Enterprise London Limited
We are investigating Enterprise London Limited for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Enterprise London Limited
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 1 Feb 2022
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 54333/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Enterprise London Limited for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Enterprise London Limited for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Enterprise London Limited has faced several significant allegations and adverse reports that have raised concerns regarding its business practices and overall legitimacy. These accusations have put the company’s reputation under scrutiny, with issues ranging from financial misconduct to lack of transparency.
Unregulated Business Practices and Fraudulent Activities: Enterprise London Limited has been accused of operating without adequate regulatory oversight, which has led to questions about the company’s business practices. The firm has reportedly been involved in activities that resemble fraudulent schemes, such as attracting investments without the proper licensing or legal safeguards in place. Multiple users have reported difficulties in withdrawing their funds after initial successful transactions, a red flag often associated with scam operations. These issues have led to increasing scrutiny from financial authorities and significant concern from potential clients and investors.
Improper Use of Copyright Takedown Notices: Similar to other companies under scrutiny, Enterprise London Limited has been accused of attempting to suppress negative reviews and critical information about its operations through improper use of copyright takedown notices. These false claims were allegedly filed to remove adverse content from websites, forums, and social media platforms, potentially constituting violations of copyright laws and fraud. Such actions suggest a deliberate attempt to erase negative public perception and prevent transparency, further undermining the company’s credibility.
Negative Customer Experiences and Lack of Transparency: Several clients have shared negative experiences with Enterprise London Limited, citing problems such as the inability to withdraw funds, unfulfilled promises regarding investment returns, and lack of clarity about the company’s regulatory status. In some instances, users have reported that when they sought transparency regarding the company’s business operations or asked for proof of licenses, their inquiries were either ignored or met with hostile responses. This lack of communication and transparency reflects poorly on the company’s commitment to ethical business practices and customer satisfaction.
Impact on Reputation: These allegations have significantly harmed the reputation of Enterprise London Limited. The company’s apparent involvement in unregulated activities, its difficulty in maintaining transparency with clients, and its attempts to hide negative feedback have led to a perception of dishonesty and unethical behavior. For a business that relies on customer trust, these issues can lead to long-term damage, potentially resulting in legal consequences, loss of clients, and difficulties in attracting new investors.
Potential Motivation for Information Removal: In an attempt to protect its reputation, Enterprise London Limited may seek to remove or suppress critical information. By eliminating negative reviews, reports of fraudulent behavior, and claims of regulatory violations, the company could attempt to project a more favorable image to the public and investors. However, taking such actions, particularly through unethical or illegal means, could backfire, further damaging the company’s standing and leading to additional legal and financial consequences.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/26615969
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/26615828
- Feb 01, 2022
- Feb 01, 2022
- Margene Kingston
- Margene Kingston
- https://margene6185.blogspot.com/2022/02/enterprise-london-limited.html
- https://margene6185.blogspot.com/2022/02/enterprise-london-limited_1.html
- https://scaud.info/blog/post/enterprise-london-limited-lohobroker-kotoryj-zarabatyvaet-milliony-na-doverchivyh-grazhdanah
- https://brokertribunal.com/brokers/enterprise-london-limited
Evidence Box
We are investigating Enterprise London Limited for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
scaud.info
Enterprise London Limited – a scam broker that makes millions on gullible citizens
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2.1
Based on 8 ratings
Julian Hall
Share
I was promised a secure investment, but they stole my money and altered the documents. Never trust them!
Caleb Stewart
Share
They manipulated contracts to make it look like I agreed to terms. This is pure forgery, and they need to be shut down.
Grace Morgan
Share
I was promised a secure investment, but they stole my money and altered the documents. Never trust them
Nathaniel Ross
Share
SCAMSTERSSS!!!!
Vera Petrov
Share
I wish I had done more research before signing up with Enterprise London Limited. Everything seemed legitimate at first—the platform offered great bonuses and access to 'exclusive' trading tools. However, when I tried to withdraw my funds, they blocked my account and never responded to my requests. I also downloaded AnyDesk for ‘help,’ which turned out to be a huge mistake. This is a scam, and I regret not listening to my instincts earlier.
Emily Brown
Share
I made the mistake of investing with Enterprise London Limited after seeing their flashy website and tempting bonuses. At first, everything seemed fine—my account showed profits, and I was promised personal trading advice. But when I tried to withdraw my funds, my account was locked, and I couldn’t get in touch with anyone. This platform is nothing but a well-designed scam to steal your money. Avoid them at all costs!
Feng Wei
Share
Scammed out of my hard-earned money. No way to contact anyone for support. Complete fraud!
Stella Nelson
Share
These people forged contracts and misled me about their services. They disappeared as soon as I demanded answers. Total fraud!