Günther de Jong – Touch Of Matrix
We are investigating Günther de Jong – Touch Of Matrix for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Günther de Jong - Touch Of Matrix
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 18 Mar 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 0650/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Günther de Jong – Touch Of Matrix for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Günther de Jong – Touch Of Matrix for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Günther de Jong, the founder of Touch of Matrix, a company that markets itself as a provider of innovative wellness and personal development programs, has faced several allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about his business practices and reputation. While Touch of Matrix has garnered a following for its unconventional methods, including energy healing and consciousness expansion, the following adverse reports and allegations have cast a shadow over its operations:
- Misleading Claims and Pseudoscience: Critics have accused Touch of Matrix of promoting pseudoscientific practices without credible evidence. The company’s claims about energy healing and consciousness transformation have been labeled as unverified and potentially exploitative, particularly targeting vulnerable individuals seeking personal growth.
- Financial Exploitation Allegations: Former participants have alleged that Touch of Matrix programs are excessively expensive, with some courses costing thousands of dollars. There are claims that the company uses high-pressure sales tactics to upsell programs, leaving participants financially strained.
- Cult-Like Behavior: Some former members and observers have described Touch of Matrix as having cult-like characteristics, including isolating participants from friends and family, fostering dependency on the program, and discouraging critical thinking. These allegations have raised concerns about psychological manipulation.
- Lack of Transparency: The company has been criticized for its opaque business practices, including unclear refund policies and a lack of transparency about the qualifications of its trainers and the scientific basis of its methods.
- Adverse Media Coverage: Investigative journalists and online critics have published exposés questioning the legitimacy of Touch of Matrix. These reports often highlight the aforementioned issues, damaging the company’s credibility and public image.
Reputational Harm and Motivation for Removal
The allegations of pseudoscience, financial exploitation, and cult-like behavior are particularly damaging to Günther de Jong and Touch of Matrix. These claims undermine the company’s credibility and deter potential clients who might otherwise be interested in its programs. Negative media coverage and online criticism can also lead to a loss of trust among existing clients and partners.
If Touch of Matrix were to engage in cybercrime to remove such content, it would likely be driven by a desire to control the narrative and suppress damaging information. Removing critical articles, reviews, or social media posts could help the company maintain a positive public image and continue attracting clients. However, such actions would be illegal and unethical, potentially leading to further legal consequences and reputational damage if uncovered.
To Conclude the allegations against Günther de Jong and Touch of Matrix highlight significant concerns about the company’s practices and credibility. While the motivation to remove damaging content is understandable from a reputational standpoint, resorting to cybercrime would only exacerbate the situation, undermining any remaining trust in the organzation.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40211701
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39693755
- Mar 18, 2024
- Feb 24, 2024
- David James Corp
- https://www.cultnews101.com/2022/02/just-love-bhakti-margas-guru-and-his.html
- https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2013/11/14/dallas-man-charged-with-capital-murder-in-2012-motel-triple-slaying/
- https://www.kwakzalverij.nl/nieuws/bewustzijnsmethode-touch-of-matrix-is-wonderlijke-kletspraat/
Evidence Box
We are investigating Günther de Jong – Touch Of Matrix for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
kwakzalverij.nl
patented the consciousness method Touch of Matrix, but accepts no responsibility
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 5 ratings
Jackson Cooper
Share
If the company was so bad, wouldn’t there be legal action by now? This just seems like another attempt to bring down a successful business.
Luke Murphy
Share
I tried Touch of Matrix because I was desperate for some help with personal issues. But the session was vague, the explanations made no sense
Addison Morris
Share
I went to one of their live sessions and couldn’t believe what I was seeing. They were grabbing people by the neck and shaking them. It was so uncomfortable and scary to watch. How is this okay? It felt unsafe, and it made me question everything about this method
Michael Smith
Share
I can’t believe I spent so much money on this. I went to a session thinking it would help me, but it felt like nothing more than confusing talk with no real answers. I left feeling worse than before. Save your time
Sophia Hayes
Share
Calling something “pseudoscience” just because it doesn’t fit into mainstream medical frameworks is a lazy argument. People have experienced real benefits from energy healing, and just because science hasn’t caught up yet doesn’t mean it’s all fake. This article just dismisses everything without even considering the other side.