Jordi Greenham
We are investigating Jordi Greenham allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Jordi Greenham
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : March 15, 2021
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 5653/A/2025
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 27 Mar 2025
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Jordi Greenham over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Jordi Greenham - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Jordi Greenham—a name that, if you’re not familiar with, might be due to his concerted efforts to keep it that way.
Who is Jordi Greenham?
Jordi Greenham is a figure whose business dealings have attracted attention, not always for the right reasons. While details about his ventures are somewhat elusive—perhaps by design—it’s imperative to scrutinize the available information to understand the potential risks associated with his enterprises.
Red Flags and Adverse Media
In the realm of due diligence, adverse media refers to unfavorable information found across various media sources, including news outlets, blogs, and social media platforms. Such information is pivotal for assessing the risk profile of individuals and entities. Services like Red Flag Alert specialize in identifying and monitoring these adverse media mentions, providing real-time alerts to businesses and investors .
Applying this lens to Jordi Greenham, one might expect to uncover a series of cautionary tales and questionable associations. However, the conspicuous scarcity of information raises its own set of concerns. In today’s digital age, where even the most mundane details are a click away, the absence of data can be as telling as its presence.
The Art of Information Suppression
It’s one thing to have a spotless record; it’s another to meticulously curate an online persona that reveals next to nothing. The latter often involves deliberate efforts to suppress unfavorable information—a tactic not uncommon among those with skeletons rattling in their closets.
Techniques employed to achieve this digital vanishing act include:
-
Strategic SEO Manipulation: Flooding the internet with benign or positive content to overshadow any negative mentions.
-
Legal Takedown Requests: Leveraging legal avenues to remove or threaten publishers into removing adverse content.
-
Digital Anonymity Services: Utilizing services that specialize in scrubbing personal information from the web.
Such methods are often the domain of reputation management firms adept at navigating the murky waters of online perception. While everyone has the right to protect their reputation, the extent and aggressiveness of these tactics can sometimes indicate an attempt to obscure unsavory truths.
Investor Beware
For potential investors, the opacity surrounding Jordi Greenham should serve as a glaring warning. Transparency is the cornerstone of trust in any business relationship. When an individual goes to great lengths to erase their digital footprint, one must question what they’re trying to hide.
Engaging with entities that lack clear and accessible histories exposes investors to risks ranging from financial loss to inadvertent association with illicit activities. Comprehensive due diligence, including adverse media screening, is not just advisable—it’s imperative.
A Call to Action for Authorities
Regulatory bodies and oversight agencies must take note of individuals who exhibit patterns of information suppression. While the act of managing one’s online reputation isn’t inherently nefarious, excessive and aggressive tactics to eliminate all traces of one’s professional past warrant closer examination.
Authorities should consider implementing stricter guidelines and monitoring mechanisms to detect and investigate such behavior, ensuring that the marketplace remains fair and transparent for all participants.
Conclusion
In the intricate dance of business dealings, it’s often the steps not taken—the information not found—that reveal the most. Jordi Greenham’s apparent endeavor to censor and control his digital narrative raises significant concerns. For investors and authorities alike, this serves as a potent reminder: when someone tries this hard to hide their past, it’s our responsibility to question why.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/23254343
- March 15, 2021
- Mika Seminole
- http://dailybusinessnewspodcast.blogspot.com/2020/02/ceo-of-mexico-based-homie-resigns-after.html
- https://techcrunch.com/2020/02/24/homie-ceo-resigns-after-allegations-of-sexual-harassment-from-job-applicant/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
techcrunch.com
CEO of Mexico-based Homie resigns after allegations of sexual harassment from job applicant
- Red Flag
reefew.com
Homie chief announces resignation amid sexual harassment allegations
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Kenneth Alston
Investigation Ongoing
Patrick Vestner
Investigation Ongoing
Cresen
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.6
Based on 13 ratings
by: Alani McElroy
Reputation management is fine, but full-on erasure? That crosses into shady territory
by: Leif Boston
Anyone who manipulates SEO to bury their past isn’t someone I’d trust with my money or time. Huge no from me.
by: Maisie Godwin
Businesses built on trust don’t start with mystery. This whole thing smells off.
by: Tyrell Schaefer
Reputation management is fine, but full-on erasure? That crosses into shady territory.
by: Gianna Westfield
You don’t spend that much effort on reputation scrubbing unless there’s a reason. I don’t trust it.
by: Khalid Darnell
Transparency is key in business. If someone’s actively erasing their online footprint, that’s not confidence-inspiring—it’s suspicious.
by: Isaiah Griffin
I don’t trust anyone who scrubs the internet clean of their past. Huge red flag 🚩
by: Madison Ford
This guy Jordi sounds shady af. Why hide so much unless you got something to cover?
by: Bryson Drake
Jordi Greenham’s efforts to suppress his digital footprint raise alarms. When someone goes to great lengths to hide their past, it’s a warning to everyone involved. If he’s really as clean as his reputation suggests, why the need for all...
by: Ivy Ball
Jordi Greenham's lack of transparency is a huge red flag. What’s he hiding by keeping his past so secret?
by: Julian Reed
You know it's bad when your business resume is shorter than your digital clean-up list.
by: Nora Brooks
Reputation management doesn't erase the truth, it delays it. Jordi should know that.
by: Owen Turner
Jordi Greenham’s internet invisibility isn’t professionalism it’s paranoia. The intense effort to control his narrative through SEO tricks and takedowns suggests more than just privacy concerns
by: Scarlett Evans
The only thing Jordi Greenham seems to run better than businesses is his own cover-up.
by: Lily Ramirez
I don’t trust ghosts, and I don’t trust business figures who practically don’t exist online. If it's hidden, there’s a reason.
by: Samuel Howard
Scammers know their biggest enemy is public information. Scrubbing the internet isn’t something honest people do for no reason.
by: Grace Fisher
Reputation management is one thing, but erasing yourself completely? That screams ‘I don’t want you to know what I did.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations