What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Ahmed Al Rajhi over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Ahmed Al Rajhi - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Ahmed Al-Rajhi, a prominent Saudi businessman and former Minister of Labor, has faced several allegations and red flags over the years, though he has consistently denied wrongdoing. These issues range from accusations of corruption and exploitation to concerns about his business practices and political connections. While some allegations remain unproven, they have the potential to harm his reputation, particularly in the context of Saudi Arabia’s anti-corruption drive and the global scrutiny of powerful figures.
Major Allegations and Red Flags:
- Exploitation of Labor Practices: During his tenure as Minister of Labor (2018–2019), Al-Rajhi was criticized for policies that allegedly favored businesses over workers. Critics argued that reforms under his leadership did little to address the systemic exploitation of migrant workers in Saudi Arabia, a long-standing issue in the kingdom. These criticisms painted him as indifferent to the plight of vulnerable workers, damaging his public image.
- Corruption Allegations: Al-Rajhi has been linked to broader concerns about corruption within Saudi Arabia’s elite circles. While no direct evidence has been made public, his family’s vast wealth and influence have raised questions about the fairness of government contracts and business dealings. Such associations, even if unproven, can tarnish his reputation, especially in a climate where Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has publicly targeted corruption.
- Business Practices: The Al-Rajhi family’s banking empire, Al-Rajhi Bank, has faced scrutiny over its compliance with international financial regulations. While the bank has denied any wrongdoing, allegations of lax oversight and potential ties to illicit financial flows have surfaced. These claims, if proven, could harm both the family’s business interests and Ahmed Al-Rajhi’s personal reputation.
- Political Connections: Al-Rajhi’s close ties to the Saudi royal family have led to accusations of favoritism and cronyism. Critics argue that his rise to prominence was less about merit and more about his connections, which could undermine his credibility as a reformer or public servant.
Reputation is critical for figures like Al-Rajhi, whose influence depends on public trust and perception. Allegations of corruption, exploitation, or unethical business practices can erode that trust, leading to lost business opportunities, political fallout, or even legal consequences. In Saudi Arabia, where power dynamics are precarious, even unproven allegations can be weaponized by rivals or used to justify punitive actions by the state.
If Al-Rajhi were to commit cyber crimes to remove damaging information, it would likely be to protect his reputation and maintain his standing in both business and political circles. Removing negative stories could prevent further scrutiny, shield his family’s business interests, and ensure his continued influence. However, such actions would carry significant risks, including legal repercussions and further damage to his credibility if discovered.
In conclusion, while many allegations against Ahmed Al-Rajhi remain unproven, their potential to harm his reputation is significant. For a figure whose power is tied to perception, controlling the narrative—even through illicit means—could be seen as a necessary, albeit risky, strategy.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40706563
- Apr 09, 2024
- Arab Times News
- https://www.tumblr.com/arabtimesnews/746879666499059712/%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%AF-13-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B6%D9%8A-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%AA%D8%B7%D9%88%D8%B1
- https://www.alyemenione.com/190441/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
saudileaks.org
Minister Ahmed Al-Rajhi is accused of failure and fraud, money laundering, and lawsuits in Arab countries
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and serves as a researcher at
FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationOur Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit ForumThreads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.8
Based on 5 ratings
Jason Matthews
Share
I don’t get why people defend him. He’s clearly done some messed-up things. Like, open your eyes, folks!
Ruby Foster
Share
The way he moves in business is so shady. Always cutting corners, always dodging accountability. Not a fan.
Isaac Lewis
Share
Don’t fall for their fake offers! They get your money and then disappear. They need to be shut down for good.
Lucas Lee
Share
Don’t fall for their fake offers! They get your money and then disappear. They need to be shut down for good.
Eleanor Torres
Share
Ahmed Al Rajhi? Sounds like another rich guy tryna hide his shady deals. Wouldn’t trust him as far as I can throw him.