Morteza Bandali

Key Points

• Subject: Morteza Bandali, a 22-year-old (born September 17, 1998) convicted of raping a schoolgirl in Enfield, UK, in 2016.

• Criminal Conviction: Sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment on September 22, 2020, at Southwark Crown Court for the 2016 rape, committed when he was 17.

• Absconding: Fled the UK on July 11, 2019, before his court hearing, returning later and arrested on February 5, 2020, in west London.

• Co-Defendants: Three other men, aged in their 20s, were sentenced in April 2020 for related offenses, totaling 45 years’ imprisonment.

• Serious Offense: The rape involved a vulnerable schoolgirl, highlighting significant public safety concerns.

• No Additional Records: No further lawsuits, financial issues, or consumer feedback are mentioned in the sources.

Overview

Morteza Bandali is an individual known through criminal proceedings for a serious sexual offense committed in Enfield, UK. Born on September 17, 1998, Bandali was 17 at the time of the offense in 2016 and 22 when sentenced in 2020. Residing at School Way, N12, London, he has no documented professional or business activities. His public profile is defined by his conviction for raping a schoolgirl and his attempt to evade justice by fleeing the UK. No information is provided about his occupation, education, or activities post-conviction, and he appears to be an individual offender without a commercial or public persona beyond this case.

Allegations and Concerns

• Rape Conviction: Bandali was convicted of raping a schoolgirl in Enfield in 2016, a grave offense that caused significant harm to a vulnerable victim. The crime’s severity is underscored by the nine-year sentence and the involvement of three co-defendants, suggesting a group-related offense.

• Absconding from Justice: Bandali fled the UK on July 11, 2019, four days before his first magistrates’ court hearing, indicating an attempt to avoid prosecution. His return and subsequent arrest in February 2020 further highlight his disregard for legal accountability.

• No Additional Complaints: The sources do not mention other allegations, lawsuits, or criminal activities beyond this case. However, the gravity of the offense and his flight risk raise significant red flags about his character and reliability.

Customer Feedback

• No Consumer Reviews Available: As an individual convicted of a crime, not a business or service provider, Bandali is not associated with consumer feedback platforms like Yelp or Google Reviews. The sources do not provide victim statements or public comments specific to the case.

• Victim Impact: The Parikiaki article notes the victim was a schoolgirl, implying significant trauma, but no direct quotes or victim feedback are included. The absence of detailed victim impact statements limits insight into the broader consequences of Bandali’s actions.

• Contextual Note: The lack of feedback aligns with Bandali’s non-commercial profile. Public sentiment, if any, would likely be negative due to the severity of the crime, but no specific reviews were found.

Risk Considerations

• Legal Risk: Bandali’s conviction for a serious sexual offense and his attempt to flee prosecution indicate a high risk of future legal issues, particularly if he violates parole or reoffends post-release.

• Reputational Risk: The publicized nature of his conviction, reported by Parikiaki and Unity News Network, severely damages Bandali’s reputation, likely limiting his social and professional opportunities in the UK.

• Public Safety Risk: As a convicted sex offender, Bandali poses a potential risk to public safety, especially to vulnerable individuals, as evidenced by the targeting of a schoolgirl.

• Financial Risk: No financial issues (e.g., debts, bankruptcy) are documented, but his incarceration and criminal record may restrict future employment, indirectly creating financial instability.

Business Relations and Associations

• Co-Defendants: Bandali was charged alongside three men in their 20s, sentenced in April 2020 to a combined 45 years for related offenses. Their identities and specific roles are not detailed, but this suggests Bandali was part of a group involved in the crime.

• No Business Affiliations: The sources do not indicate any business partnerships, professional associations, or organizational ties. Bandali appears to have acted as an individual within a criminal context, not a commercial one.

• Court Context: The case was processed at Southwark Crown Court, with no attorneys or other associates named, limiting further insight into his network.

Legal and Financial Concerns

• Rape Conviction: Bandali was sentenced on September 22, 2020, to nine years’ imprisonment for the 2016 rape of a schoolgirl. He was arrested in May 2017, charged on June 17, 2019, and convicted after his return from absconding.

• Absconding Charge: His flight from the UK on July 11, 2019, and arrest on February 5, 2020, for failing to appear in court add to his legal concerns, though specific penalties for absconding are not detailed beyond the rape sentence.

• No Financial Concerns: No records of unpaid debts, bankruptcy, or financial disputes are mentioned in the sources.

• Comparative Context: The combined 45-year sentence for co-defendants suggests a serious, coordinated offense, but Bandali’s individual sentence reflects his specific role, potentially mitigated by his age (17) at the time of the crime.

Risk Assessment Table

Notes: “High” severity for legal, reputational, and public safety risks reflects the gravity of the offense and public record. “Medium” financial risk accounts for potential economic challenges post-incarceration.

Expert Opinion

Analytical Summary

Morteza Bandali’s public profile is defined by a 2016 rape conviction in Enfield, for which he was sentenced to nine years in prison in 2020. His attempt to evade justice by fleeing the UK underscores a lack of accountability, amplifying concerns about his trustworthiness and potential for future misconduct. The involvement of three co-defendants suggests a group dynamic, but Bandali’s specific role and current status remain unclear due to limited post-conviction data. The absence of financial or additional legal issues is notable, but his criminal history poses significant risks to public safety and personal reputation.

Pros

• No evidence of additional crimes or financial misconduct beyond the 2016 offense.

• Youth at the time of the offense (17) may have influenced sentencing leniency.

Cons

• Conviction for a serious sexual offense against a vulnerable victim indicates predatory behavior.

• Absconding from justice demonstrates disregard for legal consequences.

• Publicized conviction likely results in long-term social and professional exclusion.

Cautionary Advice

Individuals, employers, or community members should exercise extreme caution regarding any interaction with Bandali due to his history of serious sexual violence and flight risk. Verify his current status through UK court or parole records, as he may be eligible for release around 2025, given his nine-year sentence starting in 2020. Background checks are essential for any professional or personal engagement, and he should be considered a high-risk individual for roles involving vulnerable populations. Public safety measures, such as Sexual Harm Prevention Orders, may apply post-release, and authorities should be consulted for updates.

Key Citations

• Parikiaki: “Man who absconded after he raped schoolgirl in Enfield jailed,” published September 24, 2020, detailing Bandali’s conviction and absconding.

• Unity News Network: “Man jailed after he raped a schoolgirl in Enfield and fled the United Kingdom,” published September 24, 2020, providing additional case details.

• No consumer reviews, financial databases, or additional sources were identified due to Bandali’s lack of a public or commercial profile.