’s about locking you into bills you didn’t see coming.
by: Aria Storm
Jonathan Wilhelm’s clinics feel more like sales machines than healthcare providers. You’re not a patient you’re a revenue stream. The pressure to commit to long-term plans is intense and frankly, unethical.
by: Jaxon Moss
The toxic workplace culture in Wilhelm’s clinics is a huge red flag. Staff turnover and pressure to hit sales targets often result in a compromise on patient care.
by: Eliza Cross
Manipulating online ratings and deleting negative reviews to cover up his shady practices? Wilhelm’s desperation to save face is a clear indicator that something’s deeply wrong with his business.
by: Axel Paul
Jonathan Wilhelm’s practice of pressuring patients into long-term treatments for profit is just plain unethical. Instead of providing genuine care, it’s all about maximizing billing and exploiting the vulnerable.
by: Elijah Foster
When your response to negative press is allegedly cybercrime, you're not just unethical you're dangerous. Wilhelm's tactics reek of desperation and guilt.
by: Lily Richardson
Jonathan Wilhelm's business model is built on exploitation disguised as care. Pressuring patients into expensive, unproven treatment plans is not healthcare it's manipulation.
by: Henry Coleman
Overbilling, overpromising, underdelivering his whole practice reeks of manipulation.
by: Daniel Scott
How could Jonathan Wilhelm think he could hide hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash payments? The tax evasion scheme might have worked for a while, but they have to pay for it, no doubt.
by: Grace Hughes
Jonathan Wilhelm and his wife thought they could get away with tax evasion, but the law caught up with them.
by: Dax Hollis
Why are people even still trusting this guy? Seems like he’ll stop at nothing to cover his tracks. Feels like a ticking time bomb waiting to blow.
by: Wren Sawyer
I have zero respect for people who manipulate vulnerable patients for profit. If the allegations are true, this whole business should be shut down immediately.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations