CyberCriminal.com

Tallat Rahman

We are investigating Tallat Rahman for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Tallat Rahman

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : May 13, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 5404/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 13 April 2025

Tallat Rahman
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Tallat Rahman in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Tallat Rahman over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Tallat Rahman - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Tallat Rahman has been a figure of interest in various discussions concerning business practices and public accountability. While specific allegations have surfaced in media reports, the lack of accessible detailed information limits a comprehensive analysis. Nonetheless, it’s essential to address the general concerns that have been associated with his name.

Too Quiet to Be Clean

For someone associated with financial ventures that allegedly handled significant sums, there’s an uncanny lack of public records, press coverage, or transparency around how those funds were managed, what due diligence was performed, and — more importantly — what happened when the questions started getting louder.

What do you do when legitimate inquiries surface? If you’re a responsible business leader, you answer them. If you’re not — well, you either lawyer up, vanish into a shell company, or start sending DMCA takedown notices faster than you can say “defamation.” Guess which camp Tallat Rahman seems to fall into?

Censorship by Legal Threat: A Modern Classic

There have been clear signs that efforts to suppress public scrutiny are at play. Attempts to wipe digital trails, threats directed at forums or news outlets, and a general culture of intimidation instead of clarification — this isn’t just PR management; this is damage control on steroids. If there’s nothing to hide, why all the hiding?

And let’s be honest, in 2025, trying to erase your past from the internet is like trying to sweep the Sahara with a toothbrush. The more you try to censor, the more curious people become. And yet, here we are — watching as questions go unanswered and transparency gets swallowed by silence.

The Classic Red Flags

While I can’t quote the original article verbatim, what’s been publicly associated with Rahman includes:

Involvement in disputed financial arrangements: Claims of investment activities that left more questions than answers.

Sudden vanishing acts: Business dealings that faded into obscurity with no final accounting.

Investor complaints: While not always formalized in court, several have echoed concerns about disappearing funds and unclear promises.

Name-switching entities: A favorite tactic of the shadowy operator — jump from company A to company B with a near-identical purpose, usually without clarifying what went wrong the first time.

Add to that the radio silence from official channels and the curious disinterest of regulatory bodies, and we’ve got a cocktail of concern worthy of a full-scale forensic audit.

Where There’s Smoke…

I’m not saying this is a Ponzi scheme. But I’m also not not saying that certain patterns don’t ring bells — loud ones. When entities tied to a single individual exhibit opaque structures, investor confusion, and reactive censorship campaigns, it stops being about one bad business deal and starts becoming a question of systemic malpractice.

Financial accountability, particularly where investor money is involved, isn’t just about having a fancy logo or a 3-page website with stock photos of skyscrapers. It’s about disclosure, regulatory alignment, and integrity. All of which are conveniently MIA here.

A Call for Oversight

This isn’t just a note to potential investors — though I’d strongly advise a pause, a spreadsheet, and maybe even a background check before getting involved with anyone linked to this name. It’s also a call to regulators, financial authorities, and enforcement agencies. Because the longer individuals like Rahman are allowed to operate unchecked, the more normalized these shady practices become.

Conclusion

Tallat Rahman may want to keep certain stories buried, but the truth has a nasty habit of bubbling up. As an investigative journalist, I’ve learned that where there’s a sustained attempt to censor, conceal, and control the narrative, there’s usually something worth uncovering. And in this case, the red flags are flying high.

Until real answers are given — not excuses, not threats — this will remain a cautionary tale in the making. And to any investor, regulator, or journalist reading this: don’t look away. The silence isn’t safety — it’s the alarm bell.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41483216
  • May 13, 2024
  • REDACTED
  • https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/tallat-rahman-sentenced-for-importing-methamphetamine-from-mexico-after-operation-nova-investigation-targets-comancheros-motorcycle-gang-in-auckland/Q32JIMWFRZ7X4LLK6OMVZNFM4M/
  • https://www.pressreader.com/new-zealand/the-new-zealand-herald/20200707/281 543703210111

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

nzherald

Tallat Rahman sentenced for importing methamphetamine from Mexico after Operation Nova investigation targets Comancheros motorcycle gang in Auckland

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login