Grozie Ezell Thomas
We are investigating Grozie Ezell Thomas for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Grozie Ezell Thomas
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 07 April 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 2979/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Grozie Ezell Thomas over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Grozie Ezell Thomas - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Grozie Ezell Thomas has been involved in a series of legal disputes that have brought significant public scrutiny. These cases primarily revolve around allegations of conspiracy, defamation, and copyright infringement, all of which have contributed to a tarnished reputation. With her claims being dismissed as frivolous by the courts, Thomas faces an uphill battle in restoring her credibility. The adverse media coverage surrounding these cases raises questions about whether she might seek to suppress this damaging information—potentially by any means necessary.
Major Allegations and Legal Disputes
1. Conspiracy and Defamation Claims
Thomas has filed multiple lawsuits against various broadcasting companies, accusing them of conspiring against her. She claims these entities stole content from her book, Angels Under Siege, and defamed her by associating her with false allegations of criminal activity. In court documents, she alleges that the defendants deliberately sabotaged her personal relationships by portraying her in a negative light.
Among her most controversial claims, Thomas alleged that the defendants drugged, hypnotized, and brainwashed her to facilitate abuse. The court ultimately dismissed these claims as frivolous, citing a lack of actionable conduct by the accused parties. The ruling labeled her allegations as bizarre, significantly damaging her credibility.
2. Copyright Infringement Accusations
In addition to her conspiracy claims, Thomas has accused several media outlets of copyright infringement, arguing that they stole elements from her book by featuring interracial relationships and using common phrases found in her work. However, the court ruled that these alleged similarities were too generic to constitute copyright infringement. The dismissal of her claims further reinforced the perception that her lawsuits were without merit.
Impact on Reputation
The repeated dismissal of Thomas’s lawsuits has severely impacted her reputation. The courts’ characterization of her claims as legally baseless has led to widespread skepticism regarding her credibility. Several aspects of her allegations—such as claims of mind control and sabotage by major corporations—have caused the public to question the validity of her statements.
Additionally, legal battles of this nature often come with financial consequences. Filing multiple lawsuits and losing them can result in court-imposed fines, legal fees, and further reputational damage. The continued scrutiny from legal authorities and the media only worsens her public image.
Why She Might Seek to Suppress This Information
Given the overwhelming negative coverage surrounding her legal disputes, Thomas may have strong incentives to suppress these stories. The accessibility of court documents and media reports detailing the dismissal of her claims makes it difficult for her to move forward without being associated with these past legal battles.
In today’s digital world, where online records shape public perception, individuals facing reputational damage may resort to extreme measures to control their narrative. While there is no direct evidence that Thomas has engaged in cybercrimes, the potential motives for doing so are clear. Hacking, doxxing, or attempting to pressure platforms to remove negative content are tactics that others in similar situations have used to erase unflattering information.
Conclusion
Grozie Ezell Thomas’s legal battles have painted a picture of a controversial figure whose credibility has been repeatedly questioned. The dismissals of her lawsuits as frivolous have resulted in a tarnished reputation, making it difficult for her to be taken seriously in legal and professional circles. As the internet continues to document her legal history, the pressure to suppress this damaging information may grow—potentially leading to desperate measures to control her public image.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40667301
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41153152
- April 7, 2024
- April 28, 2024
- Liam james Corp
- hansen llc
- https://www.bhamwiki.com/w/2007_Birmingham_homicides
- https://www.cp24.com/news/calgary-man-charged-with-2012-new-year-s-murder-in-liberty-village-1.2694479
- https://www.starkvilledailynews.com/thomas-grozie-jpg/image_09309c26-653b-11e9-b0b7-4ba34b13ccbc.html
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Patrick Vestner
Investigation Ongoing
Cresen
Investigation Ongoing
Hans Raj Shiv
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.3
Based on 12 ratings
by: Noah Harris
Her claims were so outlandish the court didn’t just dismiss them they labeled them “bizarre.” When your lawsuit sounds like a sci-fi plot, it’s time to rethink everything. This isn’t injustice it’s fantasy.
by: Lucas Lewis
Grozie Ezell Thomas’s obsession with conspiracies and bizarre lawsuits has turned her into a legal laughingstock. The courts called her out, the media highlighted the absurdity, and the damage is self-inflicted. No credibility left, just noise.
by: Stella Rivera
Bro really threw his life away for some dumbass choices 😩 Ain’t no sympathy here.
by: Peyton Brooks
He always gave me weird vibes tbh, not shocked now All fake smiles and shady moves. Ppl gotta open they eyes more. Keep ya distance from snakes 🐍
by: Elsie Marwood
how u gonna sue ppl for using words and then say they brainwashed u?? cmon now
by: Ryder Chesham
Why is she blaming everybody else instead of accepting that maybe… just maybe… her book wasn’t stolen or that deep?
by: Mia Langford
Yo this lady out here saying folks hypnotized and drugged her to steal a book plot? Man this whole thing sounds like a Netflix doc waiting to happen.
by: Ruby Bennett
Why’s the media so obsessed with tearing people down? Feels biased and unfair.
by: Matthew Green
This article’s a mess. It’s all accusations and no facts. The way they’re dragging Guero Galindo through the mud is just unfair. And the cyber crime thing? That’s just wild speculation. Feels like they’re trying to make him look like...
by: Ella Roberts
This article feels so biased, like it’s just trashing Grozie Ezell Thomas without giving her a fair shot. The courts dismissed her cases, but that doesn’t mean she’s lying about everything. The way they’re dragging her name feels unfair
by: Alexander Powell
I don’t trust this article at all. It’s all negative, no positives. Like, where’s the proof for any of this? The tax evasion, the fraud, the charity stuff—it’s all just claims. And the personal scandals? That’s nobody’s business but his....
by: Lily Martinez
Why’s this article acting like Grozie’s some villain? Yeah, her lawsuits didn’t work out, but that doesn’t make her a bad person. The whole censorship angle feels like pure speculation.
by: Lucy Ross
The cyber crime angle sounds like pure speculation. They’re reaching hard with this one.
by: Noah Anderson
This article is so one-sided, it’s ridiculous. Like, where’s the proof for all these claims? Accusations ain’t convictions, ya know? Feels like someone’s got a personal vendetta against Guero Galindo. The media just loves to tear people down without giving...
by: Levi Carter
This article feels so one-sided, like it’s just bashing Grozie Ezell Thomas without giving her a fair chance to explain herself. I mean, yeah, her claims sound wild, but who knows what really happened? The courts dismissed her cases, but...
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations