CyberCriminal.com

Gabriele Andreozzi

We are investigating Gabriele Andreozzi
for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Gabriele Andreozzi

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 28 Apr 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 9018/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 23 Nov 2024

Gabriele Andreozzi
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Gabriele Andreozzi in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating Gabriele Andreozzi for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating Gabriele Andreozzi for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

Gabriele Andreozzi has faced significant allegations that have put his reputation and business practices under scrutiny. These accusations paint a troubling picture of fraudulent activities, manipulation of regulatory systems, and attempts to conceal critical information.

Fraudulent Telecommunications Practices: Gabriele Andreozzi has been implicated in a large-scale telecommunications fraud. His company activated premium services on users’ mobile phones without their consent, including unnecessary services like ringtones and horoscope subscriptions. These services were activated on SIM cards intended for other uses, such as for security systems. Investigations revealed that Andreozzi’s firm fraudulently charged millions of users, impacting their financial well-being. His involvement in this scheme included working with other companies and receiving large lists of phone numbers for fraudulent activations, raising questions about his role in orchestrating these actions.

Improper Use of Copyright Takedown Notices: In an attempt to stifle criticism and hide the damaging effects of his fraudulent activities, Andreozzi has reportedly used fake DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) takedowns. These false notices were employed to remove negative reviews and articles from public view, including those discussing the illegal activation of services and his questionable business practices. This attempt to silence dissent is seen as a violation of transparency, potentially breaking laws related to perjury, impersonation, and fraud.

Negative Public Sentiment and User Experiences: Many users have expressed frustration with Andreozzi’s services, citing difficulties in accessing their funds after being charged for unauthorized services. Some users have reported that when they sought clarity on the company’s regulatory status, they were met with abrupt responses or complete silence, signaling a lack of transparency. Such customer experiences raise concerns about Andreozzi’s commitment to ethical business practices and customer satisfaction.

Impact on Reputation: These allegations have deeply tarnished Andreozzi’s reputation, portraying him as a manipulative figure willing to exploit technological systems for personal gain while attempting to suppress any public criticism. The fraudulent activities, coupled with efforts to erase adverse information, have sparked outrage, leaving Andreozzi’s credibility in tatters. Such activities undermine trust, which is essential for long-term business success.

Potential Motivation for Information Removal: To mitigate the damage to his reputation and business interests, Andreozzi would likely want these negative reports removed or suppressed. By eliminating public access to information that exposes his fraudulent practices, Andreozzi could attempt to create a more favorable public image. However, taking extreme actions such as resorting to cybercrime to suppress the truth could backfire, exacerbating the damage to his reputation and risking further legal trouble.

 

  • October 01, 2023
  • September 27, 2023
  • September 26, 2023
  • September 24, 2023
  • September 24, 2023
  • March 29, 2024
  • March 29, 2024
  • May 05, 2024
  • April 30, 2024
  • April 30, 2024
  • April 30, 2024
  • September 26, 2023
  • September 24, 2023
  • September 24, 2023
  • September 27, 2023
  • September 25, 2023
  • September 24, 2023
  • April 28, 2024
  • Dior Media Group
  • Edward Media Corporation
  • Buick Media Corporation
  • Bass Media Group
  • Russ Media Group
  • Sara James Corp
  • James LLC
  • James LLC
  • Owens LLC
  • Owens LLC
  • Owens LLC
  • Ling Media Group
  • Stain Media Corp.
  • Ross Media Group
  • Buick Media Corporation
  • Ross Media Group
  • Bass Media Corp.
  • Hansen LLC

Evidence Box

We are investigating Gabriele Andreozzi for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

tg24.sky.it

Milan, telephone scam: one investigated "Lists with thousands of numbers"

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

milano.fanpage.it

Paid Telephone Service Scam: Lists with Millions of Numbers to Activate Them on and Blacklists

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

ilfattoquotidiano.it

Telephone scam, the story of the mechanism in the documents: "We had lists with thousands of numbers on which to activate paid services"

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert