NordPay

Key Points

• NordPay is implicated in a cybercrime investigation for allegedly filing fraudulent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices to suppress negative online content, potentially involving impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

• The entity’s identity is unclear, with possible ties to NordPay Financial (nordpay.eu) or NORDPAY LTD, a dissolved UK company, but no definitive connection to Nord Security or its services.

• Allegations suggest NordPay or associated parties use a “back-dated article” technique to falsely claim copyright ownership, targeting adverse news or reviews.

• No direct customer feedback is available specific to the NordPay entity in the cybercrime context, and no lawsuits or financial distress are confirmed.

• Risks include reputational damage, legal exposure, and potential confusion with legitimate financial services like NordPay Financial.

Overview

NordPay appears in a cybercrime investigation  but lacks a clear corporate identity in the provided context. It may relate to:

• NordPay Financial (nordpay.eu): A Lithuania-based payment processing service offering fraud detection and financial intermediation, regulated by the Bank of Lithuania.

• NORDPAY LTD: A UK company (registered 2007, dissolved 2016) involved in financial intermediation, per Companies House records.

• No Connection to Nord Security: Despite similar branding, there is no evidence linking NordPay to Nord Security (nordsecurity.com), which operates NordVPN, NordProtect, and NordLayer.

The  investigation does not confirm NordPay’s operational details but alleges it, or an entity using its name, engages in fraudulent DMCA takedown schemes to remove critical online content. Without further clarification, NordPay is treated as a nebulous entity potentially tied to financial services or reputation management.

Allegations and Concerns

• Fraudulent DMCA Takedown Notices:Alleges that NordPay, or an associated “Online Reputation Management” agency, submits fake DMCA notices to Google, using back-dated articles to claim ownership over legitimate content. This aims to suppress negative reviews or news, potentially constituting:

  • Impersonation: Filing notices under false pretenses.

  • Fraud: Misrepresenting copyright ownership.

  • Perjury: Submitting false claims under oath.

• Unclear Identity: The investigation does not confirm whether NordPay is a standalone entity, a front, or linked to NordPay Financial or another organization, raising red flags about its legitimacy.

• Potential Organized Crime: The sophisticated nature of the DMCA scheme suggests possible ties to broader cybercrime networks, though no evidence confirms this.

• Reputational Manipulation: The intent to conceal adverse information implies NordPay may be protecting itself or a client from scrutiny, undermining transparency.

Customer Feedback

No direct consumer reviews are available for the NordPay entity implicated in the cybercrime investigation, as it is not clearly defined as a business with public-facing services. However:

• NordPay Financial (nordpay.eu): General feedback on payment processors like NordPay Financial praises their fraud detection tools, with a 2018 nordpay.eu page stating, “Our Fraud detection tool protects good business while identifying risky behaviour.” No specific user quotes or negative reviews are cited in the context of the allegations.

• Investigation Context: The  report implies negative sentiment by noting attempts to “remove adverse news,” suggesting public or media criticism exists but is being suppressed. No specific examples or quotes are provided.

• Nord Security Products: Reviews for Nord Security’s services (e.g., NordVPN, NordProtect) are positive, with nordsecurity.com claiming, “Our security tools have earned praise from respected experts and tech outlets,” but these are unrelated to NordPay’s allegations.

Risk Considerations

• Reputational Risk: The cybercrime allegations severely damage NordPay’s credibility, especially if linked to NordPay Financial, a regulated entity. Confusion with Nord Security’s reputable brands could amplify negative perceptions.

• Legal Risk: Fraudulent DMCA notices could lead to civil or criminal penalties for fraud, impersonation, or perjury, depending on jurisdiction. Ongoing investigations  and affiliates (e.g., Harvard, Lumen, FakeDMCA.com) increase exposure.

• Financial Risk: No direct financial losses are reported, but legal costs or fines could arise if allegations are substantiated. For NordPay Financial, regulatory scrutiny from the Bank of Lithuania is possible if implicated.

• Operational Risk: The unclear identity of NordPay suggests it may be a shell or front, posing risks to partners or clients who engage with it unknowingly.

Business Relations and Associations

• Possible Entities:

  • NordPay Financial (nordpay.eu): A Lithuanian payment processor regulated by the Bank of Lithuania, offering fraud detection and payment solutions. No direct link to the allegations is confirmed.

  • NORDPAY LTD: A dissolved UK company (2007–2016) with a registered office in London, involved in financial intermediation. Its dissolution predates the investigation, making involvement unlikely but not impossible.

• Media Entities: The  investigation mentions Cooper Media Corp., Bhosle Media Corp., and Falcon Media Inc., potentially tied to the DMCA scheme as fronts or reputation management firms. Their roles are unclear.

• No Nord Security Link: Nord Security (NordVPN, NordProtect) is explicitly unrelated, despite branding similarities, per nordsecurity.com and web sources.

• Regulatory Oversight: If NordPay is NordPay Financial, it answers to the Bank of Lithuania, which could investigate if allegations affect its operations.

• No Key Individuals Named: The investigation does not identify specific executives or employees tied to NordPay’s alleged actions.

Legal and Financial Concerns

• Cybercrime Investigation:  with researchers from Harvard, Lumen, and FakeDMCA.com, is probing the DMCA fraud allegations. No lawsuits or charges are confirmed, but the investigation suggests potential legal exposure.

• No Lawsuits or Debts: No records of lawsuits, unpaid debts, or bankruptcy are linked to NordPay, NordPay Financial, or NORDPAY LTD in the provided sources.

• Dissolution of NORDPAY LTD: Per Companies House, NORDPAY LTD was dissolved in January 2016, with last accounts filed for October 2015, indicating no ongoing financial distress at the time.

• Regulatory Compliance: NordPay Financial’s fraud prevention tools (nordpay.eu, 2018) align with financial regulations, but the allegations could prompt scrutiny from the Bank of Lithuania or EU authorities.

Risk Assessment Table

Expert Opinion

The NordPay case is murky, defined by serious cybercrime allegations but hampered by an ambiguous identity. The fraudulent DMCA notices suggest a deliberate effort to manipulate online narratives, pointing to either a rogue entity or a reputation management scheme gone awry. If NordPay is linked to NordPay Financial, a regulated Lithuanian firm, the allegations threaten its legitimacy and could invite regulatory action. However, the lack of concrete ties to an operational business—and the dissolution of NORDPAY LTD—raises the possibility that NordPay is a front or misidentified entity. The absence of customer feedback or financial distress limits immediate concerns, but the ongoing investigation keeps risks alive.

Pros:

• NordPay Financial (if related) offers legitimate payment processing with fraud detection, per nordpay.eu.

• No confirmed lawsuits or financial collapse tied to the entity.

• Nord Security’s unrelated services maintain strong reputations, avoiding spillover.

Cons:

• Cybercrime allegations (DMCA fraud) suggest unethical or illegal conduct.

• Unclear identity fuels distrust and complicates accountability.

• Potential regulatory or legal fallout if investigations confirm wrongdoing.

Cautionary Advice: Avoid engaging with any entity branded as NordPay until its identity and involvement in the DMCA scheme are clarified. Businesses or consumers using NordPay Financial’s services should verify its regulatory status with the Bank of Lithuania and monitor updates . Stakeholders should also distinguish NordPay from Nord Security to avoid misattribution. Independent audits of online content linked to NordPay are advisable to detect manipulation.

Key Citations

• Cybercriminal.com Investigation: https://cybercriminal.com/investigation/nordpay