CyberCriminal.com

Deven Schuller

We are investigating Deven Schuller for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Deven Schuller

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 04 Jun 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 0872701/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024

Deven Schuller
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Deven Schuller in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating Deven Schuller for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating Deven Schuller for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

General Analysis of Allegations and Red Flags
Allegations of Scam Activity:
If Deven Schuller is linked to an investment firm accused of being a scam, this could involve allegations of fraudulent practices, such as misleading investors, promising unrealistic returns, or operating a Ponzi scheme.Such accusations would severely harm Schuller’s reputation, as they suggest a lack of integrity and trustworthiness.
Negative Reviews or Complaints :
Online forums like Reddit often host discussions about scams, where users share personal experiences or warnings about suspicious individuals or companies. If users on Reddit are labeling Schuller or his associated firm as a scam, this could indicate a pattern of complaints or negative feedback from investors or clients.
Lack of Transparency: Scam investment firms often lack transparency in their operations, such as unclear business models, hidden fees, or unverifiable credentials .If Schuller is associated with such practices, it would raise serious concerns about his professionalism and ethical standards.
Legal or Regulatory Issues:
If there are reports of investigations, lawsuits, or regulatory actions against Schuller or his firm, this would be a significant red flag. Legal troubles could indicate systemic issues with the business and further damage Schuller’s credibility .Why These Allegations Harm Reputation
Reputational harm from such allegations could include: Loss of Trust: Investors, clients, and business partners may lose confidence in Schuller and his firm, leading to financial losses and severed relationships .
Public Scrutiny:
Negative media coverage and online discussions can amplify the damage, making it difficult for Schuller to operate in the industry.
Legal and Financial Consequences: Allegations of fraud or misconduct could result in lawsuits, regulatory penalties, or even criminal charges. Motivation to Remove Damaging Information
If Deven Schuller is facing serious allegations, he may feel compelled to remove damaging content from the internet to protect his reputation and livelihood. To assess the validity of the allegations against Deven Schuller, an investigative journalist would
Verify Sources: Cross-check claims with official records, such as court documents, regulatory filings, or statements from credible authorities. Seek Evidence: Look for concrete evidence of misconduct, such as financial records, contracts, or communications. Interview Stakeholders: Speak with investors, clients, or former employees to gather firsthand accounts.
Provide Context: Explain the broader context of the allegations, including any industry trends or patterns of similar scams .Offer Fairness: Allow Schuller or his representatives to respond to the allegations and present their side of the story.
Conclusion
While I cannot access the specific links you provided, the context suggests that Deven Schuller may be facing allegations related to a potential scam investment firm. Such accusations, if true, would significantly harm his reputation and could lead to legal, financial, and professional consequences. However, without verified evidence, it is crucial to approach these claims with caution and avoid making definitive judgments. If you can provide specific details or excerpts from the links, I can offer a more tailored analysis. Otherwise, this framework highlights the importance of verifying information and maintaining ethical standards when addressing reputational issues.

https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42034308

Jun 4 2024

Uzumaki Inc

https://crismictimes.com/deven-schuller-kritik-was-ist-wirklich-dran/

https://crismictimes.com/deven-schuller-kritik-was-ist-wirklich-dran/

Evidence Box

We are investigating Deven Schuller for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

crismictimes.com

Deven Schuller Fake Copy Rights Taken down Scam

  • Removed
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert