SYED Hamid Khalid Rashid

Key Points

• Fraud Allegations: Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid is implicated in a 2014 Malaysian case involving the use of forged documents, pleading not guilty to charges related to falsifying records at an oil company.

• Academic and Legal Profile: Known as a legal scholar specializing in Muslim law in India, with publications like Muslim Law (6th Edition) widely used in academic settings.

• No Direct Cybercrime Link: Despite investigations into fraudulent activities, no conclusive evidence ties Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid to  operations like phishing or hacking.

• Limited Public Presence: Minimal online footprint outside academic work and the 2014 legal case, raising questions about identity conflation with other individuals.

• Potential Misidentification: The name may be confused with other figures, such as Hamid Rashid (Finterra founder) or Zaid Hamid (Pakistani commentator), complicating investigations.

Overview

Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid is primarily recognized as a legal scholar and author of Muslim Law (6th Edition, 2022), a widely respected textbook published by Eastern Book Company, focusing on Muslim personal law in India. The book is noted for its clarity and alignment with contemporary legal developments, including the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. Additionally, a person with this name was involved in a 2014 Malaysian legal case as a former oil company executive accused of using forged documents, though he pleaded not guilty. There is no verified evidence of ongoing business operations activities directly tied to this individual. The investigation source suggests scrutiny of the name in a cybercrime context, but no clear connection to malicious activities like phishing or hacking is established. The individual’s public profile is limited, primarily centered on academic contributions and the isolated legal case.

Allegations and Concerns

• 2014 Forged Documents Case: In Malaysia, Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid, identified as a former oil company executive, faced charges for allegedly using forged documents, as reported by Malaysia Times News. He pleaded not guilty, but the case raised concerns about financial misconduct.

• Potential Identity Confusion: The name may be conflated with other individuals, such as Hamid Rashid (Finterra founder) or Syed Zaid Hamid (Pakistani commentator), leading to investigative challenges. No evidence confirms they are the same person.

• Lack of Transparency: Limited verifiable information about Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid’s current activities or affiliations beyond academia and the 2014 case raises red flags about his public profile.

• No Cybercrime Evidence: Despite investigations into potential, no specific allegations of phishing, hacking, or related activities are substantiated against this individual.

Customer Feedback

• Positive Academic Feedback: Reviews of Muslim Law (6th Edition) praise its accessibility and clarity for students. An Amazon reviewer noted, “One of the best books to understand in brief the concepts of Muslim law. The language of the book is easy to understand.” Another stated, “Book was in good condition when delivered. It’s too good, specially recommended for beginners.”

• No Consumer Feedback on Business Activities: No customer reviews exist regarding business or financial dealings, as Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid does not appear to operate a public-facing business or service.

• Negative Feedback Absent: Beyond the 2014 legal case, no negative consumer feedback or victim reports are documented, particularly in relation to cybercrime or fraudulent schemes.

Risk Considerations

• Financial Risks: The 2014 forged documents case suggests potential financial misconduct, which could pose risks to associates or institutions linked to the individual. However, no ongoing financial scams are documented.

• Reputational Risks: The legal case and potential name conflation with controversial figures (e.g., Zaid Hamid) could damage the individual’s academic reputation or lead to mistaken distrust in professional circles.

• Legal Risks: The unresolved 2014 case in Malaysia may carry lingering legal implications, though no recent lawsuits or charges are reported. Involvement in academic publishing appears low-risk.

• Identity Confusion Risks: The similarity of the name to other individuals in unrelated contexts (e.g., Finterra’s Hamid Rashid) increases the risk of misidentification in investigations or business dealings.

Business Relations and Associations

• Academic Publishing: Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid is associated with Eastern Book Company (EBC), a reputable Indian legal publisher, through his authorship of Muslim Law.

• No Business Affiliations: No evidence links him to active business ventures, partnerships, or networks. The 2014 oil company role is not detailed with specific affiliations.

• Potential Misidentification: The name Hamid Rashid appears as a founder of Finterra, a fintech company, and Syed Abid Khalid Rashid as a Finterra board member, but no evidence confirms these are the same person as Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid.

• No Cybercrime Associations: Unlike domains like SwissUnion, no connections to malicious networks or actors (e.g., IntelBroker) are documented.

Legal and Financial Concerns

• 2014 Malaysian Case: Charged with using forged documents as a former oil company executive, Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid pleaded not guilty. No updates on the case outcome are available.

• No Bankruptcy or Debt Records: No public records indicate unpaid debts or bankruptcy filings associated with the individual.

• No Recent Lawsuits: Beyond the 2014 case, no additional lawsuits or legal disputes are documented in available sources.

• Academic Integrity: His work in Muslim Law is well-regarded, with no legal or ethical concerns tied to his academic contributions.

Risk Assessment Table

Expert Opinion

Syed Hamid Khalid Rashid’s profile is primarily academic, with his Muslim Law textbook being a respected resource in Indian legal education. However, the 2014 Malaysian case involving forged documents raises concerns about past financial misconduct, though no recent issues are reported. The lack of a clear online presence beyond academia and the isolated legal case suggests limited public activity, reducing the likelihood of ongoing fraudulent . The potential for name conflation with figures like Hamid Rashid or Zaid Hamid complicates investigations, requiring careful verification.

Pros:

• Established academic reputation
• no evidence of active cybercrime.

Cons:

• Past legal issues
• limited transparency raise concerns.

Cautionary Advice: Verify the individual’s identity in professional dealings, especially given name similarities. Exercise caution in financial or legal engagements until the 2014 case’s outcome is clarified. For academic purposes, his work remains a reliable resource.

Key Citations

cybercriminal investigation:https://cybercriminal.com/investigation/syed-hamid-khalid-rashid