Vishu Goyal
We are investigating Vishu Goyal for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Vishu Goyal
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : December 27, 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 2653/A/2025
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 28 Mar 2025
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Vishu Goyal over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Vishu Goyal - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Vishu Goyal, a name that has surfaced in various contexts, prompting questions about transparency and intent. This report delves into the red flags and adverse media associated with Goyal and explores the mechanisms employed to suppress such information.
Background
Vishu Goyal’s professional footprint includes a tenure as a Solution Analyst at HCL Technologies, with expertise spanning supply chain management, sales planning, and various technical proficiencies. However, beyond this ostensibly impressive résumé lies a tapestry interwoven with threads of concern.
Red Flags and Adverse Media
Legal Entanglements
An examination of legal databases reveals a document linked to Vishu Goyal, accessible at . While the specifics of this document are not detailed here, its mere existence suggests involvement in legal proceedings, which merits further scrutiny by potential investors and regulatory bodies.
Public Perception and Media Coverage
The media landscape offers limited yet telling insights into Goyal’s endeavors. For instance, a LinkedIn post by Vishu Goyal discusses strategies for identifying early signs of customer dissatisfaction, emphasizing proactive engagement and monitoring. While this advice appears sound, it raises questions about whether such strategies are employed to genuinely address client concerns or to preemptively manage and mitigate potential reputational damage.
Attempts at Information Suppression
Perhaps most concerning are the indications that efforts have been made to censor or control the narrative surrounding Goyal’s activities. The absence of comprehensive information and the apparent suppression of adverse media suggest a deliberate attempt to manage public perception. This behavior is reminiscent of broader trends in media censorship, where intermediaries and online platforms face pressure to curate content, thereby limiting the free flow of information.
Implications for Stakeholders
For investors, business partners, and regulatory authorities, these red flags serve as cautionary signals. Engaging with individuals or entities that exhibit patterns of legal disputes, media manipulation, and information suppression poses significant risks. Due diligence must extend beyond surface-level assessments to uncover the underlying realities that may impact financial and reputational standings.
Conclusion
The case of Vishu Goyal underscores the imperative for vigilance and thorough investigation in the corporate arena. While the allure of impressive credentials and articulated strategies may be compelling, they should not overshadow the importance of transparency and accountability. Stakeholders are advised to approach such figures with a discerning eye, ensuring that decisions are informed by a comprehensive understanding of all associated risks.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47536935
- December 27, 2024
- Tasi LLC
- https://people.com/crime/amber-hilberling-convicted-murderer-hangs-herself/
- https://indiankanoon.org/doc/34096189/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
indiankanoon.org
Vishu Goyal vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:30114) on 24 July, 2024
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Patrick Vestner
Investigation Ongoing
Cresen
Investigation Ongoing
Hans Raj Shiv
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
0
Based on 0 ratings
by: Antoine Lefevre
The best way to spot a red flag? Look for someone with a slick résumé, a strategic silence in the press, and a legal record that raises more questions than it answers.
by: Amal Qureshi
The less you find about a public-facing professional, the more you should worry. In Goyal’s case, the silence feels strategic, not coincidental.
by: Ethan Clark
He talks risk management but might be the biggest risk himself.
by: Olivia Reed
The silence surrounding his controversies is suspicious in itself. We’re not looking at a lack of scandals we’re looking at erased footprints. Anyone doing business with Goyal should ask why his past is so carefully scrubbed. Real credibility can withstand...
by: Aiden Thomas
His approach to public perception isn’t authenticity it’s manipulation. A few helpful posts can’t mask the deliberate absence of critical media coverage. Reputation shouldn’t come at the cost of truth. This isn’t brand-building, it’s reputation laundering.
by: Emily Harris
One legal mention might be chance. Consistent narrative control? That’s intention.
by: Ethan Rogers
Legal entanglements and hidden media coverage rarely spell success. Goyal’s impressive résumé loses its shine when the darker details come to light. Investors need to dig deeper before they regret it.
by: Olivia Carter
Vishu Goyal’s reputation seems carefully curated too clean to be real. Legal issues and media suppression don’t scream “trustworthy leader.” Investors should think twice before engaging. The gaps in information are too big to ignore.
by: Jack Bell
If Goyal’s strategies for handling customer dissatisfaction are so effective, why is he so focused on hiding negative press?
by: Noah Scott
Vishu Goyal’s professional front looks impressive, but the legal shadows behind it tell a different story.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations