CyberCriminal.com

Brad Burmester

We are investigating Brad Burmester for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Brad Burmester

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : November 30, 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 9012/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 22 Nov 2024

Brad Burmester
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Brad Burmester in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Brad Burmester over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Brad Burmester - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

The Troubled History of Brad Burmester: A Summary of Allegations and Reputation Risks

Brad Burmester, a former security guard and football coach based in Kirkland, Washington, has faced multiple controversies that have tarnished his reputation and raised serious ethical concerns. These allegations span financial fraud, misuse of authority, and behavior that undermines trust in his professional roles.

 

Major Allegations and Red Flags

Insurance Fraud Scheme
In 2017, Burmester pleaded guilty to first-degree felony theft for orchestrating an auto glass repair scam. Operating a business named “Alligator Auto Glass” out of his home, Burmester exploited his role at Juanita High School to access personal information belonging to students, parents, and staff. Using this data, he filed 15 fraudulent insurance claims with PEMCO Insurance for windshield repairs that were never performed, defrauding the company of $6,569. His actions led to court-mandated restitution, community service, and fines, marking a severe breach of trust.

Hostile Environment Allegations
While working as a football coach, Burmester was implicated in a lawsuit involving the Issaquah School District. The lawsuit accused the district of failing to address bullying and harassment, with allegations that Burmester himself contributed to the hostile environment. Reports indicate he endorsed derogatory comments made on social media during school hours, failing to uphold his responsibilities as a mentor and authority figure.

Manipulation of Online Narratives
There is evidence suggesting Burmester has attempted to suppress negative coverage of his actions by misusing legal processes such as copyright takedown notices. These efforts appear to target articles and posts documenting his past controversies, furthering the perception of an individual more focused on reputation management than accountability.

 

Reputational Impact

The above allegations collectively portray Burmester as someone who has consistently acted in self-interest at the expense of others. The insurance fraud incident demonstrates criminal behavior and an abuse of privileged access, while the hostile environment allegations highlight a failure to create a safe and supportive space in an educational setting. Attempts to manipulate the public narrative further undermine his credibility, reinforcing the image of a person unwilling to face the consequences of his actions.

These controversies have significant repercussions on his employability and public image. Employers and community members may question his ethical standards and integrity, particularly in roles requiring trust, mentorship, or responsibility.

 

Why He Might Seek Removal of These Stories

The presence of these stories online severely damages Burmester’s personal and professional prospects. With his reputation tied to these incidents, opportunities for employment, community involvement, or public trust are likely hindered. Given this, it’s plausible that Burmester might seek to have such stories removed to preserve what remains of his reputation.

 

Conclusion

The allegations against Brad Burmester showcase a pattern of unethical and illegal behavior that continues to harm his reputation. While the motivation to suppress negative information is understandable, the actions taken to achieve this—if unethical—only further erode public trust. Transparency, accountability, and meaningful efforts to rebuild trust are the only paths to redemption.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30007326
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/29883870
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/29883870
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/32886653
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30176169
  • November 30, 2022
  • December 11, 2022
  • December 20, 2022
  • December 23, 2022
  • January  03, 2023
  • Musha LLC
  • Billory and Co Africa
  • James LLC Europe
  • Dixit LAWFIRM LLC
  • Melowa and Co.
  • https://www.alvareviewcourier.com/story/2018/10/04/regional/kansas-man-admits-importing-endangered-leopards-cats/42156.html
  • https://www.wibw.com/content/news/Kansas-man-fined-5000-for-importing-endangered-leopards-501590001.html
  • https://www.animallaw.info/article/lacey-act-americas-premier-weapon-fight-against-unlawful-wildlife-trafficking
  • https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/29/kansas-man-fined-5000-for-importing-endangered-leo/
  • https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/national/2017/01/26/276477.htm

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

claimsjournal.com

Fraud News Around the Nation

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

komonews.com

Former Juanita High School coach pleads guilty to theft

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

kirklandreporter.com

Former JHS security guard pleads guilty to insurance fraud

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login