CyberCriminal.com
Mo Yuk Ping

Mo Yuk Ping

Average Ratings
  • 1.9

Based on 7 reviews

1.7

Trust Score

LOW

Trust Index

Last Updated - 2025-05-15
Mo Yuk Ping
Get everything we know about Mo Yuk Ping in one downloadble PDF document
For Law Enforcement
If you are a law enforcement agent who is authorized to gather evidence in connection with an official investigation, you may request this record for free

Key Points

  • Mo Yuk Ping, a former general manager of Shanghai Land Holdings Limited, was convicted in 2006 for market manipulation and perverting justice in Hong Kong.
  • She was sentenced to three and a half years in prison, with over $5.8 million in illicit gains confiscated from accounts used in the scheme.
  • Mo’s name appears in the ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database, linked to offshore entities, though inclusion does not inherently imply illegal activity.
  • Allegations include interfering with a witness in a share manipulation trial and frustrating a Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) investigation.
  • No direct evidence connects Mo Yuk Ping to cybercrime, despite the provided source link suggesting an investigation in that context.
  • Legal records indicate appeals to Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal, reflecting significant legal battles post-conviction.
  • Limited public information exists on Mo’s current activities or associations, suggesting a low profile since the 2006 convictions.

Overview

Mo Yuk Ping is an individual primarily known for her role as the former general manager of Shanghai Land Holdings Limited, a publicly listed company in Hong Kong. In the early 2000s, she was implicated in a high-profile financial misconduct case involving market manipulation and obstruction of justice. Her professional background prior to this incident likely involved corporate management within the financial or real estate sectors, given her senior role at Shanghai Land. The 2006 convictions marked a significant turning point in her public record, leading to imprisonment and financial penalties.

Mo’s name also appears in the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) Offshore Leaks Database, which documents individuals and entities linked to offshore companies and trusts. This database, covering records up to 2020, includes her as an officer or intermediary, though the ICIJ emphasizes that such listings do not necessarily indicate illegal conduct. Beyond these records, little is known about her current professional or personal activities, as she appears to have maintained a low profile following her legal troubles. There is no verifiable information linking her to ongoing business ventures or public roles as of May 2025.

Allegations and Concerns

Mo Yuk Ping faced serious allegations related to financial crimes in Hong Kong, culminating in her 2006 convictions. The primary charges included:

  • Market Manipulation: Mo was found guilty of manipulating the trading of Shanghai Land Holdings Limited shares. She allegedly used “dummy” securities accounts to artificially influence share prices, undermining the integrity of Hong Kong’s financial system.
  • Perverting Justice: She was accused of interfering with a witness in a share manipulation trial and frustrating an investigation by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This involved attempts to obstruct regulatory efforts to uncover the manipulation scheme.
  • Legal Appeals: Mo appealed her convictions, with cases reaching the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, as documented in legal records from 2006. These appeals suggest she contested the charges or sentencing, though specific outcomes beyond the initial convictions are less clear in public records.

These allegations highlight a pattern of serious financial misconduct, with implications for market integrity and regulatory compliance. The lack of recent allegations or public activity may indicate either a cessation of such behavior or a deliberate effort to avoid scrutiny.

Customer Feedback

As Mo Yuk Ping is an individual, not a business, traditional customer feedback or consumer reviews are not applicable. Instead, this section considers public and stakeholder perceptions based on available records:

  • Negative Perceptions: The 2006 convictions generated significant negative attention, as reported in legal and financial news. The court’s ruling, which emphasized the damage to Hong Kong’s financial system, likely eroded trust among investors and regulators. For example, Judge Alan Wright noted that the offenses “undermined the integrity of Hong Kong’s financial system, being a matter not just of local but of international interest.”
  • Neutral or Absent Feedback: There are no documented positive or neutral reviews from stakeholders, as Mo’s public profile is dominated by her legal troubles. The absence of recent feedback suggests she has not been publicly active in a professional capacity since the convictions.
  • Offshore Database Context: The ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database listing does not provide direct feedback but notes that many individuals with similar names may exist, urging caution in associating Mo with illegal activity based solely on this record.

The lack of consumer-style feedback limits this section, but the negative sentiment from legal proceedings and media coverage is significant.

Risk Considerations

Engaging with or researching Mo Yuk Ping involves several risks, primarily stemming from her past convictions and limited current visibility:

  • Reputational Risk: Association with an individual convicted of market manipulation and perverting justice could damage the credibility of businesses, investors, or partners. The high-profile nature of the case in Hong Kong’s financial sector amplifies this risk.
  • Legal Risk: Mo’s history of obstructing regulatory investigations suggests potential challenges in ensuring compliance with financial regulations. Any future involvement with her could attract scrutiny from authorities like the SFC.
  • Financial Risk: The confiscation of over $5.8 million in illicit gains indicates significant financial misconduct. Any financial dealings with Mo could carry risks of hidden liabilities or further regulatory action.
  • Information Gaps: The lack of current information on Mo’s activities creates uncertainty, making it difficult to assess whether she poses ongoing risks or has reformed. This opacity could complicate due diligence efforts.

