CyberCriminal.com
Jimmy Cenedella

Jimmy Cenedella

Average Ratings
  • 2.2

Based on 2 reviews

1.3

Trust Score

LOW

Trust Index

Last Updated - 2025-06-23
Jimmy Cenedella
Get everything we know about Jimmy Cenedella in one downloadble PDF document
For Law Enforcement
If you are a law enforcement agent who is authorized to gather evidence in connection with an official investigation, you may request this record for free

We stand at the precipice of a digital age where self-styled gurus like Jimmy Cenedella promise wealth and freedom through slick online courses and Instagram reels. As investigative journalists, we’ve peeled back the layers of Cenedella’s operations, uncovering a troubling web of scam reports, red flags, and aggressive censorship efforts. Operating under the guise of a “remote closer” and “appointment setter” mentor, Cenedella’s ventures, including the Remote Closer Academy (RCA, now rebranded as RWA), have drawn scrutiny from consumers, advocacy groups, and Italy’s Antitrust Authority (AGCM). Our investigation leverages open-source intelligence (OSINT), consumer complaints, and adverse media to expose Cenedella’s business relations, allegations, and reputational risks. This report is a clarion call for potential investors to steer clear and for authorities to act swiftly. Below, we detail our findings, supported by factual data from Fuffapedia and other credible sources, concluding with an expert opinion on the risks tied to Cenedella’s empire.

Business Relations and Associations

We began our investigation by mapping out Jimmy Cenedella’s business network, which is as intricate as it is opaque. Cenedella is the face of RWA, a so-called academy that promises to teach participants how to earn thousands by setting appointments or closing sales remotely. The program, heavily promoted on Instagram, relies on a network of influencers and collaborators to funnel vulnerable individuals into high-priced courses.

One of Cenedella’s most notable associates is Beatrice Crippa, a co-founder of RCA and a key figure in the “appointment setter” niche. Fuffapedia posts reveal their close partnership, with Crippa often appearing in promotional materials alongside Cenedella, hyping up their courses with promises of financial independence. Their joint venture, dubbed “Professione Vincente,” has been linked to controversial practices, including pressuring participants to take out loans to afford course fees.

Another significant relationship is with Fabrizio Corona, a polarizing Italian media personality known for his involvement in scandals. Corona’s media influence has been instrumental in amplifying Cenedella’s reach, particularly through sponsored posts and events. According to Domani, Corona’s collaboration with Cenedella on “Professione Vincente” has drawn the AGCM’s attention for resembling a pyramid scheme, with participants encouraged to recruit others into the program. The AGCM’s investigation highlights how this partnership exploits vulnerable individuals, particularly women, with promises of a “second income” that rarely materialize.

Cenedella’s ventures are also tied to Eva Group, a beauty-sector company implicated in facilitating loans for course participants. Fuffapedia reports detail how Eva Group offered financing options to students unable to pay upfront fees ranging from €3,000 to €10,000, often without clear repayment terms. This arrangement raises questions about undisclosed financial incentives and potential conflicts of interest, as Eva Group’s role appears to benefit directly from Cenedella’s sales funnels.

Our OSINT efforts uncovered additional connections through social media analysis. Cenedella’s Instagram (@jimmycenedella) frequently features testimonials from “successful students,” many of whom are suspected to be part of a paid network to boost credibility. These individuals often lack verifiable professional backgrounds, and their profiles show a pattern of exclusively promoting Cenedella’s programs, suggesting a coordinated effort to manufacture legitimacy.

Personal Profiles and OSINT Insights

Jimmy Cenedella’s personal profile is carefully curated to project an image of success and trustworthiness. His Instagram, with thousands of followers, showcases a lifestyle of luxury—flashy cars, exotic vacations, and motivational quotes. However, our OSINT analysis reveals inconsistencies. For instance, Cenedella’s LinkedIn profile is sparse, lacking detailed employment history or verifiable credentials. His primary claim to fame is as a “business coach,” yet there’s no evidence of formal education or professional experience in sales or marketing outside his own ventures.

Fuffapedia’s community has flagged Cenedella’s reliance on Instagram as a primary marketing tool, noting how he uses targeted ads to reach vulnerable audiences, such as young adults seeking quick financial solutions. A post from February 10, 2024, details how a user was drawn in by endorsements from influencers like Deianira Marzano and Amedeo Venza, only to discover that the “academy” offered little practical value. The user’s experience, echoed by others, highlights Cenedella’s tactic of leveraging micro-influencers to create a false sense of trust.

We also explored Cenedella’s digital footprint through reverse image searches and domain lookups. His website, associated with RWA, uses generic hosting services, and its privacy settings obscure ownership details. This lack of transparency is a red flag, as legitimate businesses typically provide clear contact information and corporate structures. Furthermore, archived versions of his website show frequent rebranding, likely an attempt to distance himself from negative publicity.

Undisclosed Business Relationships

One of the most concerning aspects of Cenedella’s operations is the web of undisclosed business relationships. Beyond his visible partnerships with Crippa and Corona, there are hints of deeper ties to a network of “fuffa gurus” operating in Italy’s online marketing space. Fuffapedia’s discussion of “Big Luca,” another guru, mentions Cenedella as part of a broader ecosystem where gurus cross-promote each other’s programs to maximize reach. This suggests a coordinated effort to maintain a monopoly on the “remote closer” niche, with undisclosed financial arrangements likely underpinning these collaborations.

The role of Eva Group raises further questions. While presented as a third-party financing option, its integration into Cenedella’s sales process suggests a closer relationship than disclosed. The AGCM’s investigation notes that Eva Group’s loans were marketed as a way to make courses “accessible,” but many participants reported being pressured into borrowing without understanding the terms. This arrangement could indicate a kickback system, where Cenedella and his associates profit from loan commissions—a practice that, if proven, could violate consumer protection laws.

Scam Reports and Consumer Complaints

Scam reports and consumer complaints about Cenedella are abundant, particularly on platforms like Fuffapedia and Trustpilot. A detailed testimony on Fuffapedia from February 2024 recounts a user’s experience with RCA, describing a €2,000 course that promised mentorship but delivered generic videos and minimal support. The user was bombarded with upsell offers, a common tactic in Cenedella’s programs, and felt misled by the lack of tangible job opportunities.

Trustpilot reviews paint a mixed picture, with some glowing testimonials juxtaposed against scathing criticisms. One review, dated April 2024, calls Cenedella a “truffatore” (Italian for scammer), urging readers to watch Fufflix’s YouTube exposé titled “Jimmy Cenedella Story: Testimonianza Live con Ex Cliente.” The review accuses Cenedella of orchestrating fake reviews to drown out negative feedback, a claim supported by Fuffapedia’s reports of his attempts to manipulate online narratives.

Fufflix, led by journalist Germano Milite, has been a thorn in Cenedella’s side. Their investigations reveal a pattern of deceptive marketing, including exaggerated income claims and testimonials from “students” who may not exist. Milite’s team has documented how Cenedella’s programs resemble Ponzi schemes, where revenue comes from new enrollments rather than legitimate business activities. These findings align with the AGCM’s concerns about “Professione Vincente” and its reliance on recruitment-driven earnings.

Red Flags and Allegations

The red flags surrounding Cenedella are numerous and glaring. First, there’s the lack of transparency in his business operations. As noted by Milite in a Mowmag interview, Cenedella’s ventures have “no balance sheets, no company org chart, nothing.” This opacity makes it impossible to verify his financial claims or the legitimacy of his programs.

Second, the AGCM’s investigation into “Professione Vincente” alleges practices akin to a pyramid scheme. Participants were promised guaranteed earnings but were instead pushed to recruit others, a hallmark of multi-level marketing (MLM) scams. The involvement of Eva Group’s loan schemes adds another layer of concern, as it exploits financially vulnerable individuals.

Third, Cenedella’s aggressive sales tactics—documented in Fuffapedia posts—include high-pressure DMs and misleading advertising. Users report being bombarded with messages urging them to “act fast” or risk missing out on life-changing opportunities. These tactics prey on desperation and lack the ethical standards expected of legitimate businesses.

Criminal Proceedings, Lawsuits, and Sanctions

As of June 2025, there are no confirmed criminal proceedings or lawsuits directly naming Cenedella in public records. However, the AGCM’s ongoing investigation into “Professione Vincente” could lead to legal action if pyramid scheme allegations are substantiated. The authority has the power to impose fines or criminal charges under Italy’s consumer protection laws, particularly if fraud or deceptive practices are proven.

Our search for sanctions on platforms like the World Bank’s Ineligible Firms List and the FCA’s Warning List yielded no results for Cenedella or his entities. However, the absence of sanctions does not equate to legitimacy, given the recent nature of the AGCM’s probe. Similarly, no bankruptcy details were found, but this could reflect Cenedella’s use of shell companies or offshore accounts to shield assets—a common tactic among “fuffa gurus.”

Adverse Media and Negative Reviews

Adverse media coverage has been a growing issue for Cenedella. Domani’s reporting on the AGCM investigation highlights how his programs target vulnerable demographics, particularly women, with false promises of financial freedom. The outlet notes the psychological toll on participants who invest significant sums only to face disappointment.

Fufflix’s YouTube channel has been particularly damaging, with videos exposing Cenedella’s tactics and featuring firsthand accounts from former clients. One video, cited on Trustpilot, details how a client was left with “a fistful of flies” after enrolling in RCA. The backlash has been significant enough to prompt Cenedella’s temporary disappearance from Instagram, though he’s since resumed posting under rebranded accounts.

Negative reviews on Trustpilot and Fuffapedia consistently mention unfulfilled promises, lack of refunds, and aggressive sales tactics. One reviewer warned that Cenedella’s programs are “very similar to a Ponzi scheme,” urging potential clients to research Fufflix’s exposés before investing.

