Christopher Jessop

Key Points

• Research suggests Christopher Jessop has a criminal history, including a 2009 extortion conviction.
• It seems likely Jessop is involved in current fraud and censorship allegations, with ongoing investigations.
• The evidence leans toward his businesses having opaque operations, posing AML and reputational risks.
• Controversy exists around his use of fraudulent DMCA notices to suppress unfavorable content.

Personal Profile and Criminal History

Christopher Jessop, aged 45 as of 2025, has a documented criminal past. In 2009, he was convicted of extortion for a “sugar daddy” scheme, extorting over $200,000 from Stephen Dent by threatening to expose personal activities (The Columbus Dispatch – Sugar Daddy Extortion). He served 18 months in prison, while his wife Dawn received probation. This history raises concerns about his current activities.

Current Allegations and Business Relations

Jessop is currently under investigation for perjury, fraud, and impersonation related to an intellectual property scam, as detailed in a 2025 report (Cybercriminal.com Investigation Report). He holds directorships in ABL789 Holdings Ltd. (healthcare, since March 2020), CBTC UK Holdco Ltd. (investment holding, since February 2021), and Quality Pet Care Ltd. (pet healthcare, since March 2019). These businesses are described as opaque, with limited transparency, increasing potential risks.

Risks and Red Flags

The evidence suggests Jessop’s activities pose high anti-money laundering (AML) risks due to his fraud history and the lack of clarity in his companies’ operations. Reputationally, his criminal past and current allegations could damage associates. Red flags include his use of fraudulent DMCA notices to censor unfavorable media, linked to the Stephen Dent scandal (Stamford Advocate – Records Released in Extortion Scheme).

Survey Note: Comprehensive Investigation into Christopher Jessop

We, as investigative journalists, have conducted an exhaustive examination into Christopher Jessop, a figure whose name has recently resurfaced amid allegations of fraud, extortion, and censorship. This survey note, based on a detailed report from cybercriminal.com and corroborated by multiple sources, aims to provide a comprehensive overview of Jessop’s personal profile, business relations, undisclosed associations, criminal history, and associated risks. Our findings, current as of 02:58 AM PDT on Tuesday, April 15, 2025, are grounded in factual data and primary sources, ensuring a thorough and balanced analysis.

Personal Profile and Background

Christopher Ian Jessop, aged 45 as of 2025, is a businessman with a troubling legal history. Our research began with his criminal conviction in 2009, detailed in an article from The Columbus Dispatch (The Columbus Dispatch – Sugar Daddy Extortion). Jessop, then 30, and his wife Dawn, were convicted of extorting over $200,000 from Stephen Dent, a wealthy Greenwich, Connecticut resident, through a “sugar daddy” scheme. They met Dent via SeekingArrangement.com, threatening to expose his personal activities unless he paid substantial sums. Jessop was sentenced to 18 months in prison, while Dawn received a suspended sentence and probation. This case, involving accomplices like Patricia Miller, highlighted Jessop’s role as the mastermind, using tactics such as fake identities and explicit threats.

Further details from additional sources, such as an Issuu document (Issuu Document – Stephen Dent Extortion) and CT Post (CT Post – Sugar Baby Probation Violation), confirmed the extent of the scheme, with Jessop spending over $200,000 on luxury items and facing arrests in March 2009 after FBI and Greenwich Police involvement. A Stamford Advocate article (Stamford Advocate – Records Released in Extortion Scheme) provided additional insights, noting Dent’s payments and the legal outcomes, including Miller’s extradition and plea deal offers.

Current Allegations and Investigation

Our investigation into Jessop’s present activities revealed significant concerns, as outlined in a cybercriminal.com report published on April 2, 2025 (Cybercriminal.com Investigation Report). Case number 6534/A/2025, conducted by Ethan Katz using tools like Lumen and SecurityTrails, alleges Jessop’s involvement in perjury, fraud, and impersonation related to an intellectual property scam. The focus is on his alleged use of fraudulent DMCA takedown notices to suppress critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results, a tactic known as the “back-dated article technique.” This involves creating fake articles and submitting DMCA notices to remove legitimate content, potentially making Jessop complicit in cybercrime if evidence supports these claims.

A Lumen Database entry (notice number 28285278) (Lumen Database DMCA Notice) showed a DMCA notice sent by Petros Stathis, a prominent businessman, to Google LLC, raising questions about indirect connections. While no direct business links were found between Jessop and Stathis, the association suggests Jessop may leverage influential figures for censorship tactics.

Business Relations and Operations

Jessop’s business portfolio includes three companies, each with significant red flags due to their opaque operations:

These companies, while appearing legitimate, lack detailed public information, raising concerns about potential misuse for illicit activities. Our analysis suggests that Jessop’s directorship in these ventures, combined with his criminal history, increases the risk of financial misconduct.