These risks are particularly relevant for financial institutions, investors, or regulators considering interactions with Mo or entities linked to her.

Business Relations and Associations

Mo Yuk Ping’s known associations are primarily tied to her role at Shanghai Land Holdings Limited and the individuals involved in her legal case:

  • Shanghai Land Holdings Limited: As former general manager, Mo worked closely with the company’s operations and likely interacted with its board, shareholders, and employees. Her actions in manipulating share prices involved coordination with others, including her personal assistant, Chung Sau-ling, who was also convicted.
  • Chung Sau-ling: Chung, Mo’s personal assistant, received a three-year prison sentence for her role in the market manipulation scheme, indicating a close professional relationship.
  • Wong Pui-fai: A practicing solicitor involved in the case, Wong was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment for his role in obstructing the SFC investigation. His involvement suggests legal and professional ties to Mo during the incident.
  • Offshore Entities: The ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database lists Mo as an officer or intermediary for certain offshore entities, though specifics are limited. These entities may involve other individuals or companies, but the database does not confirm illegal activity.
  • Regulatory Bodies: Mo’s interactions with the SFC and Hong Kong’s judicial system, including the Court of Final Appeal, indicate adversarial relationships with regulators and law enforcement.

No current business relations or partnerships are documented, suggesting Mo has not publicly re-entered the corporate or financial sectors.

Legal and Financial Concerns

The primary legal and financial concerns stem from Mo’s 2006 convictions and related activities:

  • Convictions and Sentencing: Mo was sentenced to three and a half years in prison for market manipulation and perverting justice. The court ordered the confiscation of over $5.8 million from “dummy” accounts used in the scheme, indicating significant financial penalties.
  • Legal Appeals: Records from the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (2006) show Mo pursued appeals, though the outcomes are not fully detailed in public sources. These appeals reflect ongoing legal battles and potential unresolved issues.
  • Offshore Leaks Database: Mo’s inclusion in the ICIJ database raises questions about her involvement with offshore entities. While not inherently illegal, such activities often attract scrutiny for potential tax evasion or money laundering, though no specific allegations are confirmed here.
  • No Bankruptcy Records: There are no public records indicating bankruptcy or unpaid debts, but the confiscation of assets suggests significant financial losses from her illicit activities.

These concerns highlight a history of serious legal and financial misconduct, with lasting implications for Mo’s credibility and financial status.

Risk Assessment Table

Risk Type Risk Factors Severity
Reputational Convictions for market manipulation and perverting justice; negative media coverage High
Legal History of obstructing SFC investigations; potential for future regulatory scrutiny High
Financial Confiscation of $5.8 million in illicit gains; potential hidden liabilities Medium
Operational Limited current information; difficulty verifying ongoing activities Medium
Cybersecurity No direct evidence of cybercrime involvement; questionable source link raises concerns Low

Expert Opinion

Mo Yuk Ping’s documented history paints a picture of an individual involved in significant financial misconduct in the early 2000s, with serious consequences for her professional and legal standing. Her convictions for market manipulation and perverting justice reflect a deliberate effort to undermine financial markets, resulting in a substantial prison sentence and asset confiscation. The involvement of accomplices like Chung Sau-ling and Wong Pui-fai suggests a coordinated scheme, raising questions about her judgment and ethical conduct.

Pros:

  • No recent allegations or public activity suggest Mo may have withdrawn from illegal or high-profile activities.
  • Her inclusion in the ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database does not inherently imply wrongdoing, as offshore entities have legitimate uses.

Cons:

  • The severity of her 2006 convictions, including a multi-year prison sentence and significant financial penalties, indicates a high-risk profile.
  • The lack of current information makes it challenging to assess whether she has reformed or remains a risk.
  • The questionable source link (cybercriminal.com) raises concerns about potential misinformation or unverified claims linking her to cybercrime, which are not substantiated by credible records.

Cautionary Advice: Individuals or entities considering engagement with Mo Yuk Ping should exercise extreme caution. Her history of financial crimes and regulatory obstruction suggests a high risk of reputational and legal complications. Due diligence is critical, including verifying her current activities and ensuring compliance with financial regulations. The absence of recent public records necessitates thorough background checks, potentially through legal or financial databases like vLex or the ICIJ. Until more information is available, any association with Mo should be approached with skepticism.

Key Citations

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Recent Investigations

Uri Poliavich

Uri Poliavich

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert
Dmytro Konoval

Dmytro Konoval

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert
Volodymyr Filippov

Volodymyr Filippov

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert

Community Reviews and Comments

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login