CyberCriminal.com

Nathan Barns

We are investigating Nathan Barns for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Nathan Barns

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : July 09, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 4561/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Mar 2025

Nathan Barns
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Nathan Barns in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Nathan Barns over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Nathan Barns - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Nathan Barns—remember the name, because if you’re an investor, regulator, or just someone who values financial integrity, you’ll want to steer clear. Barns has left a trail of lawsuits, allegations of fraud, and questionable business dealings in his wake. Even more concerning? He’s been actively trying to bury the evidence, silencing critics and scrubbing adverse media wherever possible. But no amount of censorship can erase the red flags that demand attention. Let’s break down the legal battles, financial misconduct, and shady tactics that make Nathan Barns a name worth remembering—for all the wrong reasons.

A Trail of Litigation

Barns’s legal entanglements are both numerous and telling. In October 2022, Barns, along with Susannah and Darren Kilpatrick, filed a lawsuit alleging breach of contract, fraud and fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and conversion. They also sought judicial dissolution of a company and access to its books and records for accounting purposes.

Further complicating Barns’s legal landscape is a request for judgment filed on January 24, 2025, involving a dispute between Barns, the Kilpatricks, and Hardbody Energy LLC. While the specifics of this case are not fully detailed, the recurring theme of financial disputes and legal action is hard to ignore.

Allegations of Financial Misconduct

Beyond the courtroom, Barns’s professional conduct has come under scrutiny. A report titled “Nathan D. Barns- Did He, CFA, AAMS at Edward Jones Commit Fraud?” raises concerns about his integrity in the financial industry. The article underscores the importance of trust in financial services and suggests that Barns’s actions may have breached this fundamental principle.

Attempts to Suppress Negative Publicity

In an era where information is readily accessible, Barns appears to be employing tactics aimed at censoring unfavorable coverage. Reports indicate that he has attempted to suppress negative media, possibly through legal threats or other means. Such actions not only raise ethical questions but also suggest a desire to obscure the truth from potential investors and the public.

The Sarcastic Elephant in the Room

It’s almost commendable how Barns manages to juggle multiple lawsuits while attempting to maintain a veneer of respectability. One might think that a person facing such serious allegations would prioritize transparency and accountability. Instead, Barns seems to believe that silencing critics and burying unfavorable news will somehow restore his tarnished reputation. Spoiler alert: it won’t.

Conclusion and Call to Action

The pattern of legal disputes, allegations of financial misconduct, and efforts to suppress negative media paint a concerning picture of Nathan Barns. Potential investors should exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough due diligence before engaging in any financial dealings with him. Moreover, regulatory authorities must take a closer look at Barns’s activities to ensure that the public is protected from potential malfeasance.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42924579
  • July 09, 2024
  • hansen llc
  • https://www.voanews.com/a/fidel-castro-death-family-torn/3612431.html
  • https://dockets.justia.com/docket/kansas/ksdce/2:2022cv02433/144079

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

justia dockets

Barns et al v. Payne et al

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login