CyberCriminal.com
Monitox Ltd

Monitox Ltd

Average Ratings
  • 2

Based on 7 reviews

1.8

Trust Score

LOW

Trust Index

Last Updated - 2025-05-15
Monitox Ltd
Get everything we know about Monitox Ltd in one downloadble PDF document
For Law Enforcement
If you are a law enforcement agent who is authorized to gather evidence in connection with an official investigation, you may request this record for free

Investigative Report on Monitox Ltd

Key Points

  • Company Identity: Monitox Ltd is a UK-registered financial technology company offering payment solutions, including virtual corporate accounts and e-banking services, authorized by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) as an e-Money Institution.
  • Regulatory Concerns: Despite FCA authorization, Monitox has been flagged for connections to unregulated entities, particularly the Papel Group, raising questions about transparency and compliance.
  • Leadership and Ownership: Controlled by Estonian national Maksim Asanov, with reported ties to Ferit Samuray, a director linked to the controversial Papel Group.
  • Allegations: Investigations highlight Monitox’s involvement with high-risk payment processing and potential misleading practices, with whistleblower reports suggesting ongoing links to Papel despite public distancing.
  • Customer Feedback: Limited public reviews are available, with no direct consumer complaints or positive testimonials found, indicating low visibility or engagement with retail clients.
  • Risk Profile: High financial and reputational risks due to opaque operations, questionable business associations, and lack of clear ownership transparency.

Overview

Monitox Ltd is a private limited company incorporated on April 17, 2019, in Scotland, UK, under company number SC627907. Headquartered at 272 Bath Street, Glasgow, G2 4JR, with an additional office at Heron Tower, 110 Bishopsgate, London, EC2N 4AY, the company operates as a financial technology provider specializing in payment solutions. Its services include virtual corporate e-accounts, e-wallets, BIN sponsorship card issuing, and SEPA (Single Euro Payments Area) immediate payment solutions, primarily targeting fintech businesses and neo-banks. Monitox is authorized by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 (Firm Reference 901012) and is registered with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) under number ZB190422 for data protection compliance.

The company markets itself as a facilitator of innovative payment solutions, emphasizing compliance, security, and tailored business services. Its website highlights a commitment to helping fintech entrepreneurs streamline payment operations through primary scheme membership access and secure transaction systems with 256-bit encryption and two-factor authentication (2FA). Monitox positions itself as a partner for businesses seeking to navigate complex payment ecosystems, with a focus on flexibility and client-centric solutions.

However, Monitox’s operations have come under scrutiny due to its reported connections with the Papel Group, a controversial entity linked to unregulated financial activities. This association, combined with limited public visibility and transparency, has raised concerns about the company’s operational integrity and reliability.

Allegations and Concerns

Monitox Ltd has faced significant allegations, primarily centered on its ties to the Papel Group, a financial services entity accused of operating in a regulatory gray area. Key concerns include:

  • Connection to Papel Group: Investigations, including reports from FinTelegram and Intelligence Line, highlight Monitox’s close ties to the Papel Group, controlled by Ferit Samuray, who is also a director at Monitox. Despite public statements distancing the two entities, whistleblower reports suggest ongoing operational links, raising red flags about Monitox’s transparency and regulatory compliance.
  • Opaque Business Practices: Monitox has been criticized for non-transparent operations, particularly regarding ownership and financial accountability. The lack of clear documentation on its corporate structure and business dealings fuels suspicions of potential financial irregularities.
  • High-Risk Payment Processing: As a high-risk payment processor, Monitox’s business model involves handling transactions that may attract regulatory scrutiny, especially given its association with entities like Papel, which have been flagged for misleading practices.
  • Regulatory Misrepresentation: While Monitox is FCA-authorized, critics argue that this authorization does not guarantee safe operations, particularly in light of its connections to unregulated entities. This discrepancy has led to concerns about the company misleading clients about its regulatory status.

These allegations have not resulted in formal legal actions or sanctions, as Monitox is not listed on international sanctions databases like OpenSanctions. However, the persistent concerns about its business practices warrant caution.

Customer Feedback

Publicly available customer feedback on Monitox Ltd is sparse, which is unusual for a company offering financial services to businesses and consumers. No direct consumer reviews, positive or negative, were found on platforms like Trustpilot, Google Reviews, or similar review aggregators. This lack of feedback could indicate limited retail client engagement, as Monitox primarily serves fintech businesses and institutional clients rather than individual consumers.

  • Positive Feedback: No specific positive testimonials or case studies are publicly available. Monitox’s website claims to prioritize customer experience and security, but these claims lack corroboration from independent sources or client endorsements.
  • Negative Feedback: Similarly, no explicit negative reviews or complaints from customers were identified in the public domain. However, the absence of feedback, combined with allegations of opaque practices, may suggest limited trust or engagement from the broader market.
  • Industry Perception: The fintech and regulatory communities, as reflected in reports from FinTelegram and Intelligence Line, express skepticism about Monitox’s operations due to its Papel Group ties. This perception indirectly impacts its reputation among potential clients.

The lack of customer feedback is a red flag in itself, as reputable financial service providers typically have a visible track record of client experiences, whether positive or negative.

