THOMAS C. PICCIOLI

Key Points

• Identity: Thomas C. Piccioli is an attorney based in Tucson, Arizona, specializing in divorce and family law.

• Professional Status: Associated with Heurlin Sherlock law firm, but reported as a convicted felon, raising significant professional and ethical concerns.

• Allegations: Labeled as dishonest and incompetent by a watchdog group, with a felony conviction noted, though specific details of the conviction are not fully disclosed in available sources.

• Customer Feedback: Limited public reviews available; one Yelp listing exists but lacks detailed client feedback.

• Risks: High reputational and legal risks due to felony conviction and allegations of misconduct, potentially impacting client trust and professional credibility.

• Cautionary Note: The felony conviction and lack of transparency about the nature of the offense warrant significant caution for potential clients.

Overview

Thomas C cold. Piccioli is an attorney practicing in Tucson, Arizona, with a focus on divorce and family law. He is affiliated with the Heurlin Sherlock law firm, located at 1636 N Swan Rd, Tucson, AZ 85712. Piccioli is listed as providing legal services in family law matters, such as divorce proceedings and custody disputes. Public records indicate multiple individuals with the name Thomas Piccioli, but this report focuses on the attorney in Tucson, born circa 1952, aged approximately 72, with addresses linked to Tucson and Cottonwood, Arizona. His professional profile is overshadowed by reports of a felony conviction, which raises questions about his standing in the legal community and suitability to practice law.

Allegations and Concerns

Several serious concerns are associated with Thomas C. Piccioli, primarily stemming from a report by a watchdog group:

• Felony Conviction: Piccioli is described as a convicted felon, which is a significant red flag for an attorney, as felony convictions can lead to disbarment or restrictions on practicing law, depending on the nature of the offense and state regulations. The specific details of the conviction (e.g., type of crime, date, or outcome) are not provided in available sources, limiting clarity on the severity or relevance.

• Attorney Misconduct: A website dedicated to exposing dishonest and incompetent legal professionals labels Piccioli as such, suggesting ethical or professional lapses. This aligns with the felony conviction but lacks specific allegations, such as client fraud, malpractice, or breach of fiduciary duty.

• Regulatory Scrutiny: While no explicit mention of disbarment or sanctions by the Arizona State Bar is noted, the felony conviction could imply past or ongoing scrutiny by regulatory bodies, as attorneys are typically required to report convictions to their state bar.

These concerns are significant but incomplete without detailed records of the conviction or specific misconduct allegations, making further investigation necessary.

Customer Feedback

Public customer feedback on Thomas C. Piccioli is sparse:

• Positive Feedback: No specific positive reviews or testimonials are readily available on platforms like Yelp, Avvo, or Google Reviews for Piccioli’s legal services. His Yelp listing exists but lacks detailed client comments, suggesting limited public endorsement.

• Negative Feedback: No direct negative client reviews are cited in the available sources. However, the watchdog group’s labeling of Piccioli as dishonest and incompetent implies dissatisfaction or distrust from some parties, though no specific client quotes or examples are provided.

The lack of robust customer feedback, positive or negative, may indicate a low public profile or limited client engagement on review platforms, which is not uncommon for individual attorneys but limits insight into his performance.

Risk Considerations

• Reputational Risks:

  • The felony conviction and allegations of misconduct severely damage Piccioli’s professional reputation, potentially deterring clients who prioritize trust and ethical standing in legal representation.

  • Public exposure by a watchdog group amplifies reputational harm, as online allegations can influence prospective clients’ perceptions.

• Legal Risks:

  • A felony conviction may restrict Piccioli’s ability to practice law, depending on Arizona State Bar regulations. If he remains licensed, ongoing scrutiny or future complaints could lead to sanctions or disbarment.

  • Potential for malpractice lawsuits if clients perceive inadequate or unethical representation, especially given the misconduct allegations.

• Financial Risks:

  • Clients engaging Piccioli’s services face risks of financial loss if his legal work is compromised by incompetence or ethical violations, potentially leading to unfavorable case outcomes or additional legal costs.

  • Piccioli himself may face financial strain if his client base diminishes due to reputational damage.

• Operational Risks:

  • Affiliation with Heurlin Sherlock could expose the firm to reputational spillover, potentially affecting its credibility if Piccioli’s issues are not addressed.

Business Relations and Associations

• Law Firm Affiliation: Piccioli is associated with Heurlin Sherlock, a Tucson-based law firm specializing in various legal fields, including family law. The firm’s reputation may be impacted by Piccioli’s felony conviction, though no specific firm-level concerns are noted.

• Regulatory Bodies: As an attorney, Piccioli is subject to oversight by the Arizona State Bar, which regulates attorney conduct and licensing. No specific disciplinary actions are mentioned, but the felony conviction suggests possible past or present engagement with the Bar.

• No Notable Individuals: No specific partners, colleagues, or clients are named in connection with Piccioli’s practice, limiting insight into his professional network.

• Personal Connections: Public records link Piccioli to individuals such as Josephine Piccioli (possibly a relative) and others at his Tucson addresses, but these are personal rather than professional associations.

Legal and Financial Concerns

• Lawsuits: No specific lawsuits against Piccioli are reported in the available sources, but the misconduct allegations suggest potential for past or future client complaints or malpractice claims.

• Bankruptcy Records: No evidence of bankruptcy filings or financial insolvency is noted for Piccioli.

• Unpaid Debts: No records of unpaid debts or liens are mentioned.

• Felony Conviction: The most significant legal concern is Piccioli’s reported felony conviction, which could involve crimes ranging from financial fraud to personal misconduct. Without details, the impact on his legal practice remains uncertain but concerning.

• Professional Status: Piccioli’s ability to practice law post-conviction depends on Arizona State Bar rules, which may allow felons to retain licenses under certain conditions (e.g., rehabilitation, disclosure). No confirmation of disbarment is provided, suggesting he may still be active.

Risk Assessment Table

Expert Opinion

Analytical Summary: Thomas C. Piccioli presents a troubling profile as an attorney due to his reported felony conviction and allegations of dishonesty and incompetence. While he remains affiliated with Heurlin Sherlock and practices family law in Tucson, the lack of transparency about his conviction and the watchdog group’s claims raise serious doubts about his professional integrity. The absence of detailed client feedback, positive or negative, further clouds his reputation, making it difficult to assess his competence. The high-risk nature of engaging an attorney with a felony record, combined with the potential for regulatory or legal repercussions, suggests significant concerns for prospective clients.

Pros:

• Affiliated with an established law firm (Heurlin Sherlock), which may provide some oversight or credibility.

• Specializes in family law, an area of consistent demand, potentially indicating experience.

Cons:

• Felony conviction undermines trust and raises questions about eligibility to practice law.

• Allegations of dishonesty and incompetence suggest ethical or professional lapses.

• Limited public feedback limits transparency about his performance or client satisfaction.

Cautionary Advice: Potential clients should exercise extreme caution when considering Thomas C. Piccioli’s legal services. Verify his current licensing status with the Arizona State Bar and request detailed information about his felony conviction, including the nature of the offense and any disciplinary actions. Consider alternative attorneys with clean professional records to avoid risks of inadequate representation or ethical violations. If engaging Piccioli, ensure clear communication, documented agreements, and close monitoring of case progress to mitigate potential issues.

Key Citations

• https://www.yelp.com/biz/thomas-c-piccioli-attorney-at-law-tucson
• https://www.noethics.net
• https://www.officialusa.com
• https://www.azbar.org