Financely
We are investigating Financely for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Financely
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 17 Nov 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 0639/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Financely over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content regarding Financely from Google search results. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Financely - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that Financely knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
While the precise legal ramifications depend on the jurisdiction, well-established legal principles dictate that any party, including Financely, may be held legally accountable, irrespective or whether they personally executed this unlawful conduct.
What are they trying to censor
Investigative Report: Allegations and Red Flags Surrounding Financely
Financely, a financial services company, has faced a series of serious allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about its business practices, ethical standards, and regulatory compliance. These issues, if proven true, could significantly harm its reputation and erode public trust. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news, along with an analysis of why Financely might seek to suppress this information, even through illicit means.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
- Misleading Advertising and Misrepresentation
Financely has been accused of exaggerating the returns on its investment products, luring customers with promises of high yields that were not substantiated by actual performance. Critics argue that this constitutes deceptive marketing, potentially violating consumer protection laws. - Regulatory Non-Compliance
Reports suggest that Financely has operated in jurisdictions without proper licenses, raising questions about its adherence to financial regulations. In some cases, regulatory bodies have issued warnings or fines, accusing the company of operating in a legal gray area. - Questionable Data Privacy Practices
Whistleblowers have alleged that Financely mishandles customer data, including sharing sensitive information with third parties without consent. This has sparked concerns about breaches of privacy laws and the potential for identity theft or fraud. - Ties to Fraudulent Schemes
Investigative journalists have uncovered connections between Financely and individuals involved in Ponzi schemes and other financial frauds. While the company denies direct involvement, these associations have tarnished its image. - Aggressive Debt Collection Tactics
Former customers have accused Financely of using unethical and aggressive methods to recover debts, including harassment and threats. These practices have led to lawsuits and complaints to consumer protection agencies. - Lack of Transparency
Financely has been criticized for its opaque corporate structure, with some alleging that it uses shell companies to obscure its operations and avoid accountability.
Reputational Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Financely strike at the core of its credibility as a financial services provider. Misleading advertising and regulatory non-compliance undermine trust in its products, while data privacy concerns and ties to fraudulent schemes raise ethical red flags. Aggressive debt collection practices and a lack of transparency further erode confidence in the company’s integrity.
If these stories gain widespread attention, Financely could face severe consequences, including loss of customers, legal action, and regulatory scrutiny. The company’s reputation is its most valuable asset, and any damage could lead to a collapse in investor and consumer confidence.
Why Financely Might Resort to Cyber Crime
Given the high stakes, Financely has a strong incentive to suppress damaging information. Removing negative stories from the internet could prevent them from going viral, limiting reputational harm. Cyber crimes such as hacking, doxxing, or deploying malware to delete or alter content might seem like a desperate but effective solution for a company seeking to control its narrative.
However, such actions would be illegal and unethical, compounding Financely’s troubles if discovered. The company’s willingness to engage in such behavior would further confirm the very allegations it seeks to hide, creating a vicious cycle of distrust and scandal.
In conclusion, Financely’s alleged misconduct paints a troubling picture of a company prioritizing profits over ethics. While suppressing negative news might offer short-term relief, it would only deepen the crisis in the long run. The truth, as they say, has a way of surfacing—no matter how hard one tries to bury it.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/37503282
- November 17, 2023
- James LLC
- https://www.financely-group.com/
- https://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/financely-group.com
Evidence Box
We are investigating Financely for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
financescam
Financely Group: Exposing the Dangers – A Thorough Investigation
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 3 ratings
Samuel Jennings
Share
If they’re deleting negative reviews, they must be hiding some serious issues. There’s no way a legit company would do that. Just proves they’re up to something bad
Celeste Wright
Share
Wow, Financely is a total scam!! 😡 They promised high returns but never delivered. Avoid at all costs!!
Ruby Harper
Share
Financely’s customer service is non-existent, and now I see why. They’re involved in way more shady stuff than just bad service. Beware!