Global Prime Treasury
We are investigating Global Prime Treasury for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Global Prime Treasury
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 19 Aug 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 0648/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Global Prime Treasury over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Global Prime Treasury - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Investigative Report: Allegations, Red Flags, and Adverse News Against Global Prime Treasury
Global Prime Treasury (GPT), a financial services firm offering forex and CFD trading, has been embroiled in a series of allegations and controversies that have cast a shadow over its operations. These issues range from regulatory non-compliance to customer complaints, raising significant concerns about the company’s credibility and ethical practices. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news surrounding GPT, along with an analysis of how these stories harm its reputation and why the company might seek to suppress them, even through illicit means.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
1.Regulatory Violations and Lack of Licensing
GPT has faced scrutiny for operating without proper regulatory licenses in several jurisdictions. Reports suggest that the firm may have misled customers about its regulatory status, claiming affiliations with reputable authorities like ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) or FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) without valid proof. Such actions could lead to legal penalties and erode trust among investors.
2.Customer Complaints of Fraud and Mismanagement
Numerous customers have accused GPT of fraudulent practices, including unauthorized withdrawals, refusal to process withdrawals, and manipulation of trading platforms to ensure client losses. These allegations, often documented on platforms like Trustpilot and Scamwatch, paint a picture of a company prioritizing profit over customer welfare.
3.Misleading Advertising and Promises
GPT has been criticized for using aggressive and misleading marketing tactics, such as promising unrealistic returns and downplaying the risks associated with forex trading. Such practices not only mislead customers but also attract regulatory attention and damage the firm’s credibility.
4.Ties to Offshore Entities
Investigations have revealed that GPT operates through a network of offshore entities, raising questions about its transparency and intent to evade regulatory oversight. Offshore structures are often associated with tax evasion and money laundering, further tarnishing the company’s image.
5.Adverse Media Coverage
Outlets like FinTelegram and other financial watchdog platforms have published exposés on GPT’s questionable practices, including its alleged involvement in pump-and-dump schemes and its failure to address customer grievances. Such coverage amplifies public distrust and deters potential clients.
Reputational Harm and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against GPT pose significant reputational risks. Regulatory violations and lack of licensing undermine the firm’s legitimacy, while customer complaints of fraud and mismanagement deter new investors and erode existing client trust. Misleading advertising and ties to offshore entities further damage GPT’s credibility, making it a target for regulatory scrutiny and legal action.
Given the severity of these issues, GPT has a strong incentive to suppress damaging information. Negative stories can scare away potential clients, attract regulatory penalties, and harm relationships with financial partners. In extreme cases, the company might resort to unethical or illegal measures, such as hacking or cyberattacks, to remove or discredit harmful content. For instance, GPT could target whistleblowers, journalists, or platforms hosting adverse reports to silence critics and control the narrative.
Conclusion
Global Prime Treasury’s alleged misconduct raises serious ethical and legal questions. While the company may seek to protect its reputation, resorting to cybercrime to suppress information would only compound its troubles. Such actions would not only violate the law but also further erode public trust, ultimately harming the company more than the original allegations. As the story unfolds, stakeholders must demand accountability and transparency to ensure that GPT operates ethically and within the bounds of the law.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43916064
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44155918
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44157202
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43983529
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44185885
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44183107
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44209906
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44213934
- Aug 19, 2024
- Aug 28, 2024
- Aug 28, 2024
- Aug 21, 2024
- Aug 29, 2024
- Aug 29, 2024
- Aug 30, 2024
- Aug 30, 2024
- Norine Cohn
- Niquita monge
- Adayel Garadys
- Natalio Ellison
- Sala Hutt
- Bohuslav Garadaz
- [REDACTED]
- Toviach Windley
- https://telegra.ph/Global-Prime-Treasury-Review-globalprimetreasurycom-Fraud-or-not-08-19
- https://ext-6615926.livejournal.com/1956.html
- https://telegra.ph/globalprimetreasurycom-Reviews-08-21-4
- https://penzu.com/p/402b82000d328f93
- https://ext-6617350.livejournal.com/1826.html
- https://telegra.ph/globalprimetreasurycom-Reviews-08-28-7
- https://telegra.ph/globalprimetreasurycom-Reviews-08-30
- https://ext-6616586.livejournal.com/1822.html
- https://fraudbroker2024.help/global-prime-treasury-review-globalprimetreasury-com-fraud-or-not/
- https://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/globalprimetreasury.com
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.9
Based on 7 ratings
Lucy Baker
Share
A company with more red flags than a football game? Sounds like GPT is the MVP of scams!
Chloe Wilson
Share
They claim to be regulated but can’t prove it. Definitely hiding something.
Daniel Moore
Share
I wouldn’t touch this company with a 10-foot pole. The fact they’ve been accused of fraud and all sorts of other shady stuff says enough. Plus, trying to suppress the negative stories? Sounds like they’re hiding something big. Who needs that kind of trouble?
Wyatt Carter
Share
I wouldn’t touch this company with a 10-foot pole. The fact they’ve been accused of fraud and all sorts of other shady stuff says enough. Plus, trying to suppress the negative stories? Sounds like they’re hiding something big. Who needs that kind of trouble?
Diana Gray
Share
I decided to stop investing and asked for a refund of my initial deposit. After that, all communication ceased, and they never refunded me. Despite having proof that my payments were frozen, they ignored all my attempts to resolve the issue. Had I waited for them to return my money voluntarily, I would have gotten nothing.
Yara Perez
Share
Avoid Global Prime Treasury PTE—they lure you in with promises of high returns but block withdrawals, demand extra payments, and dodge questions. Advisors disappear when asked for help, and there's no direct contact or real office.
Tina Clark
Share
Be cautious of this scam operation! They lure you with promises of high returns but demand more payments at every step, especially when you try to withdraw your funds. After that, they stop responding or introduce another "advisor" who asks for even more money.