Able App
We are investigating Able App for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Able App
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 19 Aug 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 1841/A/2025
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 18 Mar 2025
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Able App over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Able App - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Able App, a financial services app designed to help users manage loans and credit, has faced a series of serious allegations and red flags that have tarnished its reputation. These issues range from unethical business practices to potential legal violations, raising concerns about the company’s integrity and operations. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news surrounding Able, along with an analysis of how these stories harm its reputation and why the company might seek to suppress them, even through illicit means.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
1.Misleading Marketing Practices
Able has been accused of misleading users about its services, particularly regarding interest rates and repayment terms. Customers have reported hidden fees and unexpected charges, leading to accusations of deceptive advertising. Such practices erode trust and could lead to regulatory scrutiny.
2.Data Privacy Concerns
Multiple users have raised concerns about Able’s handling of personal and financial data. Reports suggest the app may share sensitive information with third parties without explicit consent, violating privacy norms and potentially breaching data protection laws like GDPR or CCPA.
3.Aggressive Debt Collection Tactics
Able has been criticized for employing aggressive and unethical debt collection practices. Users have reported harassment, including frequent calls and threats, which could violate fair debt collection laws and damage the company’s public image.
4.Lack of Transparency in Loan Terms
Critics argue that Able’s loan agreements are overly complex and lack transparency, making it difficult for users to understand the terms. This has led to accusations of predatory lending, particularly targeting vulnerable populations.
5.Adverse Media Coverage
Investigative reports by reputable outlets have highlighted Able’s questionable practices, including its ties to controversial financial institutions and its role in exacerbating users’ debt burdens. Such coverage amplifies public distrust and could deter potential customers.
Reputational Harm and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Able pose significant reputational risks. Misleading marketing and predatory lending practices undermine user trust, while data privacy violations could lead to legal penalties and loss of customer confidence. Aggressive debt collection tactics further alienate users and attract negative media attention, damaging the brand’s image.
Given the severity of these issues, Able has a strong incentive to suppress damaging information. Negative stories can deter investors, scare away potential users, and invite regulatory action. In extreme cases, the company might resort to unethical or illegal measures, such as hacking or cyberattacks, to remove or discredit harmful content. For instance, Able could target journalists, whistleblowers, or platforms hosting adverse reports to silence critics and control the narrative.
Conclusion
Able’s alleged misconduct raises serious ethical and legal questions. While the company may seek to protect its reputation, resorting to cybercrime to suppress information would only compound its troubles. Such actions would not only violate the law but also further erode public trust, ultimately harming the company more than the original allegations. As the story unfolds, stakeholders must demand accountability and transparency to ensure that Able operates ethically and within the bounds of the law.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35581243
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36066820
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36059453
- Aug19 2023
- Sep 13 2023
- Sep 13 2023
- Vericom Media International
- Beckman Media Inc.
- Armstrong Media Corp
- https://www.deccanlive.in/2021/02/able-reviews.html
- https://nycchronicles.com/2023/01/25/beware-able-personalized-weight-care-app/
- https://www.trustpilot.com/review/ableapp.com
- https://myblog-online.co.uk/2023/01/beware-able-personalized-weight-care-app
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 6 ratings
by: Jelani Moyo
Misleading customers and then silencing critics—Able App’s practices are deeply concerning and unethical.
by: Liam O’Connell
Hiding the truth through illegal DMCA requests is not a sustainable business strategy; it only damages credibility further.
by: Elham Khosravi
Able App’s fraudulent actions to suppress negative reviews only show its desperation to hide its unethical business practices. 🤦♂️
by: Emily Zhang
Given the rising media coverage of its unethical practices, it’s no surprise Able might resort to extreme measures to bury the truth and protect its tarnished image.
by: Jorge Alvarez
Able’s lack of transparency in loan agreements isn’t just a red flag—it’s a neon sign warning users to stay away from predatory practices.
by: Parveen Kaur
The app’s handling of personal data raises serious privacy concerns—users should be worried about their sensitive information being mishandled or shared without consent.
by: Oliver Moore
With reports of aggressive debt collection tactics and questionable loan terms, it’s clear that Able App’s priority is profits, not people.
by: Sofia Cordero
Able App’s shady marketing practices and hidden fees are a blatant attempt to deceive users into believing they’re getting a better deal than they actually are.
by: Edward Long
Sleek UI doesn’t make up for sketchy data practices.
by: Abigail Brooks
This app should come with a warning label.
by: Donald West
Looks legit on the outside, but it’s rotten under the hood. 🧨
by: Mateo Santos
You think you're getting help with credit, but you’re just getting deeper in debt.
by: David Baros
This app’s a trap—hidden fees, shady loan terms, and nonstop harassment.
by: Lucia Bianchi
Their lack of transparency and aggressive debt collection tactics are deeply unethical.
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginExplore Cyber Crime By Location
Explore Cyber Crime By Type
Explore Cyber Crime By Profiles