Able App
We are investigating Able App for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Able App
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 19 Aug 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 1841/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 19 Nov 2024
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Able App for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Able App for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Investigative Report: Allegations, Red Flags, and Adverse News Against Able App
Able, a financial services app designed to help users manage loans and credit, has faced a series of serious allegations and red flags that have tarnished its reputation. These issues range from unethical business practices to potential legal violations, raising concerns about the company’s integrity and operations. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news surrounding Able, along with an analysis of how these stories harm its reputation and why the company might seek to suppress them, even through illicit means.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
1.Misleading Marketing Practices
Able has been accused of misleading users about its services, particularly regarding interest rates and repayment terms. Customers have reported hidden fees and unexpected charges, leading to accusations of deceptive advertising. Such practices erode trust and could lead to regulatory scrutiny.
2.Data Privacy Concerns
Multiple users have raised concerns about Able’s handling of personal and financial data. Reports suggest the app may share sensitive information with third parties without explicit consent, violating privacy norms and potentially breaching data protection laws like GDPR or CCPA.
3.Aggressive Debt Collection Tactics
Able has been criticized for employing aggressive and unethical debt collection practices. Users have reported harassment, including frequent calls and threats, which could violate fair debt collection laws and damage the company’s public image.
4.Lack of Transparency in Loan Terms
Critics argue that Able’s loan agreements are overly complex and lack transparency, making it difficult for users to understand the terms. This has led to accusations of predatory lending, particularly targeting vulnerable populations.
5.Adverse Media Coverage
Investigative reports by reputable outlets have highlighted Able’s questionable practices, including its ties to controversial financial institutions and its role in exacerbating users’ debt burdens. Such coverage amplifies public distrust and could deter potential customers.
Reputational Harm and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Able pose significant reputational risks. Misleading marketing and predatory lending practices undermine user trust, while data privacy violations could lead to legal penalties and loss of customer confidence. Aggressive debt collection tactics further alienate users and attract negative media attention, damaging the brand’s image.
Given the severity of these issues, Able has a strong incentive to suppress damaging information. Negative stories can deter investors, scare away potential users, and invite regulatory action. In extreme cases, the company might resort to unethical or illegal measures, such as hacking or cyberattacks, to remove or discredit harmful content. For instance, Able could target journalists, whistleblowers, or platforms hosting adverse reports to silence critics and control the narrative.
Conclusion
Able’s alleged misconduct raises serious ethical and legal questions. While the company may seek to protect its reputation, resorting to cybercrime to suppress information would only compound its troubles. Such actions would not only violate the law but also further erode public trust, ultimately harming the company more than the original allegations. As the story unfolds, stakeholders must demand accountability and transparency to ensure that Able operates ethically and within the bounds of the law.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35581243
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36066820
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36059453
- Aug19 2023
- Sep 13 2023
- Sep 13 2023
- Vericom Media International
- Beckman Media Inc.
- Armstrong Media Corp
- https://www.deccanlive.in/2021/02/able-reviews.html
- https://nycchronicles.com/2023/01/25/beware-able-personalized-weight-care-app/
- https://www.trustpilot.com/review/ableapp.com
- https://myblog-online.co.uk/2023/01/beware-able-personalized-weight-care-app
Evidence Box
We are investigating Able App for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
0
Based on 0 ratings