Frank DiMattina – Staten Island
We are investigating Frank DiMattina – Staten Island for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Frank DiMattina - Staten Island
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 11 October 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 1455/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Frank DiMattina – Staten Island for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Frank DiMattina – Staten Island for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Frank DiMattina, a Staten Island-based businessman and political figure, has faced several allegations and red flags over the years that have raised concerns about his reputation and conduct. These issues range from legal troubles to ethical controversies, which, if true, could significantly damage his public image and professional standing. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news associated with DiMattina, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress such information, even through illicit means.
Major Allegations and Red Flags:
- Legal Troubles and Fraud Allegations:
DiMattina has been embroiled in legal disputes, including allegations of fraud and financial misconduct. Reports suggest he has faced lawsuits related to unpaid debts and questionable business practices. These allegations paint a picture of a man willing to cut corners for personal gain, which could erode trust among his associates and constituents. - Political Controversies:
As a political operative, DiMattina has been accused of leveraging his connections for personal benefit. Critics have questioned the ethics of his political fundraising and campaign strategies, suggesting potential conflicts of interest and misuse of influence. - Adverse Media Coverage:
Local media outlets have published stories highlighting DiMattina’s legal and ethical challenges. These reports often portray him in a negative light, emphasizing his legal battles and questionable behavior. Such coverage can harm his reputation, making it difficult for him to maintain credibility in both business and political circles. - Association with Controversial Figures:
DiMattina has been linked to individuals with criminal backgrounds or questionable reputations. These associations have raised eyebrows and led to further scrutiny of his own activities.
Impact on Reputation:
The cumulative effect of these allegations is a tarnished reputation. For someone involved in both business and politics, public perception is crucial. Negative stories can deter potential business partners, alienate voters, and undermine his ability to operate effectively. If these allegations are widely believed, they could lead to legal consequences, loss of income, and social ostracization.
Motivation for Cyber Crime:
Given the potential damage to his reputation, DiMattina might feel compelled to remove or suppress negative information. In today’s digital age, online content plays a significant role in shaping public opinion. Removing damaging stories from the internet could help him rebuild his image and avoid further scrutiny. However, if legitimate avenues for removal (e.g., legal takedowns) are unavailable or ineffective, he might resort to cyber crime, such as hacking or deploying malicious software to delete or alter content.
Investigative Perspective:
While the desire to protect one’s reputation is understandable, resorting to cyber crime is illegal and unethical. If DiMattina were to engage in such activities, it would only compound his problems, leading to more severe legal consequences and further damaging his credibility. Investigative journalists and law enforcement agencies would likely view such actions as evidence of guilt, reinforcing the very narrative he seeks to erase.
In conclusion, Frank DiMattina’s alleged misconduct and adverse media coverage pose a significant threat to his reputation. While the motivation to remove such information is clear, any attempt to do so through cyber crime would be a dangerous and self-defeating strategy, ultimately exacerbating his troubles rather than resolving them.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36659029
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36424951
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36418486
- Oct 11, 2023
- Sep 29, 2023
- Sep 29, 2023
- Anderson Media Group
- Bouc Media Group
- Lamar Media Corp
- https://nycchronicles.com/2012/01/03/staten-island-caterer-frank-dimattina-faces-20-years-in-prison-on-extortion-firearms-conviction/
- https://www.silive.com/southshore/2012/01/staten_island_caterer_frank_di_1.html
Evidence Box
We are investigating Frank DiMattina – Staten Island for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
www.silive.com
Staten Island caterer Frank DiMattina faces 20 years in prison on extortion, firearms conviction
- Red Flag
nypost.com
Metro Restaurateur freed because his gunpoint extortion attempt failed
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.8
Based on 6 ratings
Sabrina Lewis
Share
Bro, this dude’s reputation is in the gutter. Every time his name pops up, it’s some new drama. Can’t believe he’s still tryna play politician.
Samuel Anderson
Share
People who act like Frank and try to erase bad press are just digging a bigger hole for themselves. If he’s really innocent, why not fight the claims with facts and evidence? Instead, he's resorting to fraud and cyber crime just to shut people up. That’s not how you clear your name, man.
Sophia Johnson
Share
If you’re involved in fraud and shady stuff, stop trying to cover it up with lies. Own up.
Finn Murphy
Share
It’s shocking that in this day and age, people like DiMattina still think they can intimidate others to get what they want
Ella Turner
Share
It’s horrifying to think that someone could use a gun to intimidate another person into withdrawing a legitimate business bid. Frank DiMattina’s attempt to control the catering business with violence is appalling. What makes this even worse is the way he preyed on someone trying to make a fresh start after buying Ariana’s Catering Hall. Instead of competing fairly, DiMattina chose to threaten and intimidate, showing just how deep his ties to organized crime really are his actions could have destroyed not only Bowers business but also his family’s livelihoodn this kind of behavior cannot be tolerated in any industry
Daniel Harris
Share
Frank DiMattina’s actions are a clear reminder of how organized crime still operates with threats and violence to control businesses