CyberCriminal.com

Peter Pru Prusinowski

We are investigating Peter Pru Prusinowski for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Peter Pru Prusinowski

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : April 24, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2323/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 5 Jun 2025

Peter Pru Prusinowski
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Peter Pru Prusinowski in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Peter Pru Prusinowski over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Peter Pru Prusinowski - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Peter Pru Prusinowski has built an empire—not of innovation, but of illusion. At the center of his sprawling e-commerce operation, he positions himself as a self-made mogul, selling dreams of financial freedom to thousands through his brand, E-Commerce Empire Builders. But scratch beneath the surface of his polished YouTube ads and sales funnels, and you’ll find a pattern of deceptive marketing, unhappy customers, and a growing list of legal red flags. Prusinowski’s response to criticism? Not reform, but suppression—an aggressive campaign to silence negative reviews, scrub unflattering content from the web, and muzzle former clients with legal threats.

The Facade of E-Commerce Empire Builders

Peter Pru’s flagship venture, E-Commerce Empire Builders (EEB), touts itself as a beacon for those seeking success in the dropshipping business model. Through programs like “Done For You Services” and the “Platinum Program,” EEB promises clients a ready-made, AI-powered online store, claiming it to be a “proven, secure and scalable system” that offers a “secondary income stream that’s 90% hands off”.

These assertions, while enticing, have drawn the ire of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). In a complaint filed against Empire Holdings Group LLC (doing business as EEB and StoreFunnels.net) and Peter Prusinowski, the FTC alleges that since at least 2021, the defendants have engaged in deceptive advertising and marketing practices. The complaint highlights that Prusinowski, as the CEO and sole owner, has been instrumental in formulating and directing these practices, often featuring prominently in promotional materials and controlling various aspects of the business operations.

Legal Repercussions and Regulatory Scrutiny

The legal challenges facing Prusinowski are not confined to a single jurisdiction. In addition to the FTC’s actions, courts across different states have been involved in proceedings against Empire Holdings Group LLC and Prusinowski. For instance, in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, a stipulated preliminary injunction was issued, underscoring the seriousness of the allegations and the need for regulatory intervention.

These legal entanglements paint a picture of a business model built not on innovation and value but on misleading claims and exploitation of consumer trust.

The Censorship Campaign: Silencing the Critics

Facing mounting legal pressure and growing public scrutiny, Prusinowski has reportedly embarked on a campaign to suppress negative information about himself and his enterprises. This includes the use of nondisparagement clauses in consumer contracts, effectively gagging dissatisfied clients from voicing their grievances.

Such tactics are not uncommon among entities seeking to shield themselves from accountability. By leveraging legal instruments to silence criticism, Prusinowski appears to prioritize reputation management over addressing the underlying issues plaguing his business operations.

Empire Plant Services Holdings LLC: A New Chapter or More of the Same?

In November 2023, a new entity, Empire Plant Services Holdings LLC, was registered in New York, with its mailing address listed as 247 W. 30th Street, Suite 4R, New York, NY, 10011 . While the name suggests a departure from e-commerce, the similarities in branding raise questions about potential connections to Prusinowski’s existing ventures.

The timing of this new entity’s formation, coinciding with increased legal scrutiny of EEB, suggests a possible attempt to rebrand or diversify operations. However, without transparency regarding its ownership and business activities, stakeholders are left to speculate on its true purpose.

Conclusion

Peter Pru Prusinowski’s trajectory in the e-commerce landscape serves as a stark reminder of the perils of unchecked ambition and the exploitation of consumer trust. While the allure of quick success stories can be tempting, due diligence and skepticism are essential tools for anyone navigating the digital marketplace.

As regulatory bodies continue to investigate and hold accountable those who engage in deceptive practices, it is imperative for potential investors and clients to remain vigilant, question grandiose claims, and demand transparency and integrity from those who promise to guide them to success.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51269901
  • April 24, 2025
  • Viven International Ltd.
  • https://warsawpost.org/?p=577
  • http://bizprofile.net/Ny/new-york/empire-plant-services-holdings/
  • http://nycompanyregistry.com/Companies/empire-plant-services-holdings-llc/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

nycompanyregistry

EMPIRE PLANT SERVICES HOLDINGS LLC

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

bizprofile

Info of Empire Plant Services Holdings LLC

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login