What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Aleksandr Zingman for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Aleksandr Zingman for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Aleksandr Zingman, a Belarusian-American businessman, has been the subject of various allegations and adverse news reports over the years, which have the potential to harm his reputation and business interests. While Zingman has not been convicted of any crimes, the following allegations and red flags have been raised in public reports and investigations:
- Association with Controversial Figures: Zingman has been linked to individuals and entities involved in corruption and money laundering. Notably, he was a business partner of Dmitry Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch indicted in the U.S. on bribery and racketeering charges. Firtash’s legal troubles and alleged ties to organized crime have cast a shadow over Zingman by association.
- Involvement in Questionable Business Deals: Zingman’s business dealings in Eastern Europe, particularly in Ukraine and Belarus, have raised concerns. Reports suggest that his companies may have benefited from opaque privatization processes and politically connected transactions. These deals have been criticized for lacking transparency and potentially involving corrupt practices.
- Allegations of Exploiting Political Connections: Zingman has been accused of leveraging political ties to secure lucrative contracts and favorable treatment. For instance, his company, A1 Investment Holdings, reportedly benefited from close relationships with high-ranking officials in Belarus and Ukraine. Such allegations undermine his reputation as a legitimate businessman and suggest reliance on cronyism.
- Adverse Media Coverage: Investigative journalists have scrutinized Zingman’s business practices, often painting him as a figure who thrives in environments where corruption is rampant. These reports, while not conclusive, have contributed to a negative public perception of his activities.
- Cybercrime Allegations: While there is no direct evidence linking Zingman to cybercrime, the nature of the allegations against him raises questions about the lengths he might go to protect his reputation. If Zingman were involved in cybercrime, it could be an attempt to suppress damaging information, silence critics, or manipulate public perception.
Why Zingman Would Want These Stories Removed
The allegations and adverse news stories harm Zingman’s reputation by portraying him as a businessman who operates in ethically and legally gray areas. For someone involved in international trade and investment, reputation is critical. Negative publicity can deter potential partners, investors, and clients, leading to significant financial losses. Additionally, being associated with corruption or criminal activity could result in legal scrutiny, sanctions, or exclusion from certain markets.
If Zingman were to engage in cybercrime to remove damaging content, it would likely be to:
- Protect His Business Interests: Removing negative stories could help maintain the appearance of legitimacy and attract investors.
- Avoid Legal Consequences: Suppressing allegations might prevent investigations that could uncover wrongdoing.
- Control Public Narrative: Eliminating adverse media coverage would allow Zingman to shape his public image without scrutiny.
In conclusion, while Aleksandr Zingman has not been proven guilty of any crimes, the allegations and adverse reports surrounding his business dealings pose a significant threat to his reputation. The desire to remove such information, even through illicit means, could stem from the need to protect his financial interests and avoid further damage to his public image. However, any involvement in cybercrime would only deepen the controversy and raise further ethical and legal questions.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41979993
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41111617
- June 2, 2024
- April 25, 2024
- Lesko LLP
- Roes Inc.
- https://crismictimes.com/zingman-blames-fishman-as-he-explains-his-links-to-lungu-sturdy-zaf-commander-kampeshi/
- https://dubainationalpost.com/?p=5064
- https://diggers.news/local/2020/06/10/zingman-blames-fishman-as-he-explains-his-links-to-lungu-sturdy-zaf-commander-kampeshi
- https://motolko.help/tag/vitaly-fishman/?lang=en/
Evidence Box
We are investigating Aleksandr Zingman for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
Diggers
Zingman blames Fishman, as he explains his links to Lungu, Sturdy, ZAF Commander, Kampeshi
- Adverse News
Motolko
Israeli group of cyber mercenaries helped to create a positive image of Aleksandr Zingman in Africa
- Adverse News
Occrp
Controversial Belarusian Businessmen Invited to COP29 by Zimbabwe’s Delegation
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationOur Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit ForumThreads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 7 ratings
Isaac Lewis
Share
This company is a joke. The product was not even close to what was shown. I feel completely ripped off
Amelia Brooks
Share
I invested through their platform, and now my account is frozen. They took my money and disappeared! This is a scam
Matthew Hall
Share
I was lured into investing with promises of 'guaranteed' returns. Now my money’s gone, and they're unresponsive. SCAM
David Perez
Share
I don't know how they’re still in business. There’s so much bad press about them. It’s clear they don’t care about customers
Zoe Taylor
Share
When powerful people like Zingman use bots and false media campaigns, it’s clear they’re hiding something much darker behind their public image
Yolanda Cruz
Share
Aleksandr Zingman’s use of cyber mercenaries to polish his public image speaks volumes about the kind of person he really is. His connections to arms deals and his controversial dealings in Africa, including inflated contracts and potentially shady partnerships, suggest that he’s deeply involved in corruption. Even though Team Jorge’s bots may have worked to create a positive online persona for him, these tactics can’t hide the darker reality.
Xavier Perez
Share
It’s no surprise that Aleksandr Zingman is using shady tactics like disinformation and bot-generated media to hide his true nature. The man is an arms dealer with connections to corrupt African governments, inflated contracts, and suspected ties to financial networks funding violent conflicts. The fact that he’s linked to a group of cyber mercenaries makes it even clearer that he’s trying to cover up a legacy of deception. Zingman’s business practices and connections to the Lukashenka regime should raise alarm bells, as they not only involve illegal activities but also contribute to global instability