InvestingViews
We are investigating InvestingViews for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : InvestingViews
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 24 Nov 2021
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 3033/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into InvestingViews over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that InvestingViews - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
InvestingViews, a platform offering financial insights and investment advice, has faced a series of allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about its credibility and operational integrity. While the platform markets itself as a reliable source for investors, several adverse reports and controversies have tarnished its reputation. Below is a summary of the major allegations and their potential impact on InvestingViews’ standing in the financial community.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
- Misleading Financial Advice
Critics have accused InvestingViews of providing unverified or overly optimistic stock recommendations, which some claim are designed to manipulate market sentiment rather than offer genuine insights. This has led to accusations of potential market manipulation, particularly in cases where the platform’s recommendations align suspiciously with the interests of undisclosed third parties. - Lack of Transparency
InvestingViews has been criticized for failing to disclose conflicts of interest, such as partnerships with companies or individuals whose stocks are promoted on the platform. This lack of transparency undermines trust and raises questions about the objectivity of its financial advice. - Questionable Affiliate Marketing Practices
Reports suggest that InvestingViews may engage in aggressive affiliate marketing, where users are directed to brokerage services or investment products that pay the platform commissions. Critics argue that this creates a conflict of interest, as the platform may prioritize profit over the best interests of its users. - Data Privacy Concerns
There have been allegations that InvestingViews collects and shares user data with third parties without adequate consent. This has sparked concerns about the platform’s commitment to user privacy and compliance with data protection regulations like GDPR. - Adverse Media Coverage
Several investigative reports and user testimonials have highlighted instances of poor customer service, unfulfilled promises, and even accusations of fraudulent activity. These stories have been amplified on social media and financial forums, further damaging the platform’s reputation.
Reputational Damage and Motives for Removal
The allegations against InvestingViews strike at the core of its credibility as a financial advice platform. Misleading advice and lack of transparency erode user trust, which is critical in the financial sector. Affiliate marketing practices and data privacy concerns further alienate users who feel exploited or misled. Adverse media coverage compounds these issues, creating a negative feedback loop that can deter new users and drive away existing ones.
Given the severity of these allegations, InvestingViews may have a strong incentive to suppress damaging information. In extreme cases, this could lead to unethical or illegal actions, such as committing cyber crimes to remove negative content. For instance, the platform might attempt to hack or pressure websites hosting critical reports, manipulate search engine results, or intimidate whistleblowers. Such actions, while illegal, could be seen as a desperate attempt to control the narrative and protect its business interests.
Conclusion
The allegations against InvestingViews paint a troubling picture of a platform that may prioritize profit over ethical practices. While the platform continues to attract users seeking financial guidance, its reputation is increasingly under scrutiny. The potential for cyber crimes to suppress negative information underscores the high stakes involved, as the platform seeks to maintain its image in a competitive and trust-driven industry. Investors and users should approach InvestingViews with caution, ensuring they conduct independent research before relying on its advice.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25951362
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25779560
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25957272
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25693145
- November 24, 2021
- November 21, 2021
- November 21, 2021
- November 08, 2021
- Kenneth Porter
- Walter Elliott
- Walter Elliott
- Lorraine Edwards
- https://kenneth-porter.blogspot.com/2021/11/investingviews-scam.html
- https://walterelliott.blogspot.com/2021/11/investingviews-scam.html?m=1
- https://lorraine1813.blogspot.com/2021/11/investingviewsorg.html
- https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/community/threads/investingviews-scam.71624/
- https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/forex-reviews/19475/Investingviews-forex-brokers
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Robert Hellgren
Investigation Ongoing
Dr. Stanley Bernstein
Investigation Ongoing
Melford Capital Partners
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.6
Based on 13 ratings
by: Yara Thomas
InvestingViews promised to help me make smart investment decisions, but all I got were unverified stock picks that didn’t pan out. They don’t disclose their conflicts of interest, which is a huge red flag.
by: Xander Ward
After following InvestingViews for months, I realized their advice is biased, and they’re pushing stocks that benefit them through affiliate links. It’s all about profit for them, not genuine financial guidance.
by: William Green
I trusted InvestingViews for stock tips, only to end up losing thousands. Their recommendations seem to be based more on manipulating the market than giving honest advice.
by: Layla Jawad
They promise to guide your investments, but forget to mention they’re also guiding your personal data straight to the highest bidder.
by: Isaac Kato
Transparency isn’t their strong suit—unless you count how clearly you can see the conflict of interest.
by: Mirela Petrescu
Turns out the only investment you make with InvestingViews is in disappointment.
by: Trevor Curtis
InvestingViews may pretend to be a safe space for investors, but the reality is alarming. Data privacy breaches, shady marketing, and a refusal to be transparent mark their operations. Their attempts to bury criticism show how deep the rot goes.
by: Ruby Doyle
Every time bad press hits, InvestingViews acts like it’s fake news. But user testimonials and independent investigations say otherwise.
by: Shane Carroll
The constant alignment between their picks and hidden third-party interests is suspicious at best. It feels like users are being led into traps disguised as “insights.” If it smells like manipulation, it probably is. Do your own research seriously.
by: Paige Fuller
When a platform pushes stocks and hides the sponsors, that’s deception, not insight.
by: Silas Erickson
I thought I was getting sound financial advice, but all I got was a lighter wallet. InvestingViews should be called 'InvestingScams'. Don't be fooled by their slick website.
by: Piper Benson
After following their tips, my portfolio tanked. It's clear they have no idea what they're talking about. Save yourself the trouble and look elsewhere for investment advice.
by: Everett Malone
I trusted InvestingViews for financial guidance, but their recommendations were misleading and cost me dearly. It's disheartening to see a platform that claims to help investors actually taking advantage of them. I hope others don't fall into the same trap.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations