CyberCriminal.com

Farzin Fardin – Unique Finance

We are investigating Farzin Fardin – Unique Finance for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Farzin Fardin - Unique Finance

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 16 Oct 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1466/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024

Farzin Fardin – Unique Finance
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Farzin Fardin – Unique Finance in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating Farzin Fardin – Unique Finance for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating Farzin Fardin – Unique Finance for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

Farzin Fardin and Unique Finance have been embroiled in a series of alarming allegations and red flags that paint a troubling picture of their operations. Reports suggest a pattern of financial misconduct, including accusations of fraudulent investment schemes, mismanagement of client funds, and regulatory violations. These allegations have sparked investigations by financial authorities, further tarnishing their reputation. Clients and investors have come forward with claims of significant financial losses, alleging that Unique Finance failed to deliver on promised returns and engaged in deceptive practices to attract investments.

One of the most damaging allegations is the potential involvement in a Ponzi-like scheme, where new investor funds were allegedly used to pay returns to earlier investors, rather than being invested as promised. This has led to widespread distrust among clients and partners, with many accusing Farzin Fardin of prioritizing personal gain over ethical business practices. Additionally, there have been reports of opaque accounting practices, raising concerns about the company’s financial transparency and accountability.

The adverse news surrounding Farzin Fardin and Unique Finance has had a devastating impact on their reputation. Trust in the financial sector is paramount, and these allegations have eroded confidence among clients, investors, and regulatory bodies. The company’s ability to attract new business and retain existing clients has been severely compromised, with many stakeholders distancing themselves to avoid association with the scandal.

In such a high-stakes environment, the motivation to suppress damaging information becomes dangerously compelling. If Farzin Fardin and Unique Finance were to resort to cybercrime—such as hacking, data manipulation, or coercing third parties to remove negative content—it would likely be driven by desperation to salvage their reputation and avoid further legal and financial fallout. Removing adverse news could temporarily obscure the truth, allowing the company to continue operations without immediate scrutiny. However, such actions would only deepen the ethical and legal quagmire, potentially leading to more severe consequences if discovered.

Ultimately, the allegations against Farzin Fardin and Unique Finance highlight a disturbing disregard for ethical standards and regulatory compliance. While the temptation to erase negative press may be strong, engaging in cybercrime would only compound their troubles, further undermining any remaining trust and credibility. The company’s best course of action would be to address these issues transparently and cooperate fully with investigations, though the damage to their reputation may already be irreversible.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45352009
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36768925
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36734802
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35289490
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35289490
  • October 12, 2024
  • October 16, 2023
  • October 14, 2023
  • August 02, 2023
  • October 10, 2023
  • Bason Media Corp.
  • Brown Group of Companies
  • Lake Media Group
  • Lam Media International
  • Webamooz
  • https://cornellgazzetta.com/%D9%87%D9%85%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%86-%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%A8%D8%A7-%DA%A9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%AA-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%82/
  • https://www.deccanlive.in/2021/01/3fmusic.html
  • https://nycchronicles.com/2022/03/05/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is-unique-finance-fraudster-not-a-crypto-activist/
  • https://gadgetnews.net/877334/mohsen-yeganeh-collaboration-ponzi-fraudster
  • https://www.webamooz.com/1401/02/16/%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%B2%DB%8C%D9%86-%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%86-%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D8%A7-%D9%87%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AA-3fmusic-%DA%A9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1-%DB%8C%D9%88%D9%86
  • https://www.webamooz.com/en/2022/05/09/farzin-fardin-fard-who-has-3fmusic-identity-is-unique-finance-fraudster-not-a-crypto-activist/

Evidence Box

We are investigating Farzin Fardin – Unique Finance for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

adsoftheworld

FarzinfardinfardScammer

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

webamooz

Farzin Fardin Fard who has 3fmusic identity is unique finance fraudster, not a crypto activist!

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

webamooz

Webamooz.com’s Stand Against False DMCA Claims

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert