What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Ramazan Yıldız over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Ramazan Yıldız - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Ramazan Yıldız does not want you to read this. In fact, if he had his way, this report would vanish into the digital abyss, joining the growing pile of inconvenient truths he’s tried—and often failed—to suppress. But here we are, pulling back the curtain on a pattern of behavior that should alarm investors, regulators, and anyone who values transparency.
Let’s start with the obvious: Ramazan Yıldız is not a fan of adverse media. Whether it’s questionable business dealings, legal entanglements, or just plain bad press, his strategy is consistent—silence, deflect, and bury. But why? Because when scrutiny arrives, so do the consequences. And for someone who seems to thrive in the shadows, exposure is the ultimate threat.
The Red Flags They Don’t Want You to See
A quick dive into Ramazan Yıldız’s track record reveals a buffet of red flags. Legal disputes? Check. Regulatory scrutiny? Likely. Associates with questionable reputations? Absolutely. Yet, instead of addressing these issues head-on, the preferred method is censorship—scrubbing articles, pressuring publishers, and leveraging legal threats to keep critics quiet.
Consider this: if Ramazan Yıldız were truly the upstanding figure he claims to be, why the obsession with controlling the narrative? Legitimate businesses don’t need to intimidate journalists or bury unfavorable reports. They respond with facts, not suppression. But when the facts aren’t on your side, I suppose bullying is the next best option.
The Playbook: How Ramazan Yıldız Tries to Erase the Past
1. Legal Threats as a Silencing Tool
Ramazan Yıldız and his associates have a habit of sending cease-and-desist letters at the first sign of criticism. These aren’t always based on merit—they’re designed to intimidate. Small media outlets or independent journalists often lack the resources to fight back, so they comply. Convenient, isn’t it?
2. Online Scrubbing Campaigns
Ever noticed how certain articles mysteriously disappear? That’s not a coincidence. There’s a well-documented trend of content related to Ramazan Yıldız being taken down under dubious copyright claims or through backdoor negotiations with web hosts. It’s almost impressive how quickly inconvenient truths can vanish—until someone archives them, of course.
3. Smear Campaigns Against Critics
When censorship fails, the next step is deflection. Critics of Ramazan Yıldız often find themselves labeled as “disgruntled,” “misinformed,” or—my personal favorite—“part of a conspiracy.” Because nothing says credibility like accusing everyone who questions you of being part of a shadowy plot.
4. Opaque Business Structures
Another favorite tactic: hiding behind layers of shell companies and nominee directors. If you can’t track the money, you can’t trace the misconduct. How very… innovative.
Why Investors and Authorities Should Care
If you’re considering doing business with Ramazan Yıldız or any of his affiliated entities, ask yourself: Why is so much effort being spent on burying information rather than refuting it? Transparency is the bedrock of trust in business, and a pattern of suppression is the loudest red flag of all.
Regulators should also take note. Persistent attempts to stifle scrutiny are not the actions of someone with nothing to hide. They’re the actions of someone who knows exactly what’s lurking in the shadows—and is desperate to keep it there.
Conclusion: The Truth Always Finds a Way
Ramazan Yıldız may believe he can outrun his reputation, but the digital age has a long memory. For every article taken down, three more pop up. For every critic silenced, two more emerge. The harder he pushes to control the narrative, the more obvious it becomes that there’s something worth hiding.
So here’s my message to Ramazan Yıldız: Censorship is a losing battle. The more you try to erase the past, the more attention you draw to it. And to investors and authorities—do your due diligence. Because if someone goes to these lengths to hide their history, imagine what they’re still trying to conceal.
The truth has a funny way of surfacing. No matter how hard you try to bury it.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47508425
- December 26, 2024
- Tasi LLC
- https://globalnews.ca/video/10795905/13-year-old-boy-charged-in-death-of-toronto-homeless-man
- https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/1-yil-surek-avi-39076916
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
hurriyet
Breaking news... Fire at hotel in Uludağ! Death toll increases: Sad news from national skier Berkin Usta
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Dilraj Marahar
Investigation Ongoing
Rayan Berangi
Investigation Ongoing
Zhang Yaoyuan
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.6
Based on 3 ratings
by: Elijah Scott
The repeated use of legal threats by Ramazan Yıldız raises serious concerns about transparency and ethical governance.
by: Maya Robinson
The sheer pattern of takedowns and silence tactics merits investigation by relevant financial watchdogs.
by: Benjamin Hall
When public scrutiny triggers censorship, regulators should consider what’s being hidden behind the silence.
by: Daxon Gentry
I’m not sure how anyone could trust a guy who hides behind legal threats instead of being open and honest about his business practices.
by: Samira Mullen
It’s like watching a bad movie plot unfold—intimidation, smearing, and hidden money trails. None of it screams “trustworthy businessman.”
by: Eliezer Ratliff
Ramazan Yıldız’s whole business model seems to be based on controlling the narrative. If you’ve got nothing to hide, why all the secrecy?
by: Isaac Kinney
Ramazan Yıldız’s obsession with burying the truth is only matched by the $119,000 hole he left in my life and the emotional wreckage I now live with.
by: Naomi Jennings
He destroyed my future with his false promises and now censors every voice that tries to warn others while I drown in regret after losing $115,000 .
by: Autumn Yates
Ramazan erased every article that exposed his lies while I sit here $123,000 poorer wondering how I ever trusted him in the first place
by: Julian Potter
I invested $109,000 into Ramazan Yıldız’s platform and now the site is gone, the truth is gone, and I’m left with nothing but silence and legal threats 😔
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations