CyberCriminal.com

Craig Smith

We are investigating Craig Smith for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Craig Smith

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 21 Mar 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 54354/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024

Craig Smith
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Craig Smith in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating Craig Smith for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating Craig Smith for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

Craig Smith has been the subject of multiple legal troubles and controversies that have severely impacted his reputation. From drug-related offenses to financial scandals and alleged attempts to erase negative information, Smith’s history paints a troubling picture. His actions have not only led to legal consequences but have also raised ethical concerns about his willingness to manipulate public perception.

Drug Conviction and Organized Crime Links:

Craig Smith, a Brighton resident, was sentenced to two years in prison for possession with intent to supply cannabis. Authorities discovered over 8 kilograms of cannabis, valued at £25,000, along with drug paraphernalia and evidence of drug dealing. The case revealed Smith’s involvement in the local drug trade, tarnishing his public image and legal standing.

Money Laundering and High-Speed Chase:

In 1993, Smith was implicated in a money laundering operation, where he was caught transferring $1.68 million in cash. When confronted, he attempted to flee in a vehicle, endangering law enforcement officers by driving at them, which led to gunfire. He was eventually arrested after crashing his vehicle and attempting to escape on foot. His actions led to an enhanced sentence due to obstruction of justice.

Financial Mismanagement Controversy:

In 2015, former NBA player Craig Smith alleged he was defrauded by his business manager, who reportedly forged his signature to siphon over $2 million from his accounts. While Smith was a victim in this case, the financial scandal further damaged his reputation, raising concerns about his financial dealings and business acumen.

Alleged Attempts to Erase Negative Information:

There are concerns that Smith has attempted to remove damaging online information related to his criminal past. This includes potential efforts to suppress news articles and legal records, possibly through legal loopholes or unauthorized means. Such actions raise ethical and legal concerns regarding the lengths he might go to protect his reputation.

Reputational Damage and Consequences:

The combination of drug-related offenses, financial scandals, and alleged attempts to manipulate public perception has severely impacted Smith’s reputation. His criminal record and legal troubles could hinder future opportunities, making it difficult for him to rebuild credibility in professional and social circles.

Potential Motivation for Information Removal:

Given the extent of his criminal history, Smith has a strong motive to suppress negative information. By eliminating adverse news, he could attempt to rehabilitate his image and secure future business or personal opportunities. However, resorting to illegal tactics—such as hacking or fraudulent legal claims—to erase these records would only deepen his legal troubles.


  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27043422
  • March 21, 2022
  • Daniel Finley
  • https://world-news-times.blogspot.com/2009/05/dealer-jailed-over-cannabis-haul.html
  • https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/4373748.dealer-jailed-over-cannabis-haul/

Evidence Box

We are investigating Craig Smith for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

law.justia.com

Craig A. Smith, II v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 23-10157 (11th Cir. 2024)

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

casetext.com

Smith v. Smith Transp.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

theargus.co.uk

Dealer jailed over cannabis haul

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert