Daniel Tisone

We are investigating Daniel Tisone for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Daniel Tisone

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 28 Feb 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 0610/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024

Investigation Report
What are they trying to censor
Evidence and Media
Adverse Media
Comments & user feedback

Due Diligence

Get everything we know about Daniel Tisone in one downloadable PDF document

Learn More

Is This About You?

We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Daniel Tisone over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Daniel Tisone - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Investigative Report: Allegations, Red Flags, and Adverse News Against Daniel Tisone

Daniel Tisone, a controversial figure in the financial and cryptocurrency sectors, has been the subject of numerous allegations, red flags, and adverse news reports. These accusations range from fraudulent business practices and misleading investors to unethical behavior and legal troubles. Below is a summary of the major allegations and their implications for Tisone’s reputation and career.

Allegations of Fraudulent Business Practices

Daniel Tisone has been accused of orchestrating fraudulent schemes, particularly in the cryptocurrency space. Reports suggest that he misled investors by promoting high-return investment opportunities that failed to materialize. These allegations paint Tisone as a figure who prioritizes personal gain over ethical business practices, damaging his credibility in the financial industry.

Legal Troubles and Regulatory Scrutiny

Tisone has faced legal challenges, including lawsuits and regulatory investigations. These cases often revolve around accusations of misrepresentation, breach of contract, and failure to deliver on promises. Such legal entanglements not only harm his professional reputation but also raise questions about his ability to operate within the bounds of the law.

Misleading Marketing and Unethical Behavior

Several reports highlight Tisone’s use of aggressive and misleading marketing tactics to attract investors. He has been accused of exaggerating the potential returns of his ventures while downplaying the risks. This unethical behavior erodes trust and positions him as a figure willing to exploit others for personal profit.

Negative Publicity and Media Scrutiny

Tisone has been the subject of critical media coverage, with outlets questioning his business practices and integrity. Articles and investigative reports have painted him as a controversial and untrustworthy figure, further tarnishing his public image. This negative publicity can deter potential investors and partners from engaging with him.

Why Daniel Tisone Would Want These Stories Removed

The allegations and adverse news harm Daniel Tisone’s reputation in several ways:

Loss of Trust: Accusations of fraud and unethical behavior deter potential investors and partners, limiting his ability to secure funding or grow his ventures.

Legal Risks: Ongoing legal troubles and regulatory scrutiny increase the likelihood of fines, penalties, or even criminal charges.

Financial Impact: A damaged reputation can lead to reduced revenue, loss of business opportunities, and difficulty attracting new clients.

Given the severity of these consequences, Tisone may feel compelled to remove damaging content, even if it means resorting to cybercrime. For instance, hacking or pressuring websites to take down critical articles could temporarily suppress negative information. However, such actions would only compound his legal and ethical issues, creating a vicious cycle of reputational damage.

Conclusion

Daniel Tisone’s alleged fraudulent practices, legal troubles, and unethical behavior paint a troubling picture of a figure struggling to maintain credibility. While the desire to remove damaging content is understandable, resorting to cybercrime would only exacerbate the situation. Instead, Tisone should address these issues transparently and reform his practices to rebuild trust with investors and the public.

https://lumendatabase.org/notices/32751559
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/32640252
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30772421

Feb 28, 2023
Feb 20, 2023
Feb 16, 2023

Sara Corp LLC Asia
Will Corp LLC
Will and Co

https://www.businessobserverfl.com/news/2022/jul/31/call-off-the-engagement-government-seeks-fraudulently-obtained-ring/
https://onlyfans.com/miakhalifa
https://www.businessobserverfl.com/news/2022/jul/31/call-off-the-engagement-government-seeks-fraudulently-obtained-ring/

https://www.winknews.com/2022/08/26/daniel-tisone-changes-to-a-guilty-plea-for-covid-relief-fraud/
https://www.tampabay.com/news/crime/2022/08/30/florida-man-pleads-guilty-to-26m-covid-19-relief-fraud/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

tampabay.com

Florida man pleads guilty to $2.6M COVID-19 relief fraud

Red Flag

Visit Link

winknews.com

Daniel Tisone changes to a guilty plea for Covid relief fraud

Red Flag

Visit Link

justice.gov

Naples Felon Pleads Guilty To $2.6 Million COVID Relief Fraud Scheme

Red Flag

Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Ongoing

Investigation Status

Escalate This Case

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment or Feedback

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

The Reputation Laundering

Did Daniel Tisone Commit a Cyber Crime?

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.