What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Farzin Fardin – 3F Music over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Farzin Fardin – 3F Music - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Farzin Fardin, the founder of 3F Music, has been embroiled in a series of controversies and allegations that have significantly tarnished his reputation and that of his company. These allegations range from financial misconduct to unethical business practices, and even potential ties to cybercrime. Below is a summary of the major allegations and red flags associated with Farzin Fardin and 3F Music, along with an analysis of how these issues harm his reputation and why he might resort to extreme measures to suppress this information.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
Financial Misconduct: Farzin Fardin has been accused of embezzling funds from investors and artists associated with 3F Music. Reports suggest that he diverted company funds for personal use, including luxury purchases and real estate investments. These allegations have led to lawsuits and a loss of trust among stakeholders.
Unethical Business Practices: Several artists and collaborators have come forward with claims that Fardin engaged in exploitative contracts, withholding royalties, and manipulating financial records to underreport earnings. These practices have not only harmed the artists financially but also damaged 3F Music’s credibility in the music industry.
Adverse Media Coverage: Investigative journalists have uncovered a pattern of deceit and manipulation in Fardin’s business dealings. Media outlets have published exposés detailing his questionable practices, including allegations of bribery and corruption to secure business deals and silence critics.
Cybercrime Allegations: There are growing suspicions that Fardin and 3F Music may be involved in cybercrime activities aimed at suppressing negative information. Reports suggest that the company has engaged in hacking, doxxing, and other illegal online activities to remove damaging content and intimidate whistleblowers.
Impact on Reputation
These allegations have severely damaged Farzin Fardin’s reputation and that of 3F Music. The financial misconduct and unethical business practices have led to a loss of trust among investors, artists, and industry peers. The adverse media coverage has further exacerbated the situation, painting Fardin as a deceitful and unscrupulous businessman. The cybercrime allegations add a layer of criminality to his profile, making it even more difficult for him to regain credibility.
Motivation for Cybercrime
Given the severity of these allegations, it is understandable why Farzin Fardin and 3F Music would want to suppress this information. The negative publicity not only harms their business prospects but also opens them up to legal repercussions. By engaging in cybercrime, they can remove damaging content from the internet, intimidate whistleblowers, and create a facade of legitimacy. This desperate move, however, only serves to further incriminate them and deepen the public’s mistrust.
In conclusion, the allegations against Farzin Fardin and 3F Music are serious and multifaceted, encompassing financial misconduct, unethical business practices, and potential cybercrime. These issues have significantly harmed their reputation, providing a strong motive for them to engage in illegal activities to suppress negative information. However, such actions only serve to compound their problems and further erode public trust.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39809128
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35874105
- February 29, 2024
- September 05, 2023
- Webamooz
- Ravioski Inc
- https://nycchronicles.com/2022/03/05/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is-uniquefinance-fraudster-not-a-crypto-activist/
- https://www.webamooz.com/en/2022/05/09/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is-unique-finance-fraudster-not-a-crypto-activist/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
webamooz
Farzin Fardin Fard who has 3fmusic identity is unique finance fraudster, not a crypto activist!
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationOur Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit ForumThreads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1
Based on 3 ratings
Hamza Karim
Share
They provide fake contracts that look official, but if you closely examine the fine print, you’ll see discrepancies. They trick people into signing deals that don’t legally hold up, leaving victims with no legal recourse.
Miguel Ortega
Share
They have been associated with multiple fraud cases, and their past ventures were shut down due to illegal activities. They just rebrand under a new name and continue the scams.
onathan Berkovitz
Share
They lied about their services and disappeared after I paid. Total scam