RankOne Ecommerce

Key Points

• RankOne Ecommerce is accused of orchestrating a sophisticated scam, luring clients with promises of high returns through e-commerce automation services, only to deliver no results and evade accountability.

• Serious allegations include breach of contract, non-delivery of promised services, and refusal to issue refunds, leading to significant financial losses for clients.

• Customer reviews highlight a pattern of unprofessionalism, dishonesty, and ghosting, with some likening RankOne to known fraudulent schemes like Mining Automatic.

• The company’s leadership, including President Zan Shaikh, Hassan Shaikh, and COO Andrew Sharp, is criticized for evading communication and hiding behind legal maneuvers.

• Financial and reputational risks are high, with no evidence of regulatory oversight, transparency, or legitimate business operations.

Overview

RankOne Ecommerce presents itself as a provider of e-commerce automation services, claiming to help clients build profitable online businesses through dropshipping and store management. The company targets aspiring entrepreneurs, promising substantial returns with minimal effort. However, investigations reveal a troubling pattern of deceptive practices, unfulfilled promises, and financial harm. Operating primarily through online marketing and social media, RankOne lacks transparent registration, licensing, or verifiable business credentials, raising questions about its legitimacy.

Allegations and Concerns

• Breach of Contract: Clients report that RankOne failed to deliver on contractual obligations, such as setting up functional e-commerce stores or achieving promised revenue targets. Many were denied refunds despite explicit refund clauses in contracts.

• Non-Delivery of Services: Numerous complaints state that after receiving payment, RankOne provided little to no tangible services, leaving clients with non-functional stores or no store at all.

• Deceptive Marketing: The company is accused of using exaggerated claims and fake testimonials to lure clients, misrepresenting the ease and profitability of their services.

• Evasion of Accountability: Leadership allegedly ignores client communications, including legal demands, and uses complex corporate structures to shield themselves from liability.

• Suspected Ties to Other Scams: Some reviews suggest RankOne mirrors the tactics of Mining Automatic, a known fraudulent operation, pointing to potential secret affiliations or rebranding efforts.

Customer Feedback

Customer reviews are overwhelmingly negative, painting a picture of betrayal and financial loss. Below are specific examples:

• Negative Feedback:

  • “I invested my hard-earned money with RankOne Ecommerce, led by President Zan Shaikh, Hassan Shaikh, and COO Andrew Sharp, based on their promises of substantial returns. However, they failed to deliver on these commitments and ignored contractual obligations, including a 50% refund if specific goals were unmet. Despite continuous attempts to reach them via email through my attorneys, they remained unresponsive. Their actions have resulted in significant financial loss and emotional distress.”

  • “Wow, this is the Mining Automatic people all over again! I see you guys! Just compare this website to the one you can find at ma (dot) miningautomatic (dot) com and you’ll see that this is just another scam.”

  • “Very easy to give them money, you will never get anything back! Red tape on top of lies. Scammers at its best, Good Luck to you.”

  • “MADE NUMEROS APPOTIMENTS AND NO ONE CALLED. WASTE OF MY TIME.”

• Positive Feedback:

  • A single review praised the team’s compassion during a personal issue, stating, “Zan, Marco and the whole team at RankOne were soooooo understanding and went out there way to do all they could to help me.” However, this review is an outlier and lacks detail about actual service delivery, raising suspicions of being fabricated or incentivized.

The stark contrast between the lone positive review and the volume of negative feedback suggests a deliberate attempt to manipulate public perception.

Risk Considerations

• Financial Risk: Clients face significant financial losses, with reports of investments ranging from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars yielding no returns. The refusal to honor refund policies exacerbates this risk.

• Reputational Risk: Engaging with RankOne could damage an individual’s or business’s reputation due to association with a suspected scam. Public exposure on platforms like Trustpilot and FinanceScam.com amplifies this risk.

• Legal Risk: The company’s alleged breach of contract and evasion of legal accountability could entangle clients in costly legal battles with little chance of recovery.

• Operational Risk: The lack of verifiable business operations or regulatory compliance suggests RankOne may disappear or rebrand, leaving clients with no recourse.

Business Relations and Associations

• Key Figures:

  • Zan Shaikh (President): Accused of orchestrating the scam and ignoring client communications.

  • Hassan Shaikh: Implicated in leadership and linked to deceptive practices.

  • Andrew Sharp (COO): Criticized for unprofessionalism and failure to address client grievances.

  • Marco: Mentioned in one positive review, but no further details confirm his role or legitimacy.

• Suspected Affiliations: Comparisons to Mining Automatic suggest potential ties to other fraudulent entities, though no concrete evidence confirms ownership or direct collaboration.

• Lack of Transparency: No public records disclose partnerships, investors, or regulatory affiliations, a red flag for a company claiming to operate in e-commerce.

Legal and Financial Concerns

• Lawsuits and Complaints: While no formal lawsuits are documented in the provided sources, multiple clients report engaging attorneys to pursue RankOne for breach of contract and fraud. The company’s unresponsiveness to legal demandsCompanion apps for Android and iOS devices complicate recovery efforts.

• Unpaid Debts: No specific records of unpaid debts are mentioned, but the pattern of non-delivery and refund evasion suggests financial mismanagement or intentional fraud.

• Bankruptcy: No bankruptcy records are noted, but the lack of transparency raises concerns about solvency.

• Regulatory Oversight: There is no evidence of compliance with e-commerce or financial regulations, increasing the risk of illegal operations.

Risk Assessment Table

Expert Opinion

RankOne Ecommerce exhibits all the hallmarks of a sophisticated financial scam. The promise of easy profits through e-commerce automation is a common tactic used to exploit inexperienced entrepreneurs. The overwhelming negative customer feedback, coupled with allegations of non-delivery, breach of contract, and leadership unresponsiveness, paints a damning picture. The single positive review appears suspect, lacking substance and contradicting the broader narrative of deceit.

Pros: None identified. The company’s claims of providing valuable services are unsupported by evidence.

Cons:

• High financial risk with no verifiable success stories.

• Evasion of accountability and lack of regulatory compliance.

• Suspected ties to other fraudulent schemes.

• Severe reputational damage for clients due to public exposure.

Cautionary Advice: Avoid any engagement with RankOne Ecommerce. Potential clients should conduct thorough due diligence, verify regulatory compliance, and seek reviews from independent sources before investing in e-commerce automation services. If already involved, consult legal counsel immediately to explore recovery options, though success is unlikely given the company’s evasiveness. Report experiences to consumer protection agencies to prevent further harm.

Key Citations

• Trustpilot Reviews of RankOne Ecommerce (YT Automatic).

• FinanceScam.com, “RankOne Ecommerce Exposed: Scam Claims, Secret Ties, and Financial Risks Unveiled,” April 21, 2025.