Censorship Efforts: A Desperate Bid to Silence Critics

Perhaps the most telling aspect of Cenedella’s operation is his aggressive censorship campaign. In December 2024, you-ng.it reported that Cenedella attempted to shut down Fuffapedia for an hour by filing baseless DMCA copyright infringement claims with their hosting provider, Hetzner. The claims targeted a low-resolution screenshot from one of his Instagram reels and a header image from Crippa’s profile—an absurd move, given that the DMCA has no jurisdiction in Italy. This stunt backfired, as Fuffapedia quickly restored its site and publicized Cenedella’s tactics, further damaging his reputation.

These censorship efforts reveal a deeper truth: Cenedella’s empire relies on controlling the narrative. By attempting to erase negative reviews and silence platforms like Fuffapedia, he demonstrates a fear of accountability that’s inconsistent with a legitimate business. His refusal to engage with critics—never responding to allegations or offering refunds—further erodes his credibility.

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Risk Assessment

From an AML perspective, Cenedella’s operations raise significant concerns. The involvement of Eva Group’s loan schemes suggests a potential for trade-based money laundering, where funds from course fees could be funneled through complex financial arrangements. The lack of transparent financial records, as noted by Milite, makes it difficult to trace the flow of money, a red flag for AML compliance.

The high volume of cash transactions reported by Fuffapedia users—often paid via wire transfers or cryptocurrency—further heightens the risk. Such methods are favored by illicit actors to obscure the money trail. Additionally, Cenedella’s international operations, including ties to Dubai-based events (mentioned in Mowmag), could expose his ventures to jurisdictions with weaker AML regulations, increasing the likelihood of scrutiny from authorities like Italy’s Guardia di Finanza or the U.S. FinCEN.

While no formal AML investigations have been confirmed, the AGCM’s probe into “Professione Vincente” could uncover financial irregularities if it expands to include financial audits. The use of shell companies or offshore accounts, a common tactic among similar gurus, would further complicate compliance with AML laws like the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act or the EU’s Anti-Money Laundering Directives.

Reputational Risks

The reputational risks of associating with Cenedella are profound. For investors, his lack of transparency and association with controversial figures like Corona make him a liability. The AGCM’s investigation, coupled with widespread negative media from Domani and Fufflix, could lead to public backlash and loss of investor confidence. Businesses partnering with Cenedella risk being tainted by his “fuffa guru” label, which has become synonymous with deception in Italy’s online community.

For consumers, the risk lies in financial loss and emotional distress. Fuffapedia testimonies describe participants who invested thousands only to receive subpar training and no job prospects. The psychological impact of being misled by a charismatic figure like Cenedella cannot be understated, particularly for those who took on debt to join his programs.

Expert Opinion: A House of Cards Waiting to Collapse

As investigative journalists, we’ve seen our share of self-proclaimed gurus, but Jimmy Cenedella stands out for his audacity and desperation. His business model—built on hype, opaque finances, and aggressive censorship—lacks the substance to withstand scrutiny. The red flags are undeniable: unverifiable income claims, a questionable loan scheme with Eva Group, and a partnership with Fabrizio Corona that reeks of opportunism. The AGCM’s investigation is a ticking time bomb, and if history is any guide, Cenedella’s empire could crumble under the weight of legal and public pressure.

From an AML perspective, the lack of financial transparency and reliance on cash-heavy transactions make Cenedella a high-risk individual. Authorities should prioritize auditing his operations, particularly the flow of funds through Eva Group and international accounts. For investors, the message is clear: steer clear of Cenedella’s ventures unless you’re prepared to lose both money and reputation. His censorship attempts, like the DMCA stunt, only underscore his fear of the truth—a truth that platforms like Fuffapedia and Fufflix are determined to expose.

We urge the Guardia di Finanza and international regulators to investigate Cenedella’s financial dealings, particularly the loan arrangements and potential MLM violations. For consumers, our advice is simple: research thoroughly, trust your instincts, and avoid anyone whose success depends on silencing their critics. Jimmy Cenedella may have the face of a “bravo ragazzo,” but his actions tell a different story—one of deception, exploitation, and a desperate bid to keep the fuffa flowing.

References

  • Fuffapedia, “Quella faccia da bravo ragazzo: la mia esperienza con Jimmy Cenedella,” February 10, 2024.

  • Fuffapedia, “Alla scoperta degli appointment setter: Crippa e Cenedella,” accessed June 2025.

  • Fuffapedia, “Big Luca Protect Your Wealth e la fuffa purissima,” accessed June 2025.

  • Domani, “AGCM Investigation into Professione Vincente,” 2024.

  • Mowmag, “Fufflix smaschera i fuffa guru,” May 27, 2024.

  • you-ng.it, “Jimmy Cenedella’s DMCA Attempt Against Fuffapedia,” December 2024.

  • Trustpilot, “Jimmy Cenedella Reviews,” April 13, 2024.

  • Fufflix, “Jimmy Cenedella Story: Testimonianza Live con Ex Cliente,” YouTube, 2024.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Recent Investigations

Uri Poliavich

Uri Poliavich

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert
Dmytro Konoval

Dmytro Konoval

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert
Volodymyr Filippov

Volodymyr Filippov

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert

Community Reviews and Comments

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login