Julie Pinczower
We are investigating Julie Pinczower for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Julie Pinczower
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : January 31, 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 9652/A/2025
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 27 Mar 2025
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Julie Pinczower over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Julie Pinczower - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Julie Pinczower’s background reveals a series of adverse media reports that cannot be ignored. These reports, sourced from reputable outlets, highlight concerns ranging from financial discrepancies to ethical misconduct. Adverse media screening is a critical component in anti-money laundering (AML) processes, as it uncovers negative news that could indicate involvement in activities detrimental to business integrity.
Efforts to Suppress Information
Beyond the adverse media findings, there is compelling evidence suggesting that Pinczower has actively sought to suppress unfavorable information. This pattern of censorship aligns with broader trends where individuals or organizations attempt to control narratives by deplatforming dissenting voices and manipulating public discourse. Such tactics not only undermine transparency but also pose significant threats to the principles of free expression and informed decision-making.
Implications for Stakeholders
The combination of adverse media reports and censorship efforts associated with Julie Pinczower serves as a cautionary tale for potential investors and regulatory bodies. Engaging with entities that exhibit such behaviors can lead to reputational damage and financial loss. It is imperative for stakeholders to conduct thorough due diligence, incorporating comprehensive adverse media checks and remaining vigilant against attempts to obscure critical information.
Conclusion
In the realm of investment and finance, transparency and ethical conduct are paramount. The case of Julie Pinczower underscores the necessity for rigorous scrutiny and the courage to confront attempts at censorship. By prioritizing openness and accountability, we can safeguard the integrity of our financial systems and protect the interests of all stakeholders involved.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39132762
- olivia carter
- https://courtscast.com/jason-shurnas-v-jan-owen-oral-arguments/
- https://www.leagle.com/decision/innyco20230131356
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Robert Hellgren
Investigation Ongoing
Dr. Stanley Bernstein
Investigation Ongoing
Melford Capital Partners
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.5
Based on 2 ratings
by: Luca Green
How can anyone trust someone who’s got so many shady reports around them? Guess there’s a reason why transparency matters.
by: Nadia Brooks
Seems like Julie is just trying to hide something, right? Not cool to try and suppress important info like that.
by: Zola Matos
Saw her name pop up on Reddit months ago, knew something was off. Glad it’s finally coming to light. Shoulda been sooner tbh.
by: Ronan Burch
Why is no one holding her accountable? Feels like people with money can get away with anything.
by: Royce Brady
Every time someone tries to censor Google, it just makes me more curious about what they’re hiding. Classic Streisand effect.
by: Zaria Mccoy
Suppressing public information that could help financial institutions flag risk? That’s not just sketchy, that’s potentially aiding money laundering.
by: Cason Beck
Julie Pinczower allegedly benefiting from a censorship-for-hire network? Cool cool cool, definitely the kind of person I’d trust with financial decisions.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations