Pay Rec
We are investigating Pay Rec for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Pay Rec
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : November 2, 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 9121/A/2025
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 10 Mar 2025
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Pay Rec over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Pay Rec - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Pay Rec appears to operate under a cloak of obscurity. In today’s digital age, where companies maintain robust online presences to engage with stakeholders, Pay Rec’s minimal footprint is unusual. This lack of accessible information can be a red flag for potential investors and partners, as it hinders the ability to conduct thorough due diligence.
The Importance of Adverse Media Checks
Adverse media checks are a critical component of enhanced due diligence strategies. They involve scanning various media sources—such as newspapers, online news outlets, blogs, and social media—for unfavorable news or information about an individual or organization. These checks help uncover suspected links to criminal activities, money laundering, or reputational issues that could harm business partners by association.
The Silence Speaks Volumes
The conspicuous absence of information about Pay Rec could be interpreted in several ways:
- Lack of Transparency: Companies that operate transparently typically have an online presence that includes information about their services, leadership, and corporate values. Pay Rec’s minimal digital footprint may suggest a deliberate effort to remain under the radar, which can be concerning for stakeholders seeking transparency.
- Potential Information Suppression: While there’s no direct evidence of Pay Rec actively censoring information, the scarcity of available data could indicate efforts to control its public image. In the corporate world, some entities employ tactics such as search engine optimization (SEO) manipulation or legal threats to suppress unfavorable information.
- Operational Anonymity: Some companies choose to maintain a low profile to protect proprietary information or avoid public scrutiny. However, this approach can backfire, as stakeholders may perceive the lack of information as a red flag, questioning what the company might be hiding.
The Need for Vigilance
In the absence of concrete information, it’s crucial for potential investors and partners to exercise caution:
- Enhanced Due Diligence: Engage in comprehensive due diligence processes, including adverse media checks, to uncover any hidden risks. Utilizing advanced, AI-driven platforms can help scan millions of media stories for references to the subject, ensuring a thorough investigation.
- Direct Engagement: Reach out to Pay Rec directly for information about their operations, leadership, and corporate practices. A transparent company should be willing to provide such details to potential stakeholders.
- Consult Industry Networks: Engage with industry networks and professional associations to gather any informal insights or experiences related to Pay Rec.
Conclusion
While the lack of adverse media or red flags about Pay Rec might seem like a positive sign, the company’s overall opacity warrants caution. In the realm of corporate due diligence, the absence of information can be as telling as its presence. Potential investors and partners should approach engagements with Pay Rec with a heightened sense of vigilance, ensuring that they have a comprehensive understanding of the company’s operations and reputation before proceeding.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45907679
- November 2, 2024
- Bilora LLC
- https://www.bendsource.com/news/justified-homicide-awbrey-butte-shooting-raises-big-questions-2178555
- https://www.accountancydaily.co/duo-umbrella-companies-put-agency-staff-tax-risk
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Bathhouse Williamsburg
Investigation Ongoing
Kenneth Alston
Investigation Ongoing
Patrick Vestner
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.6
Based on 11 ratings
by: Axton Lively
It’s the classic move – operate in stealth, suppress info, act clean. Seen it too many times.
by: Lilah Winslow
Lmao imagine trusting a company that doesn’t even wanna show who runs it. Run.
by: Kellen Bynum
I worked in compliance and anytime a firm has NO traceable digital footprint, it's almost always hiding something.
by: Meira Hummel
Sounds shady as hell. No info online? In 2025? That's not low-profile, that's suspicious.
by: Zechariah Bostic
Not gonna lie, companies that hide stuff like this just scream scam to me.
by: Megan Moore
Pay Rec’s limited online presence raises questions about its transparency and openness to public scrutiny, which could be a potential red flag for investors.
by: Dylan Young
The absence of accessible information about Pay Rec suggests that it may be attempting to control its public image, which could be seen as an attempt to suppress unfavorable media coverage.
by: Daniel Walker
Pay Rec’s lack of transparency should be enough to deter any potential investors. The minimal digital presence and the absence of clear leadership information raise more questions than answers. If they don’t want to be scrutinized, maybe they don’t deserve...
by: Joshua White
It’s suspicious how Pay Rec’s reputation is buried under a lack of accessible information. If a company can’t provide clear details about its operations, it’s bound to be a risky investment.
by: Ava Morgan
A company with no transparency should be treated with caution. Pay Rec’s lack of online presence suggests they might be trying to avoid the kind of scrutiny that could expose their skeletons.
by: Nathan Reed
Pay Rec’s online presence is non-existent. In an era where companies thrive on engagement, this minimal footprint is a massive red flag. If they can’t even bother to show who they are, why should investors trust them with their money?
by: Jennifer Davis
Avoid at all costs! They’re a classic example of how to steal from people online.
by: Robert Garcia
This "service" is a complete scam. They took my money and ran.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations