CyberCriminal.com
Timothy Hornibrook

Timothy Hornibrook

Average Ratings
  • 2.3

Based on 8 reviews

1.3

Trust Score

LOW

Trust Index

Last Updated - 2025-05-23
Timothy Hornibrook
Get everything we know about Timothy Hornibrook in one downloadble PDF document
For Law Enforcement
If you are a law enforcement agent who is authorized to gather evidence in connection with an official investigation, you may request this record for free

Key Points

  • Identity: Timothy Hornibrook is a former Australian fund manager, previously a director at a major financial institution, specializing in agricultural investments.

  • Legal Issues: Banned for six years in 2016 by a regulatory authority for using a fake email address to obtain confidential data from a rival fund.

  • Allegations: Engaged in deceptive conduct by posing as a fictitious family office to extract sensitive commercial information, raising ethical concerns.

  • Customer Feedback: No direct customer reviews are available, limiting insight into his professional reputation.

  • Risks: Significant reputational and legal risks due to the regulatory ban, potential financial risks for partners or clients, and operational risks for associated businesses.

  • Current Status: Reportedly based in Auckland, New Zealand, with a professional profile indicating ongoing activity, though specifics are unclear.

Overview

Timothy Hornibrook, formerly of Clovelly, New South Wales, Australia, is a financial professional with expertise in agricultural investments. He served as a director and head of agricultural funds management at a prominent financial institution, analyzing global agricultural commodities and focusing on risk/reward characteristics for institutional investments. Hornibrook guided funds targeting Australian cattle and sheep production and broader food and feed sectors, leveraging global protein consumption trends. He left the institution in 2014 and reportedly relocated to Auckland, New Zealand, where his professional profile lists him as an agricultural investment professional. His career was significantly impacted by a 2016 regulatory ban for unethical conduct, affecting his professional standing.

Allegations and Concerns

Serious allegations are associated with Hornibrook, stemming from his actions at his former employer:

  • Deceptive Conduct: In late 2011, Hornibrook and his sales team used a fake email address from a fictitious family office to deceive a rival agricultural fund into providing sensitive commercial information, including financial, performance, and organizational data. The ploy, initiated from a London office, was uncovered by a financial publication in 2014, prompting a regulatory investigation.

  • Regulatory Ban: In 2016, a financial authority banned Hornibrook from providing financial services for six years, citing his deceptive conduct as a breach of ethical standards. The ban reflects a significant finding of misconduct, though no criminal charges were reported.

  • No Additional Complaints: Beyond this case, no further lawsuits, client complaints, or allegations are noted. The incident appears isolated but remains a major ethical concern.

Customer Feedback

No direct customer or client feedback is available:

  • Positive Feedback: No public reviews or testimonials praise Hornibrook’s services. His professional profile lists over 500 connections, but no endorsements or recommendations are detailed.

  • Negative Feedback: No negative reviews or client complaints are cited, possibly due to his role in institutional investments, which involves fewer direct client interactions, or a low profile post-ban.

The absence of feedback limits insight into his performance, likely reflecting the nature of his work or intentional obscurity following the ban.

Risk Considerations

  • Reputational Risks:

    • The regulatory ban and public reporting of deceptive conduct severely damage Hornibrook’s credibility, likely deterring clients or partners who prioritize ethical conduct.

    • His association with a prominent financial institution amplifies scrutiny of his actions, even years later.

  • Legal Risks:

    • Although the ban (2016–2022) has expired, Hornibrook’s history of regulatory violation increases the risk of future scrutiny if he re-enters financial services.

    • Potential for civil lawsuits from the affected rival fund, though no such actions are reported.

  • Financial Risks:

    • Partners or clients engaging with Hornibrook risk financial loss if his ethics or judgment remain questionable, particularly in high-stakes agricultural investments.

    • The ban may have impacted his financial stability, potentially affecting professional commitments.

  • Operational Risks:

    • Businesses associated with Hornibrook face reputational spillover, as seen with his former employer’s need to replace leadership and staff post-incident.

    • Uncertainty about his current activities increases risks for collaborators.

Business Relations and Associations

  • Former Employer: Hornibrook was a director and head of agricultural funds management at a major financial institution until 2014, when he and involved staff left following the email ploy scandal. The institution conducted an internal investigation and replaced the business’s leadership.

  • Unnamed Rival Fund: The victim of Hornibrook’s deceptive email was a competitor in the agricultural investment sector, though its identity is not disclosed.

  • Sales Team: Hornibrook collaborated with his sales team in the fake email scheme, though their identities and consequences are unspecified.

  • Current Associations: Hornibrook’s professional profile indicates he is based in Auckland, New Zealand, but no specific employers or partners are listed post-2014. Other profiles mention a “Tim Hornibrook” as Director at a solutions company in Ashford, UK, and Executive Director at a company in Telangana, India, but it’s unclear if these are the same individual.

Legal and Financial Concerns

  • Lawsuits: No civil lawsuits or client complaints are reported beyond the regulatory ban. Hornibrook had the right to appeal the ban to an administrative tribunal, but no appeal outcome is noted.

  • Bankruptcy Records: No evidence of personal bankruptcy filings is mentioned.

  • Unpaid Debts: No records of unpaid debts or liens are noted.

  • Regulatory Ban: The six-year ban (2016–2022) from providing financial services is the primary legal concern, resulting from deceptive conduct. The ban prohibited Hornibrook from working in Australia’s financial services industry during that period, though he may have resumed activities since its expiration.

  • No Criminal Charges: The regulatory action was not criminal, indicating no jail time or fines beyond the ban.

Risk Assessment Table

Risk Type

Risk Factors

Severity

Reputational

Regulatory ban; public reporting of deceptive conduct; institutional association

High

Legal

Past regulatory violation; potential future scrutiny; possible civil lawsuits

Moderate

Financial

Risk of loss for partners/clients; potential personal financial impact from ban

Moderate

Operational

Reputational spillover to associated businesses; uncertainty about current role

Moderate

Expert Opinion

Analytical Summary: Timothy Hornibrook’s professional profile is overshadowed by a significant ethical lapse, resulting in a six-year regulatory ban for deceptive conduct. His expertise in agricultural investments and former role at a major financial institution suggest capability, but the 2011 fake email ploy undermines trust in his judgment. The absence of customer feedback, positive or negative, leaves his current competence unclear, while his relocation to New Zealand and vague professional status add uncertainty. The expired ban allows him to potentially resume financial activities, but his history poses ongoing risks for partners or clients. The incident appears isolated, with no further allegations, but its severity warrants caution.

Pros:

  • Extensive experience in agricultural investments, with a track record at a reputable institution.

  • No additional allegations or lawsuits beyond the 2011 incident, suggesting a limited scope of misconduct.

Cons:

  • Regulatory ban for deceptive conduct severely damages credibility and raises ethical concerns.

  • Lack of customer feedback limits transparency about current performance or reliability.

  • Uncertainty about current professional activities increases risks for engagement.

Cautionary Advice: Individuals or businesses considering engagement with Hornibrook should exercise significant caution. Verify his current professional status and any regulatory restrictions in relevant jurisdictions, particularly if he is involved in financial services. Request detailed references and evidence of post-ban activities to assess his reliability. Given the reputational and legal risks, explore alternative professionals with clean records to avoid potential financial or ethical issues. If engaging Hornibrook, ensure transparent agreements and monitor activities closely to mitigate risks.

Key Citations

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Recent Investigations

Patrick Vestner

Patrick Vestner

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert
Sam Mustafa

Sam Mustafa

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert
Hans Raj Shiv

Hans Raj Shiv

Low Trust Index

View Threat Alert

Community Reviews and Comments

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login