CyberCriminal.com

Craig Smith

We are investigating Craig Smith for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Craig Smith

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 21 Mar 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 54354/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024

Craig Smith
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Craig Smith in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Craig Smith over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Craig Smith - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Craig Smith has been the subject of multiple legal troubles and controversies that have severely impacted his reputation. From drug-related offenses to financial scandals and alleged attempts to erase negative information, Smith’s history paints a troubling picture. His actions have not only led to legal consequences but have also raised ethical concerns about his willingness to manipulate public perception.

Drug Conviction and Organized Crime Links:

Craig Smith, a Brighton resident, was sentenced to two years in prison for possession with intent to supply cannabis. Authorities discovered over 8 kilograms of cannabis, valued at £25,000, along with drug paraphernalia and evidence of drug dealing. The case revealed Smith’s involvement in the local drug trade, tarnishing his public image and legal standing.

Money Laundering and High-Speed Chase:

In 1993, Smith was implicated in a money laundering operation, where he was caught transferring $1.68 million in cash. When confronted, he attempted to flee in a vehicle, endangering law enforcement officers by driving at them, which led to gunfire. He was eventually arrested after crashing his vehicle and attempting to escape on foot. His actions led to an enhanced sentence due to obstruction of justice.

Financial Mismanagement Controversy:

In 2015, former NBA player Craig Smith alleged he was defrauded by his business manager, who reportedly forged his signature to siphon over $2 million from his accounts. While Smith was a victim in this case, the financial scandal further damaged his reputation, raising concerns about his financial dealings and business acumen.

Alleged Attempts to Erase Negative Information:

There are concerns that Smith has attempted to remove damaging online information related to his criminal past. This includes potential efforts to suppress news articles and legal records, possibly through legal loopholes or unauthorized means. Such actions raise ethical and legal concerns regarding the lengths he might go to protect his reputation.

Reputational Damage and Consequences:

The combination of drug-related offenses, financial scandals, and alleged attempts to manipulate public perception has severely impacted Smith’s reputation. His criminal record and legal troubles could hinder future opportunities, making it difficult for him to rebuild credibility in professional and social circles.

Potential Motivation for Information Removal:

Given the extent of his criminal history, Smith has a strong motive to suppress negative information. By eliminating adverse news, he could attempt to rehabilitate his image and secure future business or personal opportunities. However, resorting to illegal tactics—such as hacking or fraudulent legal claims—to erase these records would only deepen his legal troubles.


  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27043422
  • March 21, 2022
  • Daniel Finley
  • https://world-news-times.blogspot.com/2009/05/dealer-jailed-over-cannabis-haul.html
  • https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/4373748.dealer-jailed-over-cannabis-haul/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

law.justia.com

Craig A. Smith, II v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 23-10157 (11th Cir. 2024)

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

casetext.com

Smith v. Smith Transp.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

theargus.co.uk

Dealer jailed over cannabis haul

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login