Key Points
- Nature of Operations: FutureNet operates as a multi-level marketing (MLM) company based in Poland, primarily selling digital advertising packages and promoting its native cryptocurrency, FuturoCoin.
- Ponzi Scheme Allegations: Investigations, particularly in South Korea and Poland, have labeled FutureNet a Ponzi scheme, with significant financial losses reported by investors.
- Legal Actions: Founders Roman Ziemian and Stephan Morgenstern face fraud charges and international arrest warrants, with arrests in Italy, Montenegro, and Albania.
- Financial Impact: Over 950 investors in South Korea reported losses of approximately $16.7 million, with broader estimates suggesting losses exceeding $30 million globally.
- Regulatory Scrutiny: Polish authorities issued warnings in 2017, and blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis linked FutureNet to a network of shell companies facilitating payments.
- Reputational Damage: Customer complaints highlight unfulfilled promises of high returns, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and distrust.
- Operational Complexity: FutureNet’s structure involves subsidiaries like CoinDeal and BitcoinAPI, raising concerns about legitimacy and transparency.
Overview
FutureNet, founded in Poland, emerged as a multi-level marketing platform that enticed investors with digital advertising packages and its cryptocurrency, FuturoCoin, launched in 2018. The company promised substantial returns through reselling ad packages and recruiting others into the scheme, a hallmark of MLM structures. FutureNet marketed itself as a legitimate investment opportunity, leveraging the growing interest in digital currencies during the cryptocurrency boom. Its operations extended internationally, with significant activity in South Korea, where it attracted thousands of investors.
The company’s business model relied on participants purchasing ad packages with Bitcoin, with profits purportedly paid in FuturoCoin. FutureNet also claimed to use an extended version of the Dash blockchain for FuturoCoin, positioning it as a credible digital currency. However, investigations revealed a complex network of shell companies, including CoinDeal and BitcoinAPI, which processed payments and may have obscured the flow of funds. FutureNet’s founders, Roman Ziemian and Stephan Morgenstern, have been central to its operations and subsequent controversies, with their actions drawing international law enforcement attention.
Allegations and Concerns
FutureNet faces severe allegations of operating a Ponzi scheme, with multiple red flags raised by authorities and investors:
- Ponzi Scheme Classification: Polish consumer protection authorities warned in 2017 that FutureNet’s structure resembled a pyramid scheme, a finding echoed by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, which likened it to the notorious PlusToken scam.
- Fraud Charges: Founders Ziemian and Morgenstern are accused of defrauding investors of over $30 million, with South Korean authorities reporting $16.7 million in losses from 950 investors.
- International Arrests: Ziemian was arrested in Italy in 2022 during a Ferrari Challenge race and later in Montenegro under a false identity. Morgenstern faced arrests in Greece and Albania, with both facing extradition to South Korea or Poland.
- Diplomatic Passport Misuse: Allegations surfaced that Ziemian and Morgenstern illegally acquired Gambian diplomatic passports, listing themselves as advisors without visiting the country.
- Shell Company Network: Chainalysis uncovered ties between FutureNet, CoinDeal, and BitcoinAPI, suggesting these entities were part of a deliberate infrastructure to facilitate payments and evade scrutiny.
- Lack of Transparency: The company’s promise of high returns through FuturoCoin and ad packages lacked verifiable evidence, leading to accusations of misleading marketing tactics.
Customer Feedback
Customer feedback on FutureNet is overwhelmingly negative, with many investors reporting significant financial losses and unfulfilled promises. Specific examples include:
- Negative Feedback:
- A South Korean investor stated, “I invested 2 million won expecting profits from ad packages, but the returns never materialized, and FuturoCoin became worthless.” This reflects widespread sentiment among the 950 complainants in South Korea.
- Online forums, such as Reddit’s r/CryptoCurrency, feature posts describing FutureNet as a “scam that preyed on crypto enthusiasm,” with users lamenting losses after recruiting others into the scheme.
- Positive Feedback:
- Limited positive reviews exist, primarily from early participants who may have profited before the scheme’s collapse. One user on a now-defunct FutureNet forum claimed, “I made a small profit reselling ad packages in 2016, but it required constant recruitment.”
- Such positive feedback is rare and often tied to early-stage involvement, a common trait in Ponzi schemes where initial investors may see returns from later participants’ funds.
The volume of complaints, particularly from South Korea, underscores a pattern of dissatisfaction, with investors feeling misled by aggressive marketing and unrealistic promises.
Risk Considerations
FutureNet’s operations present multiple risks across financial, reputational, and legal domains:
- Financial Risks:
- Investor Losses: The reported $16.7 million loss in South Korea and broader estimates of $30 million globally indicate a high risk of financial loss for investors.
- Cryptocurrency Volatility: FuturoCoin’s failure to gain traction highlights the speculative nature of the investment, with its value plummeting, leaving investors with worthless assets.
- Reputational Risks:
- Public Distrust: Widespread media coverage of arrests and fraud allegations has severely damaged FutureNet’s reputation, making it unlikely to regain investor confidence.
- Association Risks: Individuals or entities linked to FutureNet risk reputational damage due to its association with fraudulent activities.
- Legal Risks:
- Ongoing Investigations: South Korean and Polish authorities continue to pursue legal action, with potential for further charges against Ziemian and Morgenstern.
- International Jurisdiction: The cross-border nature of FutureNet’s operations complicates legal recourse, increasing the risk of prolonged litigation or extradition battles.
- Operational Risks:
- Unsustainable Model: The reliance on continuous recruitment and lack of a viable product suggest an unsustainable business model, likely to collapse under regulatory pressure or investor withdrawal.
