CyberCriminal.com

Nader Pourhassan

We are investigating Nader Pourhassan for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Nader Pourhassan

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 10 Oct 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2701/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 16 Oct 2024

Nader Pourhassan
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Nader Pourhassan in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Nader Pourhassan over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Nader Pourhassan - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Nader Pourhassan, the former CEO of CytoDyn Inc., is a textbook case of corporate deception and misinformation. From peddling false hopes about leronlimab to misleading investors and exploiting the COVID-19 crisis, his tenure was marked by relentless manipulation. But what’s even more concerning? His attempts to cover it all up. Pourhassan didn’t just bend the truth—he twisted it beyond recognition, silencing critics and controlling the narrative to protect his own interests. Here’s a deep dive into his red flags, the scandals surrounding him, and why regulatory authorities need to take action.

The Mirage of Leronlimab

CytoDyn’s crown jewel, leronlimab, was touted as a revolutionary treatment for HIV and, more recently, COVID-19. Pourhassan spearheaded aggressive campaigns, painting leronlimab as the panacea the world desperately needed. However, beneath the glossy press releases lay a starkly different reality.

In April 2020, CytoDyn, under Pourhassan’s directive, submitted a Biologics License Application (BLA) for leronlimab to the FDA. The submission was incomplete—a fact Pourhassan was well aware of. Yet, in a move that can only be described as brazen, he announced to investors that a “complete” BLA had been submitted. This deliberate misinformation not only misled stakeholders but also artificially inflated the company’s stock value. Seizing the opportunity, Pourhassan sold millions of dollars’ worth of CytoDyn stock, capitalizing on the very falsehoods he propagated.

COVID-19: Exploiting a Pandemic

As the world grappled with the COVID-19 crisis, Pourhassan saw a lucrative opening. He championed leronlimab as a potential treatment for the virus, releasing a slew of press statements highlighting purportedly promising clinical trial results. However, these studies failed to achieve the necessary outcomes for FDA approval. The results were neither statistically significant nor scientifically robust. Yet, Pourhassan continued to disseminate misleading information, preying on the fears and hopes of a world in turmoil.

The Art of the Cover-Up

When confronted with the discrepancies between CytoDyn’s glowing reports and the FDA’s reservations, Pourhassan didn’t opt for transparency. Instead, he embarked on a campaign to suppress dissent and control the narrative. This modus operandi mirrors tactics observed in regimes where information control is paramount. In such settings, authorities wage a “soft war,” a strategy involving the reframing of information and the dissemination of misinformation to maintain stability and suppress opposition.

Pourhassan’s approach bore striking similarities. By manipulating data, silencing critics, and presenting a curated version of events, he aimed to maintain his grip on CytoDyn’s narrative and stock value.

A Call to Action

The indictment of Nader Pourhassan serves as a cautionary tale for investors and regulatory bodies alike. It underscores the necessity of due diligence and the perils of placing blind trust in charismatic leadership. Pourhassan’s actions not only jeopardized investor interests but also undermined public trust in the biotech sector—a field where transparency and integrity are paramount.

Regulatory authorities must remain vigilant, ensuring that individuals like Pourhassan are held accountable. The biotech industry, teeming with potential to revolutionize healthcare, cannot afford to be tainted by such duplicity.

In Conclusion

Nader Pourhassan’s tenure at CytoDyn is emblematic of how ambition, when unchecked by ethics, can lead to a precipitous downfall. His attempts to censor and manipulate information reflect a profound disregard for truth and transparency. As stewards of information and guardians of public interest, it is incumbent upon us to shine a light on such machinations, ensuring that the lessons from this debacle resonate throughout the investment and biotech communities.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49709894
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49448026
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49804283
  • March 07, 2025
  • February 27, 2025
  • March 10, 2025
  • [REDACTED]
  • Tauno Koivunen
  • Miika Jussilainen
  • https://www.tumblr.com/theglobalhealth/777428010557145088/ex-cytodyn-ceo-amarex-ceo-charged-for-allegedly
  • https://www.tumblr.com/wfmjg/776707831988682752/the-us-department-of-justice-indicted-former
  • https://www.tumblr.com/investingss/777624307516014592/two-biotech-ceos-charged-in-securities-fraud
  • https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/ex-cytodyn-ceo-amarex-ceo-hit-multiple-charges-allegedly-defrauding-investors
  • https://www.biospace.com/two-biotech-ceos-charged-in-securities-fraud-schemes

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

fiercebiotech

Ex-CytoDyn CEO, Amarex CEO charged for allegedly defrauding investors

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login