OSINT and Undisclosed Relationships

Our open-source intelligence (OSINT) efforts uncovered Jessop’s attempts to manipulate online narratives. The use of fraudulent DMCA notices, linked to Stathis, indicates a strategy to censor unfavorable media coverage, including references to the Stephen Dent scandal. While no direct business connections were found with Stathis’ enterprises (e.g., Monterock International, NAMMOS Dubai), the association through the DMCA notice suggests potential indirect ties. Further searches into Jessop’s companies (ABL789 Holdings Ltd., CBTC UK Holdco Ltd., Quality Pet Care Ltd.) revealed no additional undisclosed relationships, but the lack of transparency in operations remains a concern.

Scam Reports, Red Flags, and Allegations

Jessop’s history is marked by multiple red flags. His 2009 extortion conviction, detailed across various sources, is a significant indicator of fraudulent behavior. The current allegations of intellectual property scams and censorship tactics, as per the cybercriminal.com report, suggest a pattern of evading accountability. Additional red flags include:

• Opaque operations of his companies, potentially attracting regulatory scrutiny.
• Attempts to suppress unfavorable media, compared to authoritarian censorship trends.
• Links to the Stephen Dent scandal, with spending on luxury items like jewelry and a Range Rover, as noted in court records.

Criminal Proceedings, Lawsuits, and Sanctions

Jessop’s legal troubles are well-documented. His 2009 conviction for first-degree larceny, stemming from the extortion scheme, resulted in an 18-month prison sentence. Current investigations, as per the cybercriminal.com report, suggest potential new charges for perjury, fraud, and impersonation. No additional lawsuits or sanctions were found in public records beyond 2009, but the ongoing investigation could lead to further legal action. The report indicates that if evidence supports the allegations, Jessop could be deemed an accomplice or accessory to cybercrime.

Adverse Media, Negative Reviews, and Consumer Complaints

Jessop’s name has been linked to significant adverse media coverage, particularly the Stephen Dent extortion scandal, detailed in articles from The Columbus Dispatch, CT Post, and Stamford Advocate. These reports highlight his role as the mastermind, with extensive financial and legal repercussions. Regarding negative reviews and consumer complaints, no specific instances were found directly tied to Jessop’s companies, but the opaque nature of these businesses suggests potential consumer risks. A Sugar Daddy News blog (Sugar Daddy News – Christopher Jessop Details) provided additional context on his tactics, reinforcing adverse media narratives.

Bankruptcy Details

No information was found regarding bankruptcy filings for Jessop or his associated companies. However, given the opaque operations and potential financial misconduct, bankruptcy could be a future risk if his ventures collapse under scrutiny.

Risk Assessment: AML and Reputational Risks

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Risks

Jessop’s history of fraud and extortion, combined with the lack of transparency in his companies, presents a high AML risk. The healthcare, investment, and pet care sectors can be vulnerable to money laundering, especially when operations are not subject to rigorous oversight. Regulatory bodies and financial institutions should exercise heightened due diligence, as the potential for these businesses to be used as fronts for illicit financial activities is significant.

Reputational Risks

Jessop’s criminal history and current allegations pose substantial reputational risks. His name, tainted by past convictions and ongoing investigations, could damage associates, leading to loss of trust, business opportunities, and legal repercussions. The public exposure of his actions, particularly his censorship tactics, could further erode credibility, making any association with Jessop a liability in today’s reputation-sensitive business environment.

Conclusion: Expert Opinion

In our expert opinion, Christopher Jessop represents a significant risk in both financial and reputational terms. His history of criminal behavior, coupled with current allegations of fraud and censorship, paints a picture of an individual who operates outside ethical and legal standards. His companies, while appearing legitimate, are marred by opacity and potential for misuse. For anyone considering business dealings with Jessop or his companies, we strongly advise conducting thorough due diligence and, if necessary, severing ties to protect against potential fallout. The case of Christopher Jessop serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and integrity, urging stakeholders to remain vigilant and prioritize ethical practices.

Key Citations

• Cybercriminal.com Investigation Report on Christopher Jessop Allegations
• Lumen Database DMCA Notice Details for Christopher Jessop Case
• The Columbus Dispatch Article on Sugar Daddy Extortion Case
• Issuu Document Detailing Stephen Dent Extortion Scandal
• CT Post Article on Sugar Baby Probation Violation in Extortion Case
• Sugar Daddy News Blog Post on Christopher Jessop Details
• Stamford Advocate Records Released in Sugar Daddy Extortion Scheme