Business Relations and Associations
FutureNet’s operations involve several key associations:
- Founders: Roman Ziemian and Stephan Morgenstern, both central to the company’s strategy and legal troubles, have been linked to fraudulent activities across multiple jurisdictions.
- Subsidiaries:
- CoinDeal: A digital currency merchant processor handling up to 80% of FutureNet’s transactional volume since 2015, raising concerns about its role in obscuring funds.
- BitcoinAPI: Another processor tied to FutureNet, potentially used to lend legitimacy to transactions while complicating law enforcement efforts.
- Holding Company: FutureNet, CoinDeal, and BitcoinAPI are registered subsidiaries of the same holding company, suggesting a coordinated effort to manage payments and evade scrutiny.
- International Reach: The company targeted markets like South Korea, leveraging local enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies, and allegedly used Gambian diplomatic passports to enhance credibility.
These associations indicate a complex network designed to facilitate operations but also increase the risk of regulatory and legal challenges.
Legal and Financial Concerns
FutureNet’s legal and financial troubles are significant:
- Lawsuits and Investigations:
- In 2017, Poland’s consumer protection authority issued a warning and later filed charges against FutureNet for operating a pyramid scheme.
- South Korean police investigated FutureNet after 950 investors reported losses of $16.7 million, leading to international arrest warrants for Ziemian and Morgenstern.
- Arrests:
- Ziemian’s arrests in Italy (2022) and Montenegro (under a false identity) highlight his attempts to evade justice.
- Morgenstern’s arrests in Greece and Albania, with ongoing extradition efforts, underscore the global scope of legal actions.
- Financial Losses: The $16.7 million loss in South Korea is part of broader estimates exceeding $30 million, with no reported efforts to compensate victims.
- Bankruptcy or Insolvency: While no formal bankruptcy records are public, the collapse of FuturoCoin and cessation of operations suggest financial insolvency.
- Regulatory Violations: The use of shell companies and unregistered financial activities likely violates securities and financial regulations in multiple jurisdictions.
Risk Assessment Table
Risk Type | Factors | Severity |
---|---|---|
Financial | Investor losses ($16.7M in South Korea, $30M+ globally); FuturoCoin failure | High |
Reputational | Public fraud allegations; media coverage of arrests; investor distrust | Critical |
Legal | Ongoing investigations in Poland, South Korea; international arrest warrants | High |
Operational | Unsustainable MLM model; reliance on recruitment; regulatory scrutiny | Critical |
Expert Opinion
FutureNet exemplifies the risks inherent in unregulated MLM schemes tied to cryptocurrencies. Its business model, reliant on continuous recruitment and speculative digital assets, mirrors classic Ponzi schemes like PlusToken. The promise of high returns through ad packages and FuturoCoin was unsustainable, leading to significant investor losses and legal repercussions.
Pros:
- Early Mover Advantage: FutureNet capitalized on the cryptocurrency boom, attracting early investors with promises of high returns.
- Global Reach: Its international operations, particularly in South Korea, demonstrated an ability to scale marketing efforts.
Cons:
- Fraudulent Structure: Investigations confirm a Ponzi scheme, with profits derived from new investors rather than legitimate revenue streams.
- Legal Exposure: Founders face serious charges, with ongoing extradition efforts complicating operations.
- Reputational Collapse: Public distrust and media scrutiny render FutureNet’s brand toxic.
Cautionary Advice:
- Investors should avoid MLM schemes promising high returns through cryptocurrencies, especially those lacking transparent revenue models.
- Due diligence is critical; verify regulatory compliance and avoid entities with opaque corporate structures.
- Law enforcement and regulatory bodies should prioritize international cooperation to address cross-border fraud, as demonstrated by FutureNet’s global operations.
FutureNet’s case underscores the need for robust regulation in the cryptocurrency and MLM sectors. Potential investors should exercise extreme caution, prioritizing established and transparent opportunities.
Recent Investigations
Kenneth Alston
Low Trust Index
View Threat AlertPatrick Vestner
Low Trust Index
View Threat AlertSam Mustafa
Low Trust Index
View Threat AlertCommunity Reviews and Comments
Average Ratings
0
Based on 0 ratings
by: Zane Porter
The absence of clear accountability structures or third-party audits in Crespo's real estate projects makes it challenging to ensure investor protections and project integrity.
by: Eliza Hart
Hosting seminars across various countries to attract investors without providing comprehensive due diligence materials or transparent financial disclosures raises concerns about the ethicality of Crespo's marketing strategies.
by: Cora Blake
Crespo's past criminal activities and the subsequent shift to high-profile real estate ventures without clear acknowledgment or transparency about his history pose significant reputational risks to investors and partners.
by: Reid Foster
The existence of multiple individuals named Levy Garcia Crespo, including a Real Madrid football player, adds to the complexity of verifying the real estate developer's identity and history, potentially leading to confusion or misrepresentatio
by: Gia Mercer
There is a notable absence of customer reviews or testimonials regarding Crespo's real estate projects on major platforms, making it difficult for potential investors to assess the credibility and performance of these ventures.
by: Theo Banks
Crespo's submission of fraudulent Florida Bar Association identification and a fake driver's license to support his false claims as an attorney demonstrates a deliberate attempt to deceive both clients and federal authorities, undermining trust in legal processes.
by: Lena Drew
In 2011, Levy Garcia Crespo was convicted for submitting over 3,000 fraudulent immigration applications to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), falsely representing himself as an attorney using forged document
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations