Fernando Martinho – Nimbus
We are investigating Fernando Martinho – Nimbus for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Fernando Martinho - Nimbus
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 11 Jul 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 0642/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Fernando Martinho – Nimbus for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Fernando Martinho – Nimbus for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Fernando Martinho, associated with Nimbus, has been the subject of several allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about his business practices and ethical conduct. While the specifics of these allegations may vary depending on the sources, several recurring themes have emerged, painting a troubling picture of his professional reputation.
Major Allegations and Red Flags:
Financial Mismanagement and Fraud Allegations:
Fernando Martinho has been accused of involvement in financial mismanagement and potential fraud. Reports suggest that Nimbus, under his leadership, may have engaged in questionable financial practices, including misappropriation of funds, misleading investors, and failing to meet contractual obligations. These allegations have led to legal disputes and damaged trust among stakeholders.
Exploitation of Employees and Unethical Labor Practices:
Former employees and contractors have come forward with claims of unpaid wages, poor working conditions, and a lack of transparency in business dealings. These accusations suggest a pattern of exploiting labor to maximize profits, which has tarnished Nimbus’s reputation as a fair and ethical employer.
Misrepresentation of Business Operations:
There are allegations that Nimbus, under Martinho’s direction, misrepresented its capabilities and business achievements to attract investors and clients. This includes exaggerating the company’s technological advancements, market reach, and financial stability. Such misrepresentations could constitute fraudulent behavior and have led to legal challenges.
Environmental and Regulatory Violations:
Nimbus has faced scrutiny for allegedly disregarding environmental regulations and engaging in practices that harm the environment. These violations, if proven, could result in significant fines and further damage the company’s reputation.
Cyber Intimidation and Suppression of Criticism:
Perhaps the most alarming allegation is the use of cybercrime tactics to silence critics and remove damaging information from the internet. Reports suggest that Martinho and Nimbus may have engaged in hacking, doxxing, or other illegal activities to suppress negative press and intimidate whistleblowers. This behavior not only raises ethical concerns but also legal ones, as it violates laws governing cyber conduct and freedom of speech.
Why These Allegations Harm Reputation:
These allegations collectively paint a picture of a leader and a company willing to cut corners, exploit others, and engage in unethical or illegal behavior to achieve their goals. For Fernando Martinho and Nimbus, such accusations undermine credibility, deter potential investors and partners, and erode public trust. In the digital age, where information spreads rapidly, maintaining a clean reputation is crucial for business success. Negative press can lead to lost opportunities, legal repercussions, and long-term damage to brand image.
Motivation for Cybercrime:
If the allegations of cybercrime are true, Martinho and Nimbus may view the suppression of negative information as a necessary measure to protect their interests. By removing damaging content, they could aim to control the narrative, avoid accountability, and preserve their business relationships. However, such actions are not only illegal but also counterproductive, as they risk further exposure and harsher penalties if discovered.
In conclusion, the allegations against Fernando Martinho and Nimbus highlight significant ethical and legal concerns. While the motivation to protect one’s reputation is understandable, resorting to cybercrime to achieve this end is a dangerous and unlawful path that could exacerbate the very problems it seeks to resolve.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34915057
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34914837
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34913889
- July 11, 2023
- July 11, 2023
- July 11, 2023
- French Protection SL
- French Protection SL
- French Protection SL
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/19BDxyYDj5kBLzs3r1Ohn8ttH7EwaYjeOd45EYnrkqVk/edit?usp=sharing
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/12-2AgAeS4pGVkfa7EcAbh1pm7ay28gxcRJ9B1FtfYIM/edit?usp=sharing
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LFgpr7kiBAh9OcPsYi78GB-2Wj5LnVSoA0vNc2Bc_E/edit?usp=sharing
- https://behindmlm.com/companies/nimbus-platform-resurrecting-ponzi-with-100-annual-roi/
- https://behindmlm.com/mlm-reviews/nimbus-platform-review-2-0-new-ponzi-tokens-same-scam/
- https://behindmlm.com/mlm-reviews/nimbus-platform-review-nmbt-ponzi-points/
Evidence Box
We are investigating Fernando Martinho – Nimbus for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.1
Based on 7 ratings
Mariana Silva
Share
How do they get away with this stuff? Ordered something over a month ago and still nothing. Terrible service!
Abigail Stein
Share
The negative reviews are stacking up for a reason. Plus, their customer service is non-existent.
Hannah Feldman
Share
This isn’t a legitimate company. They’ve been running fake schemes for months, stealing personal details, and forging contracts. Completely unreliable!"
Faisal Ahmed
Share
It’s astonishing how professional these scammers appear at first glance. Their website looks real, they provide detailed documentation, and they even have fake customer service reps. But once you start questioning the legitimacy of their claims, they dodge answers and eventually vanish. They rely on sophisticated forgery and deception to steal from people. Authorities need to step in!
Leah Cohen
Share
After weeks of dealing with this so-called business, I realized everything they do is a sham. They claim to have partnerships with big firms, but all of their documentation is forged. Their representatives lie constantly, and when I pushed for legal verification, they disappeared. This isn't just a scam—it’s organized crime, and they need to be stopped!
Idris Malik
Share
They use fake testimonials and altered financial records to appear legitimate. I got duped, and now I see they’ve scammed many others too.
Alejandro Diaz
Share
They promised returns that seemed too good to be true. I later discovered their paperwork was forged, and they scammed me out of my money!!SCAMMERS