
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Envi FX over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Envi FX - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor
Envi FX, a forex trading platform, has faced a series of allegations and adverse reports that have raised significant concerns about its operations, transparency, and ethical practices. These allegations have damaged its reputation and trustworthiness in the financial trading community. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Envi FX, along with an analysis of why the company might seek to suppress this information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
Lack of Regulatory Compliance: Envi FX has been accused of operating without proper regulatory oversight in key jurisdictions. Unlike reputable forex brokers, Envi FX is not registered with major financial regulators such as the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), or the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). This lack of regulation raises concerns about the safety of client funds and the platform’s legitimacy.
Withdrawal Issues: Numerous clients have reported difficulties withdrawing funds from their Envi FX accounts. Complaints include delayed processing times, unexplained fees, and outright refusal to release funds. These allegations suggest potential financial mismanagement or even fraudulent behavior.
Misleading Advertising: Envi FX has been criticized for using aggressive and misleading marketing tactics. The company allegedly promises high returns and low risks, which is a common red flag in the forex industry. Such practices can mislead inexperienced traders into making poor financial decisions.
Poor Customer Support: Clients have reported inadequate customer service, including unresponsive support teams and a lack of resolution for technical or financial issues. This has led to frustration and mistrust among users.
Data Privacy Concerns: There are allegations that Envi FX may have mishandled client data, including personal and financial information. Reports suggest weak cybersecurity measures, raising fears of data breaches and identity theft.
Negative Online Reviews and Scam Allegations: Envi FX has been the subject of numerous negative reviews on trading forums and scam-reporting websites. Traders have accused the platform of being a scam, citing issues such as manipulated trading conditions, hidden fees, and account freezes.
Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Envi FX have severely harmed its reputation. The lack of regulatory compliance undermines its credibility as a trustworthy forex broker, while withdrawal issues and scam accusations erode client trust. Misleading advertising and poor customer support further tarnish its image, making it difficult to attract and retain clients. Data privacy concerns add another layer of risk, deterring potential users who prioritize security.
For Envi FX, the stakes are high. Negative publicity can lead to a loss of clients, legal scrutiny, and a decline in revenue. The company may view the removal of damaging stories as essential to its survival. In an era where online reputation is critical, Envi FX might consider cybercrime—such as hacking into review platforms, deleting negative content, or launching disinformation campaigns—as a way to control the narrative and protect its business interests.
Conclusion
Envi FX alleged misconduct, including regulatory non-compliance, withdrawal issues, and misleading advertising, has cast a shadow over its operations. These red flags have damaged its reputation and raised questions about its legitimacy as a forex trading platform. While the motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving client trust and avoiding legal repercussions—the potential use of cybercrime to achieve these ends is deeply concerning.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43942427
- Aug 19 2024
- StellarNet Solutions LLC
- https://envifx.com/
- https://www.myfxbook.com/reviews/brokers/envi-fx/2524091,1
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation





































Targeted Content and Red Flags

About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case


Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.


You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Patrick Vestner
Investigation Ongoing
Cresen
Investigation Ongoing
Hans Raj Shiv
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.4
Based on 12 ratings
by: Noah Bailey
Withdrawal issues aren’t bugs they’re business tactics. Users beg for their own money back while support offers silence or excuses. That’s not a hiccup—it’s a blueprint for fraud.
by: Ethan Gonzalez
Withdrawal complaints are everywhere. Delays, denials, and ridiculous fees. If you ever get your money back, consider yourself lucky. That’s not finance it’s finesse.
by: Roger Dunn
Feels more like a Ponzi than a brokerage 🧨
by: Audrey George
Lost so much here I’m embarrassed to even talk about it 😞
by: Carter Gonzalez
I signed up for their program, but they altered the agreement. The papers were fake, and now I’m left with nothing. Don't trust them!
by: Eleanor Lopez
This isn’t a legitimate company. They’ve been running fake schemes for months, stealing personal details, and forging contracts. Completely unreliable!!!!
by: Lillian Carter
Their whole operation is built on deception
by: Miles Reed
Such fake people pretending to be brokers but extremely fraudelent pathetic!!!
by: Michael Adams
I had to get a new phone unexpectedly two weeks ago and needed to contact customer support to remove the 2FA authentication from my account so I could set it up on my new phone. I had just made a...
by: Samuel Gray
want to warn others about a scam involving PAMM (Percentage Allocation Management Module) account managers. At first, the manager trades well and shows steady profits for a few weeks or months. During this time, they let you withdraw small amounts...
by: Charlotte Carter
one of the worse broker ,they try to create fake moves on the chart to hit your stop loss.
by: Daniel Foster
This is not just a scam; it’s a well-planned fraud network. I contacted their support team after noticing discrepancies in my contract, and the response I got was suspicious.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations