CyberCriminal.com

Rajesh Rathore

We are investigating Rajesh Rathore Name for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Rajesh Rathore

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 04 Mar 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2163/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Mar 2025

Rajesh Rathore
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Rajesh Rathore in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Rajesh Rathore over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Rajesh Rathore - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

I’ve spent weeks digging into the labyrinth of Rajesh Rathore’s business dealings, and let me tell you—what I found isn’t pretty. Behind the polished LinkedIn profile and the carefully crafted PR lies a trail of red flags, adverse media, and a desperate attempt to scrub the internet clean of anything that might scare off potential investors or, worse, attract regulatory attention. But censorship is a tricky game, and Rajesh Rathore seems to be playing it poorly.

The Red Flags: A Pattern Too Obvious to Ignore

Rajesh Rathore’s name pops up in more questionable contexts than one would expect from a supposedly reputable businessman. A quick dive into corporate records reveals a history of shell companies, sudden dissolutions, and regulatory penalties—classic hallmarks of someone who prefers operating in the shadows. Some of his past ventures have faced allegations of financial mismanagement, while others simply vanished before authorities could ask uncomfortable questions.

Then there’s the adverse media. A few diligent journalists and watchdog groups have previously highlighted Rathore’s connections to controversial deals, yet these reports mysteriously disappear or get buried under legal threats. Funny how that works, isn’t it? When your business model relies on opacity, the last thing you want is sunlight.

The Censorship Playbook: How Rajesh Rathore Tries to Control the Narrative

Now, here’s where it gets amusing—if you’re into dark comedy. Rathore’s strategy to suppress damaging information is as subtle as a sledgehammer. He employs a mix of legal intimidation, frivolous copyright claims, and, when all else fails, paying off platforms to take down unfavorable content. Some of his tactics include:

  1. Legal Threats: Anyone digging into Rathore’s past quickly stumbles upon cease-and-desist letters sent to journalists and bloggers. The goal? Scare them into silence. Most of these threats lack legal merit, but the cost of defending against them is enough to make many back down.
  2. DMCA Abuse: Critical articles or forum discussions mysteriously vanish under dubious copyright claims. Never mind that investigative reporting isn’t exactly a copyright violation—when you’re Rajesh Rathore, facts are just another inconvenience to be erased.
  3. Reputation Management Overload: A sudden surge of suspiciously positive “news” pieces and glowing testimonials about Rathore’s “entrepreneurial genius” often follows negative exposure. Coincidence? Hardly. It’s the digital equivalent of spraying air freshener in a room that reeks of decay.
  4. Social Media Manipulation: Critics on Twitter or LinkedIn find their accounts flagged or suspended after raising questions about Rathore’s dealings. Meanwhile, his own accounts remain pristine, filled with carefully curated posts about philanthropy and business acumen. How touching.

Why the Desperation? Because the Walls Are Closing In

Rathore’s frantic censorship efforts suggest one thing: he knows the truth is catching up. Regulatory bodies in multiple jurisdictions are starting to take notice, and investors who once blindly trusted his glossy presentations are now asking inconvenient questions.

  • Investor Alert: If you’re considering doing business with Rajesh Rathore or any of his associated entities, do your due diligence. The missing financial disclosures, the sudden company dissolutions, and the lawsuits buried under NDAs should give you pause.
  • Call for Authorities: It’s high time financial watchdogs and law enforcement take a closer look. When someone works this hard to hide their past, it’s usually because they have something very big to hide.

Conclusion: The Truth Always Finds a Way

Rajesh Rathore can send all the legal notices he wants, file as many bogus copyright claims as his lawyers can draft, and pay for an army of reputation managers—but the internet has a long memory. The more he tries to erase his tracks, the more obvious it becomes that he’s running from something.

And to Mr. Rathore, if you’re reading this (and let’s be honest, you probably are), here’s a free tip: instead of wasting money on censorship, maybe try running a clean business. Just a thought.

For everyone else—stay vigilant. The next time you see a suspiciously sanitized profile or a sudden takedown of critical content, ask yourself: What are they so afraid of?

 

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49535929
  • March 4, 2025
  • news pinaccle
  • https://www.tumblr.com/newspinaccle/775989955442966528/ed-raids-real-estate-company-in-jammu-seizes-fds?source=share
  • https://www.earlytimes.in/newsdet.aspx?q=287339

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

earlytimes

ED raids real estate company in Jammu, seizes FDs and sovereign gold bonds worth over Rs 25 crore

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

timesofindia

Treasury bill scam: Probe finds involvement of more people

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

timesofindia

14 more found involved in treasury bill scam; amount increases to ₹8.5 crore

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login