Risk Considerations

Monitox Ltd presents several risks for potential clients, partners, and investors, categorized as follows:

  • Financial Risk: Engaging with Monitox carries financial risks due to its high-risk payment processing activities and questionable associations with the Papel Group. Clients may face losses if transactions are mishandled or if regulatory actions disrupt Monitox’s operations.
  • Reputational Risk: The company’s ties to controversial entities like Papel Group could damage the reputation of businesses that partner with Monitox, particularly in regulated industries like fintech and banking.
  • Regulatory Risk: Despite FCA authorization, Monitox’s connections to unregulated entities increase the likelihood of regulatory scrutiny, which could lead to operational restrictions or penalties.
  • Operational Risk: The lack of transparency in ownership and business practices raises concerns about Monitox’s operational reliability, including the potential for service disruptions or data security issues.

These risks are compounded by the company’s limited public presence and the absence of robust client testimonials, making it difficult to assess its operational stability.

Business Relations and Associations

Monitox Ltd’s most significant business association is with the Papel Group, a financial services entity with a complex and controversial history. Key details include:

  • Papel Group Connection: Monitox is closely linked to Papel Group, with Ferit Samuray serving as a director in both entities. Papel operates multiple subsidiaries, including Papel Marketing UK Limited, Papel FX Ltd in Cyprus, and TBF FINANCE UAB in Lithuania, some of which have been flagged for unregulated activities.
  • Leadership: Monitox is controlled by Maksim Asanov, an Estonian national, with Ferit Samuray playing a significant role. Samuray’s involvement in multiple high-risk financial ventures raises concerns about centralized control and potential conflicts of interest.
  • Other Entities: Monitox is also associated with Smarttekk Payment Solutions Ltd in Cyprus, where Samuray serves as a director. This web of interconnected entities suggests a complex corporate structure that lacks transparency.
  • Regulatory Oversight: While Monitox is regulated by the FCA, its ties to unregulated Papel Group entities undermine confidence in its regulatory compliance. Whistleblower reports suggest that these connections persist despite public claims of separation.

These associations highlight a pattern of interconnected operations that may prioritize profit over regulatory compliance, increasing risks for stakeholders.

Legal and Financial Concerns

No formal lawsuits, bankruptcy records, or unpaid debts are publicly documented against Monitox Ltd as of May 15, 2025. However, several concerns arise from its operational and regulatory profile:

  • No Sanctions: Monitox is not listed on international sanctions lists, as confirmed by OpenSanctions, indicating no direct legal violations at this time.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: The company’s FCA authorization (Firm Reference 901012) is overshadowed by its Papel Group ties, which have drawn attention from financial watchdogs and investigative platforms like FinTelegram.
  • Financial Irregularities: Reports from Intelligence Line suggest potential financial irregularities due to Monitox’s opaque ownership and business practices, though no specific evidence of fraud or mismanagement has been substantiated.
  • Data Protection: Monitox is registered with the ICO (ZB190422), indicating compliance with UK data protection laws. However, its use of third-party cookies and tracking technologies has raised privacy concerns among users.

The absence of formal legal actions does not fully mitigate concerns, as the company’s high-risk profile and lack of transparency suggest potential vulnerabilities.

Risk Assessment Table

Risk Type Factors Severity
Financial High-risk payment processing, ties to unregulated entities, opaque financials High
Reputational Association with Papel Group, lack of customer feedback, negative industry perception High
Regulatory Potential scrutiny due to Papel ties, risk of FCA restrictions Moderate
Operational Limited transparency, potential for service disruptions, data security risks Moderate
Legal No current lawsuits, but risk of future actions due to high-risk operations Low

Expert Opinion

Monitox Ltd presents a complex case in the fintech landscape. On one hand, its FCA authorization and focus on innovative payment solutions position it as a legitimate player in the financial services sector. The company’s emphasis on security, with features like 256-bit encryption and 2FA, aligns with industry standards for protecting client transactions. Its services, tailored to fintech entrepreneurs and neo-banks, address a growing market need for flexible payment solutions.

However, the company’s strengths are significantly undermined by its associations with the Papel Group and Ferit Samuray, whose track record raises serious red flags. The lack of transparency in ownership, coupled with whistleblower reports of ongoing ties to unregulated entities, suggests that Monitox may be operating in a regulatory gray area. The absence of customer feedback further erodes confidence, as reputable fintech firms typically have a visible track record of client experiences. The high-risk nature of its payment processing activities, combined with its opaque corporate structure, makes Monitox a risky partner for businesses seeking reliable and compliant financial services.

Pros:

  • FCA-authorized e-Money Institution, providing a degree of regulatory legitimacy.
  • Offers innovative payment solutions tailored to fintech and neo-bank clients.
  • Strong security claims, including 256-bit encryption and 2FA.

Cons:

  • Close ties to the controversial Papel Group, raising concerns about unregulated activities.
  • Lack of transparency in ownership and financial operations.
  • Limited public visibility and no verifiable customer feedback.
  • High-risk business model vulnerable to regulatory scrutiny.

Cautionary Advice: Businesses and individuals considering Monitox Ltd should proceed with extreme caution. Verify the company’s regulatory status directly with the FCA and conduct thorough due diligence on its business practices. Seek alternative providers with clearer track records and transparent operations. If engaging with Monitox, ensure robust contractual protections and monitor transactions closely for any irregularities.

Key Citations

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Recent Investigations

Dylan Sidoo

Dylan Sidoo

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert
Ryan Hurley

Ryan Hurley

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert
David Sidoo

David Sidoo

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert

Community Reviews and Comments

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login